Fair Play

A film that has been on my “To Watch” list for a few weeks now has been the 2023 drama Fair Play. It has been on Netflix and today was the day that I finally got the chance to watch it. This one was quite brutal and turned really ugly.

Emily (Phoebe Dynevor) and Luke (Alden Ehrenreich), who work together at a cutthroat hedge fund, were in love and became engaged to be married. Since they worked together, they were going to wait for the perfect time to let people know.

That perfect time did not come as an unexpected promotion at work started to create tension between the two ambitious people.

Watching these two individuals who had been in such a positive place at the beginning of the movie devolve into a brutal, toxic relationship was tough. The couple started slowly, with resentment being forced down, but the anger and frustration was never going to stay hidden and it was obvious to the audience that this engagement was doomed.

Both of our lead actors, Dynevor and Ehrenreich did a spectacular job playing the emotions that they were burying inside of them. As communication broke down, mistrust started filling the emptiness.

This is not a movie I would throw on to have a pick me up. It is most definitely a downer of a story, but it is extremely well told and acted. It is one of those movies that I would admire, but never want to see again.

3.5 stars

It Lives Inside

I missed this horror movie when it was in the theaters, and I have not rented it on Vudu while the price was high. I found out that this movie, It Lives Inside, had dropped the price on Vudu down to a more realistic amount and so I rented it this weekend. I am certainly glad that I did not spend 19.99 to rent this one.

I found this movie to be pretty boring for much of the runtime. The third act wasn’t too bad, but, in my mind, this movie could have been more scary had they spent less time showing us this monster.

According to IMDB, “Sam (Megan Suri), an Indian-American teen, lives in an idyllic suburb with her conservative mother (Neeru Bajwa) and her assimilated father (Vik Sahay). Sam’s cultural insecurities grow due to her estranged friend, Tamira (Mohana Krishnan), who mysteriously carries around an empty mason jar all the time. In a moment of anger, Sam breaks Tamira’s jar and unleashes an ancient Indian demonic force that kidnaps Tamira. Sam searches for Tamira, following the trail of a young man who performed a deadly ritual, until the demonic entity starts targeting her, murdering her boyfriend and shattering her reality with terrifying visions. Sam must band together with her parents and a sympathetic teacher (Betty Gabriel) to save Tamira and put an end to the terror of the demon.

Megan Suri does a good job as the lead protagonist. She is an interesting actor and does not seem that she fits as the lead.

I like the idea that the monster was more specific to the culture of Indian-America, but much of the story was fairly typical. Nothing about this stands out in the horror genre.

It Lives Inside is not the worst movie of the year by far, but it is not a great one either. I’m glad I waited to see it.

2.3 stars

Five Nights at Freddy’s

The brand new video game adaptation was released this week. It is called Five Nights at Freddy’s. I originally was planning to go to the theater to see this, but I discovered that it is also streaming day and date on Peacock so I decided to save myself some gas, make it a weekend lounging at home, and watch it on the streaming service.

I’m glad I did not drive down to the Quad Cities to watch this because it was not that enjoyable.

I have no background with the video game, but, for me, there was a better version of this released a few years ago starring Nicolas Cage that was called Willy’s Wonderland. It is not a literal adaptation, but the idea is very close.

Five Night’s at Freddy’s starred Josh Hutcherson (from Hunger Games fame) as Mike, a troubled man struggling to overcome a haunting memory from his youth and take care of his little sister Abby (Piper Rubio). As part of a way to move forward, Mike is hired by Steve raglan (Matthew Lillard) as a security guard for a closed down restaurant that had been popular in the 1980s. His job, just keep people out.

Desperate to discover the truth of his younger brother, Mike found that the animatronics from the restaurant where more than what they seemed.

Overall, the story in this movie was messy, did not have enough moments that paid off for what it as asking us to watch and included a bizarre ending that felt out of place.

Hutcherson’s character did not give us the required emotional depth for us to really connect to him. I never believed in this character’s arc and found him to be disposable. Hutcherson did not elevate this role with his performance.

The movie featured a lot of dull moments with the monstrous animatronics really being regulated in the film. There were a few fun horror moments, but nowhere near as creative or enjoyable as it should have been.

The film added a character named Vanessa (Elizabeth Lail) who was absolutely terrible and the film utterly wasted Mary Stuart Masterson in a throwaway ‘evil aunt’ character that was completely unnecessary and one-dimensional.

I have seen comments on how this could be used to introduce kids to horror. To that I would say that there are considerably smarter movies and TV shows that would do that better than this.

I was disappointed at Five Night’s at Freddy’s as I hoped that this would be more than what it was. Watch Willy’s Wonderland instead.

2.4 stars

Apostle (2018)

The October 13 of 13

So The October 13, the watch of thirteen horror/Halloween/thriller movies that I had not written a review for on the site, comes to an end with the final listed film, the Netflix film called Apostle starring Dan Stevens.

