PTSD is explored in the new war movie that really focuses on the aftermath of the situations the soldiers are placed in.  Based on a true story, this film has some powerful moments when looking at the lives of these three soldiers returning from Iraq.

Unfortunately, the film only does an okay job of making connections with the audience with those characters.

Adam Schumann (Miles Teller), Solo (Beulah Koale) and Billy Waller (Joe Cole) are returning from Iraq after a tragic event cost the life of their SFC James Doster (Brad Beyer).  Dealing with guilt, the memories of what had happened and serious cases of PTSD, the three friends struggle to adapt to life back in the US and to try and find help for their conditions.

The strongest aspect of this film is the deplorable manner that these men are treated by our government and the health care community.  These veterans had to desperately seek help from anyone able to give it, only to find more red tape and lack of empathy.  Even those who are empathetic to the soldiers’ cases are limited by time and what they can actually do.

Coupled that with the terrible stresses connected to PTSD, the film shows a dramatic image of three damaged soldiers, even heroes, who can’t seem to get proper care or help despite their terms of service to our country.  This should really be a national shame to the United States that something like this is allowed to go on.

However, as a movie, Thank You For Your Service has some flaws.  I could have used some more connections shown me to build the relationship between these three men.  There are some scenes, but not enough to really draw me into their stories.  Several of the scenes are spoken about instead being shown to us and that just is never a solid way to run a movie.

Second, some of the soldiers’ relationships outside of their unit were weaker and that did not make me connect emotionally when some of them started to fall apart.  I did like the relationship between Miles Teller and Haley Bennett though, as that relationship truly felt real and loving.  The other two relationships did not receive any screen time at all and it did not draw me in like Teller and Bennett’s relationship does.

Amy Schumer is in this movie as well in a rare dramatic role.  She is not on screen for long, but she was decent.  I spent most of the time trying to convince myself that it was her hidden under the dark hair that she now had.

I think I would rather had more outrage against the system that the film seems to start with, but discarded for nonsensical plots such as a drug/arms dealer story.  While there are good moments, the film does feel a tad too forgettable and not the powerful social message that it could have been.

3.4 stars

You wouldn’t think that a film with the names of the Coen Brothers, George Clooney, Matt Dmon and Julianne Moore could fail, would you.  Well, Suburbicon is the proof that it can.

Set in an all white community in the 1950s, Matt Damon played Gardner Lodge, who apparently was having problems with local gangsters over money that he owed, and was hoping to protect his family.  However, truth was that the film is truly about an insurance fraud case and a murder.

Now, the movie’s trailers sold me one aspect of this movie and it misdirected me into believing one thought of Suburbicon.  It made Matt Damon look like the hero of the story. This is absolutely not the case.  In fact, Gardner Lodge is one of the least likable protagonists we have had come along in a while.

Honestly, the only character that had any redeeming quality here at all was Nicky (Noah Jupe), Lodge’s son.  This character was solid and does a great job in the movie giving the audience someone to root for.  Noah Jupe is excellent in the role as well.  2017 has seen a group of tremendous child actors plying their wares on screen, and Jupe is just the latest.

However, there is one massive problem with Suburbicon.  The film feels like it is two completely different movies with completely different tones, because the story involving Lodge and the insurance fraud is just one part of the film, and it is not even the part that the film begins with.

The film actually kicks off with the first part involved in a story of a family of African-Americans who moved into the all-white neighborhood, and how the white community responded in the unfortunately typical racist fashion.  Yet, these scenes have almost nothing to do with the main story of Gardner Lodge and the death of his wife (played by Julianne Moore), outside of happening next door.  Because of the separation of these stories and their distinctively contradictory tones, this whole racial story feels more like a distraction than it is an integral part of the movie.  In fact, Gardner uses what is going on next door as a literal distraction to accomplish much of what he does.  That diminished the potentially powerful message the film may have been trying to show.

Then, the film does not commit enough to making the main story a dark comedy.  There are some comedic moments, but there is nothing to really support the over-the-top situation that these characters find themselves in.  Because of that, the film does not feel very funny.

The actors all do a decent job, as no one is terrible.  Matt Damon and Julianne Moore are okay, probably because their characters are lacking depth.  We know very little about these two (three people…as Julianne Moore played twin sisters Rose and Margaret) and we know even less about the relationship between them.  We are told some history of them, but honestly the first 15-20 minutes of this part of the story I spent trying to figure out the connections of these characters.

Oscar Isaacs appeared and brought some much needed energy to a story that was quickly becoming boring, but he did not last long on screen.

