Mufasa: The Lion King

When the 2019 Lion King “live-action” remake broke the billion dollar club at the box office, you should have known that we were getting something more. My guess is that Mufasa: The Lion King will not be the same kind of demand.

Mufasa: The Lion King from Disney came out this weekend. The film was directed by Barry Jenkins and featured a “live-action” cast of CGI animals in a CGI generated African land. How this could be considered a “live-action” film is up for an argument.

Unfortunately, I did not like the 2019 remake of the Lion King and I am not a huge fan of this new film either. I do think that this film is better than the 2019 version. Specifically because this film does a better job of avoiding the uncanny valley of the 2019 film. Those lion characters in 2019 did not show us any emotion on their faces at all, lacking any ability to emote, making them all seem very distant from the audience. That is considerably better with this movie.

In fact, the strength of Mufasa: The Lion King is easily the CGI. This film looks absolutely gorgeous and it has some of the most realistic artwork that you are ever going to see in a film. In fact, I could see people claiming that some of these animals were real and not contrived on an artist’s board.

I did have some major issues with Mufasa: The Lion King, most notably that there was not much new in the story. It was basically the origin story of Mufasa and Scar as the two lions went on an adventure and met other characters from the original Lion King. Not much else.

There was a devise used to tell the story with Rafiki (John Kani) telling the story to Simba’s daughter Kiara (Blue Ivy Carter), Timon (Billy Eichner) and Pumbaa (Seth Rogan) which was a total waste of time. Nothing that happened in this framing device was funny or worth taking away from the main story.

I also thought that the sound mixing was horrendous. Perhaps this is the theater I was in, but I had trouble hearing a lot of the dialogue because the music in the background was playing so loudly or dominating the moment of the scene. Speaking of the music, I did not find any of the songs interesting or song that I would remember later. Even the songs written by Lin-Manuel Miranda were unremarkable. They were fine when watching it, but there is not one song that I can recall as of this minute.

Mufasa: The Lion King had its moments for sure. It is a stunning accomplishment of visual arts, but there just seems to be little else that makes this an important story to tell. While it is not a waste of time, it is anything but a great movie.

2.8 stars

3 thoughts on “Mufasa: The Lion King

  1. Interesting review. I heard this prequel wasn’t so great and they made crazy retcons like how Mufasa and Scar aren’t blood related anymore which makes the “Hamlet with lions” argument even more shallow. People were telling me that there were white lion villains which is insane and hard not to think they were potshots against Jungle Emperor Leo/Kimba the White Lion which predates The Lion King by decades. Even the retcon of Scar getting his left eye scarred by Kiros is mind-blowing because Claw from Kimba is the evil black-maned dark furred lion usurper with hyena henchmen in that anime got his eye scarred by Kimba’s dad Caesar so both lion villains were scarred by white lions which is so oddly specific of a situation. However, my issues with this franchise are more so with the cultural flattening, “Africa is a Country” tropes, Mufasa’s protagonist centered morality (I heard he killed more lions than what Scar did in getting the throne in this prequel) like the apartheid situation he put the hyenas in, finding out what they got wrong with the Swahili language or mixing unrelated African languages since I’m learning Swahili, and the bigoted implications of the hyenas. I appreciate the honesty and not being a sycophant for Disney in this example. I also agree that this prequel and the remake have no business being called live action since it’s CGI and there are literally no humans there.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I would consider myself a fan of Disney, but I can certainly set that aside if the product is not what I like. I am a bit more biased when dealing with Marvel to be fair.

      Thank you for your intricate comments. I love people’s thoughts.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Understood. I know I mentioned a few of those issues before in that villains list you did, but I learned more things years after the fact. That’s fine about Marvel. I used to be really into Marvel when I was a kid, before the MCU was a thing.

        No problem. Hoped the comment was insightful.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Doc Cancel reply