The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes

This was a prequel that I never thought that I wanted. To see the trailers leading up to this film, I was just not interested. It felt as if the Hunger Games had really been played out and did not need anything more. Certainly not a prequel focusing on Coriolanus Snow, the villain of the Hunger Games trilogy.

However, after seeing the movie, I can see the purpose behind the film, and I enjoyed it, for part of it at least.

We see Coriolanus Snow (Tom Blyth) who becomes a mentor for one of the tributes in the tenth annual Hunger Games. His tribute was Lucy Gray Baird (Rachel Zegler). Snow was looking to advance in the society and gave ideas to change and adapt the Hunger Games to Dr. Volumnia Gaul, the creator of the games.

Trying to get Lucy Gray to be more engaging, Snow started to bond with the girl. He did whatever he could to help her survive the games.

I really liked the first hour and forty five minutes of this movie. The first two acts were tremendous and I was thoroughly entertained. Unfortunately, the third act was added on and felt totally like a different movie. The characters seemed different than they were in the first two acts and I did not like the ending near as well.

It also became very long. The second act (or split into chapters as the film does) seemed like a perfect ending for the film, but suddenly, we got another 45 minutes and, I am sorry to say, I felt it.

I think Rachel Zegler is a star. She is fantastic though the entire prequel and she did have chemistry with Tom Blyth. Unfortunately, the pairing of Snow and Lucy Gray seemed to happen too quickly for any sort of romantic pairing. Both actors did a sensational job with their performances though.

Viola Davis was great too, with her extremely creepy portrayal of Dr. Gaul. She was a great villain in this role, and turned out to be a considerable mentor for Snow.

The look of the film was great. The CGI and the action were top line and the section with the actual 10th Annual Hunger Games was clearly the standout section of the movie. I just did not like the third act. It felt out of place and dragged the movie along.

I still enjoyed the film. It just felt like I saw two completely different movies, with the first two acts being compelling and thrilling and the third act being drawn out and different than what we had seen in the first two. Still, overall, I think the movie was able to justify its existence.

3.6 stars

The Longest Day (1962)

November 11th is recognized as Veterans Day in the US and, in honor of the day, I watched one of the classic films of the 1960s that I had never seen before. It told the story of D-Day, the Allied forces storming the beaches of Normandy. It was called The Longest Day.

An unbelievable cast of stars and recognizable actors littered this film. The cast included John Wayne, Robert Mitchum, Eddie Albert, Sean Connery, Henry Fonda, Richard Todd, Robert Ryan, Richard Burton, George Segal, Paul Anka, Red Buttons, Robert Wagner, Rod Steiger, Peter Lawford, Richard Beymer, Steve Forrest, Ray Danton, Sal Mineo, Jeffrey Hunter, Arletty, Fabian, Roddy McDowell, Alexander Knox, Irina Demick, Hans Christian Blech, Bourvil, Donald Houston, Curd Jürgens, Stuart Whitman, Richard Dawson, Bernard Fox, Gary Collins, Georges Wilson, Peter van Eyck, Tom Tryon, Jean Servais, Tommy Sands, Norman Rossington, Madeleine Renaud, Wolfgang Preiss, Kenneth More, Richard Münch, Michael Medwin, Dewey Martin, Christian Marquand, Karl John, Werner Hinz, Peter Helm, Paul Hartmann, Leo Genn, Gert Fröbe, Mel Ferrer, and Ron Randell.

The Longest Day is a fairly realistic and accurate retelling of the invasion of 1944 by the Allied forces. The battles of the invasion were rendered extremely well for 1962, and I am sure that those survivors of the actual D-Day invasion had some difficulties watching this recreation. While we do not get the gore or blood of say Saving Private Ryan or other more recent war films, this does not shy away from shocking imagery and depends on the psychological more than just seeing the carnage associated with it.