Director George Clooney may have tried to cram too much into this film, which made it feel like a mishmash of too many types of film.  There might have been a good movie to be had if he would have focused on one aspect only and not tried to make, at least, two different movies.  Suburbicon had some moments where it showed what it could have been, but the sum of its parts does not add up to a good movie.

2.45 stars

SPOILERS

I am leading off the review with the spoiler tag because most of my thoughts on this movie deal with spoilers, so I am going to warn those of you who may want to see this very good movie, you may want to skip down to the end to see the star rating instead of reading the review.

You’ve been warned.

I did not know this was a true story.

That would have changed my viewing of the film.  It certainly would have changed my viewing of the film if I had known the tragic results of this true story.

Only the Brave tells the story of a group of local fire fighters who are trying to become a “Hotshots” unit.  The Hotshot units are groups who go ahead of fires and set their own controlled fires to burn away areas where the fire may go to find “fuel.”  It is an extremely dangerous job and this is the story of this group of real life heroes.

The film focuses on the Hotshot crew who would become known as the Granite Mountain Hotshots.  They became an elite firefighting unit, one of the top units in the country until, in 2013, a fire that seemed like it was no big deal sprung up and killed the entire unit, save one lone survivor.

This is the spoiler I was referring to as I had no idea that the entire unit was going to die.  I will tell you that I started picking up on some of the foreshadowing going on in the movie that led me to believe that either the character played by Josh Brolin or the character played by Miles Teller would not survive the film.  I had no idea the extent of the loss that I was going to get.

Brolin played “Supe” Eric Marsh, who was in charge of the Granite Mountain Hotshots, and who takes Miles Teller’s character, “Donut” Brendan McDonough, under his wing.  Brendan was a drug addict who was trying to put together his life after the birth of his baby daughter, and he applied to join the crew.  We find out later in the film that Marsh had had the same kind of issues in his past and that he saw himself in Brendan.

We get the most development from these two characters, and many of the other Granite Mountain Hotshots were left to be simply side characters.  An exception to this was Taylor Kitsch’s Chris MacKenzie, who had an interesting character to play and had a very engaging relationship develop with Brendan.  Otherwise, we got characters that were in the orbit of Marsh, such as his wife Amanda (Jennifer Connolly) and Duane (Jeff Bridges) as a family friend.  Connolly, in particular, gave a very strong performance here and the side story line of wanting to start a family was a realistic and honest portrayal.

The film also did not shy away from looking at how challenging o life this was, not only for the fire fighters, but also for the families of these men.  Balancing out the heroic deeds of these fire fighters with the fear that they may, one day, not return was at the forefront of the film, and becomes even more dramatic when that very instant happens.

In fact, I was ill-prepared for the finale of this film, and the fact that 19 of the 20 fire fighters in the Granite Mountain Hotshots died in this fire hit me hard.  These men were so skilled that it made it difficult to believe that they would all pay such an ultimate price.  I was prepared for one of the main characters to die, but I was not ready for such a tragic ending.

The film does a tremendous job of showing how these men become a family and how their own families form a support system for each other.  I can’t imagine what it must be like for these wives, family members, sons and daughters to face the possibility of losing their husbands, sons or fathers with each fire.  It cannot be a simple existence.

The scenes of the fires are so well done that it makes you wonder if they were actually setting forests on fire to get their shots.  The CGI was intensive and extremely well done and truly created the continued threat that hung over the heads of this crew.

Unfortunately, there was only so much time on the screen and many of the characters got shorted.  Many of them blended together and it was difficult to tell them apart at times.  Another issue with the film was there really was not that much of a plot there.  It felt more like a series of life events strung together until the final fire scene arrived.

Because of that lack of through line, the film felt too long at times.  I believe they could have dropped a few scenes, or blended a few of them together to help with that sense.

I am glad that I did not know the true story going in because I feel that my lack of knowledge helped ignite my emotional reaction to the final scenes.  I am not sure I would have been as struck if I knew they all were going to die.

The ensemble is very strong and the CGI is top notch.  I even liked the flaming bear.  The film has its share of flaws, but the trip was a hot one.

3.85 stars

Geostorm is a big ol’dumb disaster movie that is desperately predictable, has a plot full of massive holes, and has absolutely nothing new to bring to the disaster movie genre.

And yet, I did not hate it.

Don’t misunderstand me, this is a bad movie.  There are so many things wrong with it that I would never recommend that you go see it.  However, I did find myself somewhat entertained by the film, whether it was on purpose or accidentally.

And I have a feeling that after seeing the travesty that was The Snowman on Friday that this couldn’t help but be better.