According to IMDB, “The year is 1905. Thomas Richardson (Dan Stevens) travels to a remote island to rescue his sister after she’s kidnapped by a mysterious religious cult demanding a ransom for her safe return. It soon becomes clear that the cult will regret the day it baited this man, as he digs deeper and deeper into the secrets and lies upon which the commune is built

The first feeling, vibe, I got from this film was that it reminded me of The Wicker Man. This turned even more brutal and certainly avoided the hammy clichés of the Nicolas Cage’s movie.

This started really slow. In fact, almost an hour in, I was not finding much to enjoy in Apostle. Dan Stevens is always solid and his performance was basically what was keeping me with the film.

When things picked up, there was some horrific scenes involving a father and his daughter that were shocking and disturbing. It was at this point that I found myself more invested than I had been at any point prior to this.

The third act of this film was brutal and bloody, with some horrific imagery that pushed the story into a new level. However, I am not sure that I enjoyed the resolution of this film.

This wrapped up The October 13 with a bit of a downer. Apostle had some ups, but I’m not sure there are enough ups to recommend it.

Totally Killer

“Time travel! … What? I see this as an absolute win.” – Bruce Banner, Avengers: Endgame.

Time travel movies are crazy. And they all have rules that change. Back to the Future. Avengers Endgame. LOST. 12 Monkeys. Dozens more.

You can add another time travel movie to the list with the film Totally Killer, which is available on Prime. And it is a total hoot.

This was a really fun and inventive movie with a lot of humor and creativity. Does the time travel rules get broken? Oh yeah. Are there a few weird plot points that do not make sense? Sure. Did they leave a dangling plot or two? Yes. But I had an absolute blast watching it and was totally engaged all the way through.

According to IMDB, “When the infamous ‘Sweet Sixteen Killer’ returns 35 years after his first murder spree to claim another victim, 17-year-old Jamie (Kiernan Shipka) accidentally travels back in time to 1987, determined to stop the killer before he can start.

Kiernan Shipka was great as out protagonist who was desperately running around in the past trying to use the information that she knew in order to prevent the three killings and to change the future that she left.

The film wisely alluded to several of the time travel movies, comparing what was going on to the situation they were in. Every time Jamie made an allusion to a movie, she was like the audience, who must have been thinking the same thing.

The final showdown with the killer was not the best moment of the film, but it did not detract from the overall enjoyment of the film. I have said this before, but when a film is funny, it gets extra grace when dealing with storyline. This movie was funny.

Some of the best jokes were about the 1980s and how people kept doing things that she thought, in her 2023 mindset, was just crazy or dangerous. There was a scene with the red rubber dodgeballs that I literally screamed out about. Our generation knew what it was like to be hit in the face with those red dodgeballs and get past it. That does not happen in today’s schools.

This film knows that it is silly and slight, and it plays into it big time. By doing so, they have given us a spectacularly good time in a film that is like Back to the Future combined with Scream combined with Happy Death Day. I loved this.

4.5 stars

Jennifer’s Body (2009)

The October 12 of 13

The penultimate film in the October 13th watch was a horror/comedy called Jennifer’s Body, which featured performances from Megan Fox and Amanda Seyfried.

This one was up and down for me. There were things that I thought were clever and enjoyable, but there were other aspects of the film that I found disappointing and dumb.

I really liked the relationship between Seyfried’s Needy and her boyfriend Chip (Johnny Simmons). I thought that relationship defied the typical relationship you would see in a teen film and I thought they had a rooting interest. I was very unhappy with the resolution of this coupling.

Megan Fox was actually pretty good in this role, even if a lot of it was dumb. Fox as a demon-possessed creature oddly fit.

Unlike some of the other films I have seen lately, this one’s conclusion was much better and provided some satisfaction after much of the disappointment of the story up until this point.

The film was lacking any real funny moments as I may have laughed once. The scares were almost minimal as it just depended on having some blood on Megan Fox or having her make scary faces when she attacked her victims.

The parents and teachers (especially the terrible wigged up version of JK Simmons) were so lost and were lacking in this story at all. Everything was so unbelievable that when the parts that were supposed to be normal is difficult to believe, the fantastical isn’t going to work either.

This is not the worst movie I have watched during the October 13, but it is down the list for sure.

Saw (2004)

The October 11 of 13

I have never had any interest in the Saw franchise. The torture/gore films do not appeal to me and I have always connected the Saw franchise to that form of movie.

However, I decided that this movie watch, The October 13, I would give the original Saw a try. I had heard that this was the best of the franchise and did not resemble the gore fests of the sequels that followed it. So I added it to the list.

Who would have thought… I liked this a lot.

For me, the film benefited from its cast because it featured Cary Elwes, whom I loved from The Princess Bride, Danny Glover (whose inclusion surprised me), and two of my favorites from LOST, Ken Leung (who played Miles) and Ben Linus himself, Michael Emerson.

The film also did not include nearly as much gore and torture scenes as I expected. It was there, but it was more psychological torture than anything else. It felt like the graphic scenes all were earned and not just tossed in for a gross-out quota.