It is a three hour movie, but to be honest, I felt like it moved extremely well. I did not feel the length of the film and there were enough separate characters and storylines to keep me engaged through the whole of the film.

An epic presentation of one of World War II’s most seminal moments. An amazing cast and some powerful imagery really helps to make this a total classic in American cinema. I am not a general fan of war movies, but this was really near the top of the list.

Happy Veterans Day. Thank you to all the veterans who gave their time, efforts, and, in some cases, lives to make sure that we have the freedom we live with in this country. Thank you for your service.

The Killer

David Fincher returned with his latest film that has been in select theaters and debuted on Netflix this weekend.

Michael Fassbender played the Killer, an assassin who missed his most recent target and had to face the consequences for failure.

After his girlfriend is attacked in response, Fassbender methodically started on a quest for vengeance against everyone that was involved in the attack, even adjacently.

Honestly, the story of the movie is pretty simple. Fassbender does a voice over narration but his character says almost zero lines of dialogue through the film. We follow this man who is clearly anything but your typical protagonist as he brutally and without passion executed person after person.

Fassbender is a likable actor and that helps make this assassin human, because his actions are anything but. The voice over repeats the Killer’s mantra before every kill, reminding himself to stick to the plan, and that empathy is weakness.

Fassbender is excellent in this role. It seems to fit him beautifully. Again, he is the standout of the movie because the simplistic plot is only somewhat engaging and the dialogue is nearly non-existent.

Tilda Swinton makes an appearance as one of the eventual targets and her short time on screen was excellent as always. However, we know so little about her character that it does not give us much to feel with her eventual fate.

There is an effective use of tone and mood in this piece, but it is a surprisingly sleight film.

3.6 stars

The Marvels

There have been a lot of negative comments about the latest MCU film, The Marvels from the reviewers that I usually listen to or follow. And I understand perfectly that I am more likely to like this than most people considering my background with Marvel. To call me the target audience would not be a stretch. I have also been a fan of almost everything Marvel Studios has put out (I’m looking at you, Secret Invasion).

So going into The Marvels with a little trepidation because of the reviews (even though it is currently at 61% on Rotten Tomatoes, so considered FRESH), I was nervous.

I am pleased to say that I thought this was a lot of fun and that I enjoyed myself watching it. It is definitely messier than many of the other Marvel Studios movies, but, for me, that did not distract from the key of this film.

That key is the three lead women of the film, Carol Danvers aka Captain Marvel, Monica Rambeau, and Kamala Khan aka Ms. Marvel. Brie Larson, Teyonah Parris and Iman Vellani have such an easy chemistry with each other and they are truly well written. Iman Vellani is a joy and she is charming. She was great in the Ms. Marvel Disney + series and they bring her right into this without skipping a beat. I really believe that Iman Vellani can be the next face of the MCU if done properly. She is a star.

I did enjoy the conflicts that were there between the leading ladies, especially with Carol and Monica. It just felt as if these conflicts were too surface level and could have been deeper and were dealt with too quickly.

They also included Kamala’s family, actors Saagar Shaikh, Zenobia Shroff, and Mohan Kapur, in The Marvels. While it was great to see them again and they did provide some wonderful moments grounding the character bits with Kamala, but they were part of the messy aspects of the film too as Nick Fury brought them aboard the spaceship for some reason.

I have heard a couple critics talk about two major things that were too silly, and ruined the tone of the film. I think a big reason why you may not like this movie is that these two moments bother you. Those who want more serious superhero movies or who may not believe the humor worked well will probably allude to these scenes as the ones that ruin the film. For me, neither of these moments (one deals with cats, one deals with music) bothered me in the slightest, but I have never been opposed to some silliness in my superhero movies.

The villain of The Marvels was Kree warrior Dar-Benn, played by Zawe Ashton, was admittedly weak. There was not a ton of development for her, much like Ronan the Accuser, her predecessor, was in Guardians of the Galaxy. She did have motives that were potentially good, but she was approaching this in too much of a vengeful manner. There have been considerably better villains in the MCU than Dar-Benn.