Gerard Butler played Jake Lawson, one of the great scientists of the world, who created the space station known as Dutch Boy.  Dutch Boy was put in place as an unprecedented step by the countries of the world in an attempt to save the world from the extreme weather that had swept the earth and was killing millions of people.

However, Jake was anything but a team player and his attitude got him replaced by his own brother, Max (Jim Sturgess).  Three years later, someone sabotaged the Dutch Boy causing some of the drastic weather patterns to return that would require the assistance of Jake once again.

As Jake headed out to the space station, Max used his secret dalliance with Secret Service Agent Sarah Wilson (Abby Cornish) and a hacker friend (Adepero Oduye) to try and solve the mystery of who sabotaged the station.

By the way, this was the second movie in two days that I immediately picked the guilty person out as soon as that person walked onto the screen.  No spoilers, but you really shouldn’t need any to figure it out.

Gerard Butler has never come across to me as a genius scientist.  Maybe the dude who gave that genius scientist a swirly or a wedgie, but not the actual scientist.  He played the role as an action hero who coincidentally had some important smart line to say.  Of course, by this point, I had shut off my brain, so the lack of proper casting did not bother me.

I loved Secret Service Agent Sarah Wilson, who was both the most kick-ass and the absolute worst Secret Service agent of all time.  She allowed her secret relationship with Max to completely taint her job and put the president at risk.  Still, everything turned out fine so.. there is that.

The ending of this movie was so predictable, I bet I could have told it to you before the end of the first act of the film.  Maybe earlier.

And yet, I found myself entertained by the film.  Perhaps the fact that I went into this film expecting it to be nothing but a steaming pile of crap helped.  The fact that the film was mildly above the steaming pile of crap status helped elevate it in my eyes.  I never once enjoyed a trailer that I had seen for Geostorm and it was one that I was not looking forward to at all.  I think that may have helped my acceptance of this movie.

Geostorm is never going to win any awards.  It is a profoundly stupid movie that requires the audience to shut off their brains and hopes that they just keep shoving popcorn into their faces.  Don’t expect to engage the grey matter in Geostorm.  If you can do that, there is an unexpected amount of big and dumb explosive fun to be had.  It’s not a good movie, but I had more fun that I ever thought that I would.

2.6 stars

I had been excited about this film.  The trailers made The Snowman look like an exciting, thrill ride with a mysterious killer.

Instead, we got a dull, insipid piece of crap.

How disappointing.

I had seen the Rotten Tomatoes score prior to going, and knew it was low, but I did avoid the reviews because I had hoped that maybe the film would be better than it seemed.

Nope.  Just garbage.

Michael Fassbender played Harry Hole… let me say that again… his character’s name is actually Harry Hole.  Harry is a drunk, waking up in locations around the city with empty Vodka bottles in his hand.  His life is a mess, but apparently, he was a great detective/cop at one point.  Not that we see this ever… and I mean ever.  Instead, we are told once… and only once.  Any way, he becomes involved in a case where a serial killer is killing people and then is leaving a snowman behind at the crime scene.

The story becomes needlessly convoluted and yet completely idiotic.  There are so many failures in this plot, with massive plot holes and lack of character motivation.

Let’s start with the unfortunately named Harry Hole.  We know almost zero about him.  We know the basic fact that he is a drunk, but other than that, we know of no reason why to cheer him on, outside of the fact that he is Michael Fassbender and the lead of the movie.  Fassbender is capable of some great performances, however, this is not one of them.  I don’t know if he knew how bad this was and just phoned it in, but he is sincerely unremarkable.

There is a solid cast here, but there is nothing notable about any of the performances.  No one elevated the material from the shit stain that it was.

I have made this complaint before, but the SECOND the character who was eventually revealed to be the killer walked into the scene, I knew he was the Snowman.  No mystery about it…no doubt in my head.  Whenever a film is so painfully obvious, it is a clear sign that the film is poor.

However, Harry Hole could not see the clear signs as he continued to investigate the case.  I am not sure why people seemed to think this character was more than just another drunk cop.

There was a strange and pointless cameo with Val Kilmer.  Kilmer’s voice was dubbed, and dubbed poorly.  Why was it dubbed?  I did not know.  What I did know was I saw zero reason for this character to be in the movie.  You could have easily edited the scenes with Kilmer in them out of the film without losing anything.  I even thought that perhaps I dozed through part of his scenes because I did not know what the importance of them were.

Oh, and J.K. Simmons is in this movie too.  He played a character named Arve Stop and, from what I can tell, his only purpose in the movie is to be a red herring.  There are several “characters” that are there to be red herrings, simple plot devices.

Now, let’s talk a minute about the third act conclusion.  The first two acts were boring, but the third act was so inanely stupid and insulting that it made me desperate to see the film end.  There were literally several times where I laughed out loud in moments that the film meant to be suspenseful.  Not a good sign.

This movie was adapted from Jo Nesbø’s best selling novel, but I am guessing that there are MAJOR parts of the story left out, because the film does not make much sense and feels like a sketch of a film. Tomas Alfredson, the director of the great tense thriller Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, doesn’t come anywhere near that classic with this steaming pile of crap.

Such a tremendous disappointment.  One of the worst films of the year.  At first, I was going to give this around 1.2 stars, but, upon reflection, I realized this film did not deserve such a high star rating.  If I thought about it more, it might have gone lower yet.  But for now…

0.9 stars

This documentary was quite engaging as it deals with perhaps the most famous scene in movie history and its effects on the film world in general.

Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho was a departure for the acclaimed director and it caused plenty of shock and disbelief.  Much of the reason for that reaction was a scene about a third of the way through the movie where the star of the movie, Vivian Leigh, is murdered while taking a shower.

People did not see it coming.  The beginning of Psycho focused on Marian Crane, the character Leigh played, but it was all a red herring…a joke (as Hitchcock himself put it) on the audience, bringing the true story of Psycho to the forefront.

This documentary by Alexandre O. Philippe really hits its stride when it is dealing with the specifics on how the scene was shot and why Hitchcock did certain things and what they were meant to show.  Many big name stars appear in the documentary to espouse their own personal feelings about the scene.  These celebs include Jamie Lee Curtis, Peter Bogdanovich, Elijah Wood, Guillermo del Toro, and Eli Roth.

The title of the film is a reference to the 78 camera set-ups and 52 edits over the course of 3 minutes it took to finish the scene.  If you are someone who enjoys the process it takes to create a movie scene, or someone interested in breaking down the parts of an iconic film scene, then this documentary is for you.  Being a fan of Hitchcock, I enjoyed the film and I also appreciated the allusions to other Hitchcock films in comparison.

4 stars

Don’t be fooled. There is little to do with DC Comics and EYG Hall of Famer Wonder Woman in the new biopic, Professor Marston and the Wonder Women.  Instead, it is a look at the controversial creator of Princess Diana and the reputed three-way relationship that was on display in his life.

William Moulton Marston not only created Wonder Woman, but also invented the lie detector, along with his wife, Elizabeth Marston.  The film tells the story of the arrival of the young and beautiful assistant Olive and how this new addition threw the married couple’s relationship into a whole new world.

William (Luke Evans) and his wife Elizabeth (Rebecca Hall) were looking for assistance on a human behavior research when they hired Olive (Bella Heathcote).  It is not long before these three people are professing their love for one another and engaging in a threesome that would turn into more than just a momentary indiscretion.

The fact that the greatest female hero of all time has an origin that comes from bondage and an attempt to subvert society with ideas of dominance and ‘sexual perversity” is an amazing thought.  I did not know anything about this as a background for Diana.  This film spends more time on the relationship between the three main characters than it does with our favorite Amazon.  I found it interesting how the film used a hearing, headed up by Josette Frank (Connie Britton), by the National Organization for Decent Literature to frame the film.  In sense, these scenes with Luke Evans and Connie Britton are not that important to most of the film.

The relationship between Marston, Elizabeth and Olive is certainly the heart of this movie and if it did not work, this film would falter.  For me, it worked somewhat, but it did, especially early, felt too choppy.  It jumped around too much for my taste.  One minute, they were saying and doing one thing and then the next scene, they were doing just the opposite.

However, the relationship became more fascinating after they started to live together and they had to deal with some challenge of awkwardness among the culture of the time.

The film felt long at times and could have trimmed some of it down.  I found parts of the movie a little dull, but the relationship was intriguing at least.  The story was fascinating about the origin of Wonder Woman, but I could have used for more of that.  I heard a lot of positives about this one, but I did not like it as much as some.  Still, it is an interesting biopic.

3.3 stars

Jackie Chan has returned to the big screen in the new action thriller, The Foreigner that has a part of it that is a revenge movie and another part that is political thriller.  Unfortunately, the parts do not seem to merge very well.

Quan Ngoc Minh (Jackie Chan), a man with a spotted past, lost his daughter in a terrorist bombing in London and he goes on a quest to discover the names of the people responsible.  This led him to former IRA member and current British government official Liam Hennessy (Pierce Brosnan), whom Quan believed could provide him the information.