The special effects of the film were up and down. Much of the CGI was really good, but there were enough moments that stick out to notice.

The last scene of the movie is really like a post credit scene and involves a great cameo that I did not expect to see but was totally welcomed. Meanwhile, the actual mid-credit scene had a cameo that had been spoiled for me, but it opened up a huge area for the MCU.

One problem here is that if you had not watched the Ms. Marvel or WandaVision Disney + shows, you would be more confused than you should be. That is, again, not a problem for me considering that I watch all of these Marvel Disney + shows. However, the normal film goers might struggle at times with the new characters. The film does an okay job of letting us know who these characters are and some details, but it just has a lot to get through considering Monica was involved in 9 episodes of WandaVision and Ms. Marvel had 6 episodes of her own show. I do think that is an issue that Marvel Studios needs to address moving forward.

I enjoyed this movie quite a bit. Iman Vellani was wonderful and I liked both Brie Larson and Teyonah Parris too. There are a lot of Goose the cat (actually the Flerken). The Marvels had its messy moments but it was fun and entertaining.

4 stars

Priscilla

Based on the novel Elvis and Me by Priscilla Presley, Priscilla becomes the latest film featuring a story with the King of Rock-N-Roll, Elvis Presley.

However, this time, the film is not specifically about Elvis. The protagonist of this film is Priscilla.

We start the film during the time when Elvis (Jacob Elordi) was in the army and in Germany. During this period, he met 14-year old Priscilla (Cailee Spaeny). These two hit it off, even though Elvis was considerably older than Priscilla. We saw how the pair of them grew closer as Priscilla continued at her school in Germany.

Eventually, Elvis convinced Priscilla’s father (Ari Cohen) to allow Priscilla to come to Memphis to finish school. He said that she would be looked after by his family and staff. Somehow, the father agreed to this. I guess when you are Elvis, you get things done.

The film, directed by Sophia Coppola, continued to follow Priscilla through the years, showing the tribulations of this first love mixing with toxic stardom.

This is absolutely the darkest presentation I have ever seen in reference to Elvis Presley. So much so that I might actually call him the antagonist of the film. Elvis was portrayed as a manipulative, control-freak that insisted on certain things that he expected Priscilla to do, to the point where Priscilla was becoming lost inside her own life.

I found a lot of these scenes very fascinating, although, prior to her death earlier this year, Lisa Marie Presley, Elvis and Priscilla’s daughter, complained about the characterization of her father in the script.

The performances were very strong, in particular Cailee Spaeny and Jacob Elordi. Elordi’s performance was probably the most difficult since there was just recently an Oscar nominated portrayal of Elvis (from Austin Butler in Baz Luhrmann’s 2022 Elvis) and Elordi does a great job of doing something different and not just doing a copy.

I do feel as if there is something missing from the narrative of this film. The ending comes to an end suddenly and did not feel as if it built up to make sense. It seemed as if it needed something more than where it left off because the ending did leave me flat.

There were also a lot of scenes that felt as if it could have been trimmed from the script. There were several moments where I was not sure the purpose for the inclusion of certain scenes in the film and that there were other moments that could have done a better job of spelling out the ideas that Coppola wanted to get through to the audience. Sadly, by the last part of the movie, I was becoming kind of bored.

So I feel the performances were decent and the look at the relationship gave us something new between the two main characters, but I just did not feel the proper development of a narrative and there was too much that did not work. While it is not a terrible film by any stretch, Priscilla could have been so much more.

2.8 stars

The Beatles- Now and Then- The Last Beatles Song

With the new Beatles song dropping today, which I had not heard of until today, I discovered that there was also a short which I watched on YouTube.

It was the story of how Paul and Ringo came back and finished a song that had been on the tapes that Yoko Ono had given to them back in the 1990s that led to “Free as a Bird.”