Jackie Chan was really good in this movie.  In fact, some of the early scenes in the film were more than just Jackie doing his action stunts.  He showed some serious emotional acting chops as well in the scenes where he was dealing with the death of his daughter.  However, there really is little to his character besides the loss of his daughter.  The film depends on you wanting to root for Jackie Chan, and does not give you another reason to cheer for him.  Later in the film, the character has some layers peeled away, but by that point, I had lost the interest in any back story.

I found much of the film dull.  The fight scenes with Chan were well done and exciting.  Some of the scenes with Pierce Brosnan were solid as well, but I found much of the remainder needlessly convoluted and unnecessary.

I don’t have much else to say about this one, honestly.  There are redeeming qualities about it, but not enough to make this a recommendation.

2.6 stars

We have seen this type of film before.  Everybody (including the film itself) is comparing this to Groundhog’s Day, the classic Bill Murray/Harold Ramis comedy and the action/adventure film Edge of Tomorrow.  Fact is, Happy Death Day cannot be positively compared to either of those films.

That does not make this a bad movie.  On contrary, I found myself really enjoying this horror/comedy/slasher film mash up.

We meet our leading lady, Tree (Jessica Rothe), waking up in a dorm room after what was implied to be a one-night stand.  Carter (Israel Broussard) is there waiting for her to awaken.  Tree storms from the dorm room and goes about the day, her birthday, being one grade A bitch.

However, near the end of the day, Tree is stalked and murdered by a baby-mask wearing killer.  Instead of dying, Tree wakes up again, back in the dorm room, and the day starts to repeat.  Eventually, she decides that the only way to stop this from happening is to figure out who her killer really is.

So…yes the film has many of the same ideas, beats and concepts as Groundhog’s Day.  There are many cliche things that happen to the character.  The fact that she is one of the “mean girls” at first, the conflicts with the other girls, the love interest with the professor, the estranged relationship with the father, none of these are particularly original.  However, what the film does with most of these cliches is interesting and enjoyable.

I have to say that those people who are just criticizing the movie because it is a “Groundhog’s Day” rip off are not giving this film a chance.

Truthfully, the movie is not that much of a horror movie. It is a slasher movie, but the killer is not the focus.  Instead, it is the victim that gets the spotlight.  Happy Death Day is not very scary either, so those looking for tremendous frights might feel disappointment.  Happy Death Day is much more of a comedy and a mystery story than it is a horror movie.

I was engaged in trying to figure out the killer.  I am usually pretty good at that, but I will admit that I did not have it solved.  I was looking for clues in the scenes and running ideas through my head as I watched the film, proving that the soon-to-be-repeated murder mystery had me hooked.

Jessica Rothe is excellent as our lead character of Tree (the name is weird).  She was very compelling, attractive and filled up the screen with her presence.  She also had a very easy chemistry with Israel Broussard, making it very comfortable to root for them as a couple.  Broussard’s character was a really nice guy and I found myself liking him a lot.

There are some very clever moments in the film as well, plot-wise.  The film is played in a very meta manner, almost with an acknowledgement that the film is silly fun and that the actors and creators know that and embrace that.

Director Christopher Landon directed Scout’s Guide to the Zombie Apocalypse, a silly little film that I enjoyed way more than I thought I would, and he wrote several of the Paranormal Activity movies.  He brings that very style to this film in a very effective manner.  The film is well directed and each shot is blocked with an appropriate eye.  The pacing is strong and the performances are engaging.

In the end, this movie should not be compared to these other movies because they are truly different, even if they have used the same plot device. Perhaps we can create a genre of “Repeating the day” movies and then we can look at them all together.  Until that day comes, I am going to look at individual movies at a time without a preconceived judgment.  And with that, Happy Death Day is a winner.

3.85 stars

The film claims that this is a true story…”mostly,” which immediately begs the question of how much of this story was made up for the big screen.

The film tells of the unlikely friendship between Queen Victoria of England (Judi Dench) and an Indian man Abdul Karim (Ali Fazal)whom started as a servant for her and ended her “Munshi” (teacher), and the hullabaloo this relationship brought about among the royal family and the other servants of the Royal family.

The film is, once again, a master class performance from the wonderful Judi Dench.  She so much to the historical figure of Queen Victoria in a simple, yet impressively complex way.  In just a few scenes, I understood completely why she became so platonicly smitten with the Indian clerk and why his arrival took her from someone who had to be helped from bed in the morning to someone who was figuratively embracing life with both hands.   The power of her subtle performance was amazing to watch and it reminds you of how great this woman truly is.

Ali Fazal was a good scene partner, but, to be honest, he did not reach the same level of excellence as Dench did.  Part of the reason stems from the character of Abdul not being as fully fleshed out as Victoria.  I was never quite sure why he was so loyal to the Queen or why he was willing to do everything that he did for her.

Because of that lack of a second side, I found the film fairly fluffy.  Instead of taking a potentially powerful story and going for it, the film seemed to play it safe with the controversial relationship and made much of the tone of the film comedic.  Deeper ideas were touch upon but were never supported or expanded upon.

And that is not a bad thing.  The film is completely watchable and enjoyable as is.  It did not need to be a deeper film and it absolutely can exist as a saccharine film.  I just felt as if there were opportunities to take this and explore some of the racial issues of the time in a deeper manner than which the film did.  I mean, it is there, but the context is very subtle.

Victoria & Abdul is a lightweight biopic featured around a relationship that the Royal Family had attempted to hide from the world after the death of the Queen.  Some information was found in one of Victoria’s summer homes over 100 years later and that led to a book entitled, Victoria & Abdul: The True Story of the Queen’s Closest Confidant to be written.  Judi Dench brings everything to this film and her second portrayal of Queen Victoria is worth seeing.  Unfortunately, this is a generally forgettable film.

3.4 stars

Denis Villeneuve has become one of our top new directors over the last few years as he has had some tremendous successes with Sicario, Prisoners and Arrival.  There couldn’t be a better director to step into the shoes of Ridley Scott and create the long-awaited sequel to his sci-fi classic Blade Runner.

I have only ever seen Blade Runner once, and, to be honest, I found it a little slow.  I had really wanted to re-watch the original prior to seeing the new film, but, unfortunately, I could not find the time.  I did not know how that might affect my enjoyment of the new film.

Happily, I did not feel the need to have seen the first film as I watched Blade Runner 2049.

The new Blade Runner movie is very complex.  It is long and, at times, very plodding, but in a very good way.  The story has just enough familiar beats to it to make you understand that you are existing in the Blade Runner universe created back in 1982, but also has plenty of originality of its own.

Multiple-time Oscar nominated cinematographer Roger Deakins is absolutely at the top of his game as this film is a piece of visual art.  The cinematography is unbelievably tremendous and should end that losing streak Deakins has had in the Oscar race.

The cinematography is really aided by the sound of this movie.  The music and the sound effects are amazing and blend together seamlessly.

There are many top notch performances in Blade Runner 2049, especially from Ryan Gosling and Harrison Ford.  Both of these actors bring the goods here.  Ford has not been this good in quite a while.  They have an easy relationship and chemistry and the film pops when they are both on screen.

Sylvia Hoeks as Luv is the standout villain in the film.  She steals just about every scene she is in and she kicks some mighty butt in her action scenes.  She has some great moments with Robin Wright as well.

Dave Bautista was another great performance, although a short one.  Bautista has really been solid in his roles, and this one sets the standard for what we would see.

I am avoiding any recaps to prevent any spoilers because I think going into the film with just the barest knowledge of what was going to happen really helped the film.

There is a major drawback to the film though and it is the role of Jared Leto.  Leto is barely in the film and his character, Niander Wallace, is a major disappointment.  Luv blows Wallace away with intensity, energy and development.  Leto could easily be removed from this film without there being any loss in story, plot or characterization.  That is a serious failure for a great actor.

Spectacular in scope and cinema, Blade Runner 2049 has a lot to offer to fans of sci-fi.  It is a long movie and it might be a challenging watch for the typical movie going audience, but the film is worth the time it takes.

4.2 stars

I am unsettled.

I did not know this was a Stephen King adaptation until after I finished the movie.  I also did not know that this was directed by Mike Flanagan, who was responsible for some great horror/thriller films the last few years including Hush, Oculus and the surprisingly entertaining sequel Ouija:  Origin of Evil.

Perhaps if I knew any of this, I would have had higher expectations for Gerald’s Game on Netflix.  However, I did not know, so when I heard Chris Stuckmann say he had a review coming on this film (during his review on Flatliners), I thought I would check it out as well.

And I am unsettled.

Gerald (Bruce Greenwood) and Jesse (Carla Gugino) are a married couple who head to an isolated house for some role play in an attempt to spice up their marriage.  After having both hands handcuffed to the best posts, Jesse watches in horror as Gerald has a heart attack, falls off the bed, strikes his head and dies.

Worse yet, there is a hungry stray dog that has found his way into the house and has begun to pull the meat off of the corpse to eat.

At this point, it becomes a survival story for Jesse, who begins to hallucinate conversations with Gerald and with herself.  She also starts to remember something horrible that happened to her as a young girl.

Did I mention that I was unsettled?