Listening to Paul tell this story was truly emotional and had me feeling as if I were ready to sob. This film is only 12 + minutes long, but it was amazing.

This has been my favorite short in years. It made me feel and I was utterly fascinated by the story of Now and Then, the “last” Beatles song, a song that included John Lennon’s vocals, Paul on bass, Ringo on drums and a mix that included George on a guitar solo.

You are able to get a song that includes all four former Beatles, despite the fact that two of them are gone. For Beatles fans like me, this short is magnificent. I think that even those people who are only slight fans will love seeing how they were able to create this song.

Go out of the way to see this.

5 stars

Edit: I see that this is also on Disney +, which surprises me that I was able to see this short on YouTube.

Fair Play

A film that has been on my “To Watch” list for a few weeks now has been the 2023 drama Fair Play. It has been on Netflix and today was the day that I finally got the chance to watch it. This one was quite brutal and turned really ugly.

Emily (Phoebe Dynevor) and Luke (Alden Ehrenreich), who work together at a cutthroat hedge fund, were in love and became engaged to be married. Since they worked together, they were going to wait for the perfect time to let people know.

That perfect time did not come as an unexpected promotion at work started to create tension between the two ambitious people.

Watching these two individuals who had been in such a positive place at the beginning of the movie devolve into a brutal, toxic relationship was tough. The couple started slowly, with resentment being forced down, but the anger and frustration was never going to stay hidden and it was obvious to the audience that this engagement was doomed.

Both of our lead actors, Dynevor and Ehrenreich did a spectacular job playing the emotions that they were burying inside of them. As communication broke down, mistrust started filling the emptiness.

This is not a movie I would throw on to have a pick me up. It is most definitely a downer of a story, but it is extremely well told and acted. It is one of those movies that I would admire, but never want to see again.

3.5 stars

It Lives Inside

I missed this horror movie when it was in the theaters, and I have not rented it on Vudu while the price was high. I found out that this movie, It Lives Inside, had dropped the price on Vudu down to a more realistic amount and so I rented it this weekend. I am certainly glad that I did not spend 19.99 to rent this one.

I found this movie to be pretty boring for much of the runtime. The third act wasn’t too bad, but, in my mind, this movie could have been more scary had they spent less time showing us this monster.

According to IMDB, “Sam (Megan Suri), an Indian-American teen, lives in an idyllic suburb with her conservative mother (Neeru Bajwa) and her assimilated father (Vik Sahay). Sam’s cultural insecurities grow due to her estranged friend, Tamira (Mohana Krishnan), who mysteriously carries around an empty mason jar all the time. In a moment of anger, Sam breaks Tamira’s jar and unleashes an ancient Indian demonic force that kidnaps Tamira. Sam searches for Tamira, following the trail of a young man who performed a deadly ritual, until the demonic entity starts targeting her, murdering her boyfriend and shattering her reality with terrifying visions. Sam must band together with her parents and a sympathetic teacher (Betty Gabriel) to save Tamira and put an end to the terror of the demon.

Megan Suri does a good job as the lead protagonist. She is an interesting actor and does not seem that she fits as the lead.

I like the idea that the monster was more specific to the culture of Indian-America, but much of the story was fairly typical. Nothing about this stands out in the horror genre.

It Lives Inside is not the worst movie of the year by far, but it is not a great one either. I’m glad I waited to see it.

2.3 stars

Five Nights at Freddy’s

The brand new video game adaptation was released this week. It is called Five Nights at Freddy’s. I originally was planning to go to the theater to see this, but I discovered that it is also streaming day and date on Peacock so I decided to save myself some gas, make it a weekend lounging at home, and watch it on the streaming service.

I’m glad I did not drive down to the Quad Cities to watch this because it was not that enjoyable.

I have no background with the video game, but, for me, there was a better version of this released a few years ago starring Nicolas Cage that was called Willy’s Wonderland. It is not a literal adaptation, but the idea is very close.