Carla Gugino was amazing in this role.  She brought all kinds of tension and suspense into the situation and you really feel for her.  You believe that she is in a panic to try to find a way to free herself while she still could and you can see how she is slowly losing it.

And I really hated that dog.

Then, thanks to those flashbacks, the film became, dare I say it, creepier.  I think I felt my skin crawl several times.  Henry Thomas (yes, Elliott from ET) is just as horrendous as any character in any film this year.  Thomas does a magnificent job.  I hated him more than the dog.

As the film continued, it only got tougher to watch.  I could feel the stress with each worse moment that would happen to Jesse.

Then, when I thought it couldn’t get any worse, a weird character shows up and brings that level of tension even higher.  You don’t know if he is just a figment of her dehydrated imagination or something even more sinister.

There are a lot of emotions that the viewer of this film goes through and they are well earned.  There are several moments when I have to turn my head away because it was just too brutal to watch.  I cared for this character and I wanted things to work out for her.

This is a great Stephen King film that really works you over.  This is a tough watch, but I truly respected the journey. This is a character study and there is no jump scares.  The scares are well earned.

And be ready to be unsettled.

4.5 stars

Sometimes a film can get by with an interesting concept but not much else.

This is not one of those times.

The new remake of the 1990 film Flatliners arrived in theaters this weekend already D.O.A. and no amount of resuscitation would help this film’s heart to keep beating.

I am sure that I am not the only movie reviewer to start off their review of Flatliners with some bad puns, because that is about what this remake is worth.  Originally, there had been some rumors that, because we saw that Kiefer Sutherland, who appeared in the original film, was in this as well, it was actually a sequel to the first film.  You can put that rumor to rest.  Flatlines is not a sequel but a lukewarm and, at many times, dull remake of the Kiefer Sutherland-Julia Roberts film.

The idea is sound.  A group of medical students get together to try and discover the secrets of the afterlife by having the others stop their hearts  so their brain responses to the “near-death experience” could be recorded and studied.  Courtney (Ellen Page) started the experiments and recruited other interns Sophia (Kiersey Clemons) and Jamie (James Norton) to help.  When it appeared as if Courtney was not going to be revived from her trip into death, they called on the help of Ray (Diego Luna) and Marlo (Nina Dobreva).  When Courtney returned to the world of the living, she seemed to have re-wired her brain and she could do many new and sparkly things and the others wanted their turn.

Little did they know that there was something dark and sinister waiting for them when they returned.

So much of this new version of Flatliners makes no sense and there are characters who do certain actions that are, simply put, stupid choices that only are made to further the plot.  No normal human being would make some of the decisions that these obviously stupid reason-for-malpractice-insurance group of doctors would make.

Let’s look at Ray, whom I actually did like.  At first when he found out about the experiment, he was all “you can’ do that” and then he joined them again.  After that he was partying with them, doing shots, but he was still not sure if this was anything but silliness.  Still, he was right there with the group each time.  He was flip-flopping all over the place taking away any credibility the character may have had.

The film starts with a really dumb car crash that is supposed to provide Courtney with a motive to pursue this experiment, but it does not sufficiently provide said motivation.  In fact, it is only meant to be more confusing.

The dialogue was terrible, bordering on laughable.  No human beings speak like that.  It joins in with the weakness in story, plot and conclusion.  The ending is totally a joke.  We never really understand what the dark force that was trying to kill these flatliners was… except it went away fairly easily.   There was an interesting possible story here, but the film seemed to do anything it could to avoid telling it.

The characters were all unlikable, except perhaps for Courtney because she was being played by the strong actress Ellen Page.  The rest of the crew were average to below average.

Worse yet, the film makers tried to throw a bunch of jump scares into the movie to ratchet up the intensity level, but none of them were anything but your typical, low-budget horror movie jump scares that you see a hundred times during a year.  There was nothing special about these scares.

I do not remember much about the original Flatliners movie.  I do believe I saw it, but it did not stick with me much.  Perhaps I should revisit it to see how much better it is than this film.  It has to be better than this film.  The new version of Flatliners was a bad movie.

1.2 stars

Jake Gyllenhaal is truly one of the best actors we have today.  He is consistently performing at high levels no matter what the film or how meaty a role.

Well, in the new biopic Stronger, Gyllenhaal has a real meaty role as Jeff Bauman, one of the victims of the Boston Marathon bombing.  Bauman lost both of his legs in the terror attack, but he still was able to provide police with a description of the bomber, helping to bring the killers to justice.  Because of his actions despite his tragic loss, Bauman became an inspiration to many people, particularly in Boston where he was referred to as “Boston Strong.”

This was one of the problems.

In the film, we see Bauman struggling not only with the loss of his legs, which was certainly enough of a challenge, but also struggling with the concept of people looking up to him or being inspired by him.  Bauman could not understand why these people were turning him into a hero and felt confused as to the reasoning.  This was one of the most intriguing aspects of this film because it was something that we hadn’t seen before.

Gyllenhaal was again spectacular in this role.  He has a remarkable skill of being able to lose himself in a role.  Most big stars, even in good performances, are basically that star.  Every time you see a Tom Cruise movie, Tom Cruise is basically playing a version of himself (yes, there are exceptions, but you get the idea).  Gyllenhaal, on the other hand, is like a chameleon in a way because I never once looked at this movie and thought to myself, “hey, it is Jake Gyllenhaal acting.”  Instead, he was the character he was playing.  Nightcrawler is another brilliant example of a time when Jake becomes more than his star.

Tatiana Maslany, from Orphan Black fame, played Bauman’s girlfriend Erin and she does a magnificent job as well.  The movie does a fantastic job of not only showing how this injury affected Bauman, but also how it affected the people in his life, especially Erin.  This relationship felt real and was another strength of this movie.

The story is very powerful and can hit hard many times.  There are a lot of emotional blows throughout the film that do not feel exploitative.

The film is also very much a love letter to Boston.  Boston Strong is a huge theme moving through the movie and the background actors are very realistic in their Boston behaviors.

Stronger is a really great film with a fantastic pair of performances from Jake Gyllenhaal and Tatiana Maslany.  It is an emotional ride in a serious and troubling manner.  It might be a little too long and there may have been too much of Bauman’s family involved in the story, but the film wisely takes its time to develop the characters that we really need to see.  Jeff Bauman did not feel comfortable being the symbol of hope to the people of Boston and it nearly destroyed him.

4 stars

One of the most infamous moments in sports history of the 1970s is being analyzed in the new film, Battle of the Sexes, starring Steve Carell and Emma Stone.

Of course the moment I am talking about is the tennis match between Women’s tennis star Billie Jean King and senior tour and former tennis legend Bobby Riggs.  The match between these two was at the center point of the argument of equality of the sexes in sports and in society, an argument that we are still having today.

Bobby Riggs (Steve Carell) has become a hustler, someone using his great skills in tennis to con his friends out of money.  A obsessive gambler, Riggs was always looking to find that next big money making opportunity.  When a dispute between Billie Jean King and Jack Kramer (Bill Pullman) led to King pulling out of the tennis organization to create another one, Riggs saw an opportunity.  He challenge King to a one-on-one battle of the sexes.

King refused and continued on with her career, but when Women Tennis #1 player in the world Margaret Court (Jessica McNamee) accepted and was defeated by Riggs, Billie Jean felt as if she had no choice but to defend women tennis players everywhere from the self-referred “chauvinist pig” in Riggs.

The film features much more than just the match though.  It deals with both individual characters and their lives in great deal, especially the struggle of Billie Jean King trying to deal with her sexual status.  Though married, King had an affair with a hairdresser Marilyn (Andrea Riseborough) and she found herself distracted and confused.

Riggs, on the other hand, had to deal with his gambling that took a toll on his own family, in particular, his crumbling marriage to his wife Priscilla (Elizabeth Shue).  Riggs is portrayed very interestingly here as he seemed to be a showman, and I even thought for part of the time that he did not actually believe the garbage that he was spewing.

One of the most fascinating parts of this film was the historical setting that the film took place within as the attitude of men when dealing with women at the time was astounding.  Someone like Jack Kramer is out and out a chauvinist and he said things that were shockingly rude, and yet was typical of the time.  We even heard words of condescension from Howard Cosell, who actually called the match for ABC.  Though there are still many issues when dealing with women’s rights and the equality of the sexes, seeing how the world was at this time was a real eye opener.

I did find that the film dragged a little bit during the middle of the film and I am not sure that I ever truly bought the relationship between King and Marilyn as portrayed here.

The true strength of this movie is the performances of its two lead actors.  Steve Carell and Emma Stone are wonderful here and I would have liked to see even more of the interactions between them.  I think Carell in particular brought the charismatic and enigmatic Bobby Riggs to life on the screen and you find yourself rooting for him.  He was not just the misogynistic villain of the film, but instead a real person that you can’t help but like.

The tennis scenes at the end of the movie are tremendous and really put a strong mark on the film itself.

Battle of the Sexes shines a light on a really amazing time in the world of sports as Billie Jean King took a huge stand against the tennis establishment and brought along with her an entire generation of women libbers.

3.7 stars