Five Night’s at Freddy’s starred Josh Hutcherson (from Hunger Games fame) as Mike, a troubled man struggling to overcome a haunting memory from his youth and take care of his little sister Abby (Piper Rubio). As part of a way to move forward, Mike is hired by Steve raglan (Matthew Lillard) as a security guard for a closed down restaurant that had been popular in the 1980s. His job, just keep people out.

Desperate to discover the truth of his younger brother, Mike found that the animatronics from the restaurant where more than what they seemed.

Overall, the story in this movie was messy, did not have enough moments that paid off for what it as asking us to watch and included a bizarre ending that felt out of place.

Hutcherson’s character did not give us the required emotional depth for us to really connect to him. I never believed in this character’s arc and found him to be disposable. Hutcherson did not elevate this role with his performance.

The movie featured a lot of dull moments with the monstrous animatronics really being regulated in the film. There were a few fun horror moments, but nowhere near as creative or enjoyable as it should have been.

The film added a character named Vanessa (Elizabeth Lail) who was absolutely terrible and the film utterly wasted Mary Stuart Masterson in a throwaway ‘evil aunt’ character that was completely unnecessary and one-dimensional.

I have seen comments on how this could be used to introduce kids to horror. To that I would say that there are considerably smarter movies and TV shows that would do that better than this.

I was disappointed at Five Night’s at Freddy’s as I hoped that this would be more than what it was. Watch Willy’s Wonderland instead.

2.4 stars

Apostle (2018)

The October 13 of 13

So The October 13, the watch of thirteen horror/Halloween/thriller movies that I had not written a review for on the site, comes to an end with the final listed film, the Netflix film called Apostle starring Dan Stevens.

According to IMDB, “The year is 1905. Thomas Richardson (Dan Stevens) travels to a remote island to rescue his sister after she’s kidnapped by a mysterious religious cult demanding a ransom for her safe return. It soon becomes clear that the cult will regret the day it baited this man, as he digs deeper and deeper into the secrets and lies upon which the commune is built

The first feeling, vibe, I got from this film was that it reminded me of The Wicker Man. This turned even more brutal and certainly avoided the hammy clichés of the Nicolas Cage’s movie.

This started really slow. In fact, almost an hour in, I was not finding much to enjoy in Apostle. Dan Stevens is always solid and his performance was basically what was keeping me with the film.

When things picked up, there was some horrific scenes involving a father and his daughter that were shocking and disturbing. It was at this point that I found myself more invested than I had been at any point prior to this.

The third act of this film was brutal and bloody, with some horrific imagery that pushed the story into a new level. However, I am not sure that I enjoyed the resolution of this film.

This wrapped up The October 13 with a bit of a downer. Apostle had some ups, but I’m not sure there are enough ups to recommend it.

Totally Killer

“Time travel! … What? I see this as an absolute win.” – Bruce Banner, Avengers: Endgame.

Time travel movies are crazy. And they all have rules that change. Back to the Future. Avengers Endgame. LOST. 12 Monkeys. Dozens more.

You can add another time travel movie to the list with the film Totally Killer, which is available on Prime. And it is a total hoot.

This was a really fun and inventive movie with a lot of humor and creativity. Does the time travel rules get broken? Oh yeah. Are there a few weird plot points that do not make sense? Sure. Did they leave a dangling plot or two? Yes. But I had an absolute blast watching it and was totally engaged all the way through.

According to IMDB, “When the infamous ‘Sweet Sixteen Killer’ returns 35 years after his first murder spree to claim another victim, 17-year-old Jamie (Kiernan Shipka) accidentally travels back in time to 1987, determined to stop the killer before he can start.

Kiernan Shipka was great as out protagonist who was desperately running around in the past trying to use the information that she knew in order to prevent the three killings and to change the future that she left.

The film wisely alluded to several of the time travel movies, comparing what was going on to the situation they were in. Every time Jamie made an allusion to a movie, she was like the audience, who must have been thinking the same thing.

The final showdown with the killer was not the best moment of the film, but it did not detract from the overall enjoyment of the film. I have said this before, but when a film is funny, it gets extra grace when dealing with storyline. This movie was funny.

Some of the best jokes were about the 1980s and how people kept doing things that she thought, in her 2023 mindset, was just crazy or dangerous. There was a scene with the red rubber dodgeballs that I literally screamed out about. Our generation knew what it was like to be hit in the face with those red dodgeballs and get past it. That does not happen in today’s schools.

This film knows that it is silly and slight, and it plays into it big time. By doing so, they have given us a spectacularly good time in a film that is like Back to the Future combined with Scream combined with Happy Death Day. I loved this.

4.5 stars

Jennifer’s Body (2009)

The October 12 of 13

The penultimate film in the October 13th watch was a horror/comedy called Jennifer’s Body, which featured performances from Megan Fox and Amanda Seyfried.

This one was up and down for me. There were things that I thought were clever and enjoyable, but there were other aspects of the film that I found disappointing and dumb.

I really liked the relationship between Seyfried’s Needy and her boyfriend Chip (Johnny Simmons). I thought that relationship defied the typical relationship you would see in a teen film and I thought they had a rooting interest. I was very unhappy with the resolution of this coupling.

Megan Fox was actually pretty good in this role, even if a lot of it was dumb. Fox as a demon-possessed creature oddly fit.

Unlike some of the other films I have seen lately, this one’s conclusion was much better and provided some satisfaction after much of the disappointment of the story up until this point.

The film was lacking any real funny moments as I may have laughed once. The scares were almost minimal as it just depended on having some blood on Megan Fox or having her make scary faces when she attacked her victims.

The parents and teachers (especially the terrible wigged up version of JK Simmons) were so lost and were lacking in this story at all. Everything was so unbelievable that when the parts that were supposed to be normal is difficult to believe, the fantastical isn’t going to work either.

This is not the worst movie I have watched during the October 13, but it is down the list for sure.

Saw (2004)

The October 11 of 13

I have never had any interest in the Saw franchise. The torture/gore films do not appeal to me and I have always connected the Saw franchise to that form of movie.

However, I decided that this movie watch, The October 13, I would give the original Saw a try. I had heard that this was the best of the franchise and did not resemble the gore fests of the sequels that followed it. So I added it to the list.

Who would have thought… I liked this a lot.

For me, the film benefited from its cast because it featured Cary Elwes, whom I loved from The Princess Bride, Danny Glover (whose inclusion surprised me), and two of my favorites from LOST, Ken Leung (who played Miles) and Ben Linus himself, Michael Emerson.

The film also did not include nearly as much gore and torture scenes as I expected. It was there, but it was more psychological torture than anything else. It felt like the graphic scenes all were earned and not just tossed in for a gross-out quota.

Unfortunately, I knew the answer to the twist of the film because I had seen the previews for Saw X which was out this year (and I have not seen) and I knew the actor who was behind Jigsaw. I wished I had not known that because it did affect my viewing of this.

Some of the storytelling aspects of the film was confusing, especially the flashback sequences which kept the narrative from being told in a typical structure. While that is usually a cool feature, this caused more confusion as I was not sure when the events were taking place and in what order we were supposed to put them in. Still, I give director James Wan credit for trying to frame the story in a different manner than other slasher films.

I did not like the ending scene of the film as it felt tacked on or unsatisfying. I found that it really stretched credibility of the film that already required a lot of stretching. Plus, I did not like the way they left everything up in the air and how we really do not know the fate of some of the characters involved.

In the end, I was impressed overall with Saw and I am pleased that I watched it. It was a much better film than I thought it was going to be. However, I do not plan on watching any of the other, universally panned sequels that followed this.

The Amityville Horror (1979)

The October 10 of 13

How is a film that is so well-known and iconic this bad?

The Amityville Horror was made in 1979 based on a “true” story. It is one of the most famous haunted house movies of all time. Yet, this was not a good movie.

It was so silly at many times that it undercut whatever tension and anxiety it tried to build into the mood.

I would give credit to James Brolin and Margot Kidder, who played George and Kathy Lutz- the newly married couple who moved into the house where a brutal murder of a family took place. Brolin and Kidder did what they could and they certainly committed to the story. They were not the problem and they may be the reason why this stinker has passed the test of time.

Of course, Brolin’s axe into the bathroom door came a year before Jack Nicholson’s far superior axe job in The Shining. Brolin snapped out of his trans fairly quickly so maybe Jack needs to take some notes from him.

The same could not be said for Rod Steiger, whose performance as Father Delaney was so far beyond over-the-top that his entire screaming monologues become laughable.

The ending was both sudden and ridiculous. George Lutz was a much better person than I am because I would be going dog shopping for a new dog instead of running back into that insanity. And why did he fall into that huge pool of blood? Where did that come from?

It felt as if the film had a bunch of subplots that never really came together in the movie.

It may be iconic, but that does not make it something you should watch again. Bad movie.

Killers of the Flower Moon

The newest epic film from Martin Scorsese was widely released this weekend, based on a true story. The film is entitled Killers of the Flower Moon and it is set just after World War I in Oklahoma and featured the Osage nation.

The Indians of the Osage nation discovered that there was oil beneath their land and they became incredibly wealthy. However, this led to a series of deaths and murders of the Osage people in an attempt to get the land and oil money away from them.

Ernest Burkhart (Leonardo DiCaprio) returned from the war to go work for his uncle, William “King” Hale (Robert DeNiro). He met up with one of the Osage Indians from the family that owned the land, Mollie (Lily Gladstone), fell for her and married her. There was some inkling early in the film that perhaps he had married her for the oil.

As their life together progressed, other members of her family started dying off in suspicious manners. It became clear that Hale had been calling the shots and had been using Ernest to do his dirty work along with several other men.

I will say that I thought this film was good. I was not as blown away by it as I thought I might be. There are a lot of strong parts of the movie that just have enough problems to keep it from being a masterful film.

One issue is that the film does feel its length at times. Killers of the Flower Moon is nearly three and a half hours long, which is a marathon of a film and it is not brimmed full with action or dramatic moments. It is definitely a slow burn. Even though I think the film works as a slow burn, I do think they could have condensed some of the scenes in the middle to trim off 10-15 minutes and it would be for the film’s benefit.

Another major issue I had is a spoiler so I will have to just touch on it generally. It feels like something that is a creative swing that may work for some people, but that will be a problem for other. I fall into the latter category. This is the conclusion or the wrap up of the story. The way they wrapped up the movie did not work for me at all and I even think it damaged the narrative that had been constructed.

Positives of the film included some excellent acting. Standout performances came from Lily Gladstone, Leonardo DiCaprio and Robert DeNiro. Lily Gladstone has been called the heart of the picture, and I can see why. She does an amazing job as Mollie, a woman suffering form the pain of losing family members while dealing with her own health issues. You could feel for her constantly as she tried to take strength from her marriage, despite her husband being a conflicted a-hole.

That a-hole was Leonardo DiCaprio, who does a really great job playing this conflicted and manipulated man. Truly, I found my own opinions on Ernest to be filled with hatred as he continued to make poor choices in betrayal of his wife and her family all for the money.

This was the best performance of Robert DeNiro has given in years. His portrayal of William Hale is creepy and full of sinister behavior as he manipulates everyone to do what he wants them to do.

The technical aspects of Killers of the Flower Moon was exceptional. The film looked great and the directorial job from Scorsese is awesome.

This movie is good, but not great. Th length can be an issue, but it is a interesting story with some top notch performances.

3.5 stars