Unfortunately, I knew the answer to the twist of the film because I had seen the previews for Saw X which was out this year (and I have not seen) and I knew the actor who was behind Jigsaw. I wished I had not known that because it did affect my viewing of this.

Some of the storytelling aspects of the film was confusing, especially the flashback sequences which kept the narrative from being told in a typical structure. While that is usually a cool feature, this caused more confusion as I was not sure when the events were taking place and in what order we were supposed to put them in. Still, I give director James Wan credit for trying to frame the story in a different manner than other slasher films.

I did not like the ending scene of the film as it felt tacked on or unsatisfying. I found that it really stretched credibility of the film that already required a lot of stretching. Plus, I did not like the way they left everything up in the air and how we really do not know the fate of some of the characters involved.

In the end, I was impressed overall with Saw and I am pleased that I watched it. It was a much better film than I thought it was going to be. However, I do not plan on watching any of the other, universally panned sequels that followed this.

The Amityville Horror (1979)

The October 10 of 13

How is a film that is so well-known and iconic this bad?

The Amityville Horror was made in 1979 based on a “true” story. It is one of the most famous haunted house movies of all time. Yet, this was not a good movie.

It was so silly at many times that it undercut whatever tension and anxiety it tried to build into the mood.

I would give credit to James Brolin and Margot Kidder, who played George and Kathy Lutz- the newly married couple who moved into the house where a brutal murder of a family took place. Brolin and Kidder did what they could and they certainly committed to the story. They were not the problem and they may be the reason why this stinker has passed the test of time.

Of course, Brolin’s axe into the bathroom door came a year before Jack Nicholson’s far superior axe job in The Shining. Brolin snapped out of his trans fairly quickly so maybe Jack needs to take some notes from him.

The same could not be said for Rod Steiger, whose performance as Father Delaney was so far beyond over-the-top that his entire screaming monologues become laughable.

The ending was both sudden and ridiculous. George Lutz was a much better person than I am because I would be going dog shopping for a new dog instead of running back into that insanity. And why did he fall into that huge pool of blood? Where did that come from?

It felt as if the film had a bunch of subplots that never really came together in the movie.

It may be iconic, but that does not make it something you should watch again. Bad movie.

Killers of the Flower Moon

The newest epic film from Martin Scorsese was widely released this weekend, based on a true story. The film is entitled Killers of the Flower Moon and it is set just after World War I in Oklahoma and featured the Osage nation.

The Indians of the Osage nation discovered that there was oil beneath their land and they became incredibly wealthy. However, this led to a series of deaths and murders of the Osage people in an attempt to get the land and oil money away from them.

Ernest Burkhart (Leonardo DiCaprio) returned from the war to go work for his uncle, William “King” Hale (Robert DeNiro). He met up with one of the Osage Indians from the family that owned the land, Mollie (Lily Gladstone), fell for her and married her. There was some inkling early in the film that perhaps he had married her for the oil.

As their life together progressed, other members of her family started dying off in suspicious manners. It became clear that Hale had been calling the shots and had been using Ernest to do his dirty work along with several other men.

I will say that I thought this film was good. I was not as blown away by it as I thought I might be. There are a lot of strong parts of the movie that just have enough problems to keep it from being a masterful film.

One issue is that the film does feel its length at times. Killers of the Flower Moon is nearly three and a half hours long, which is a marathon of a film and it is not brimmed full with action or dramatic moments. It is definitely a slow burn. Even though I think the film works as a slow burn, I do think they could have condensed some of the scenes in the middle to trim off 10-15 minutes and it would be for the film’s benefit.

Another major issue I had is a spoiler so I will have to just touch on it generally. It feels like something that is a creative swing that may work for some people, but that will be a problem for other. I fall into the latter category. This is the conclusion or the wrap up of the story. The way they wrapped up the movie did not work for me at all and I even think it damaged the narrative that had been constructed.

Positives of the film included some excellent acting. Standout performances came from Lily Gladstone, Leonardo DiCaprio and Robert DeNiro. Lily Gladstone has been called the heart of the picture, and I can see why. She does an amazing job as Mollie, a woman suffering form the pain of losing family members while dealing with her own health issues. You could feel for her constantly as she tried to take strength from her marriage, despite her husband being a conflicted a-hole.

That a-hole was Leonardo DiCaprio, who does a really great job playing this conflicted and manipulated man. Truly, I found my own opinions on Ernest to be filled with hatred as he continued to make poor choices in betrayal of his wife and her family all for the money.

This was the best performance of Robert DeNiro has given in years. His portrayal of William Hale is creepy and full of sinister behavior as he manipulates everyone to do what he wants them to do.

The technical aspects of Killers of the Flower Moon was exceptional. The film looked great and the directorial job from Scorsese is awesome.

This movie is good, but not great. Th length can be an issue, but it is a interesting story with some top notch performances.

3.5 stars

Slither (2006)

The October 9 of 13

The October 13 continues this month with James Gunn’s horror/comedy/sci-fi film called Slither. This is a monster from outer space type film that had some zombie movie tropes to it.

Gunn’s favorite actors make appearances in this flick, including Michael Rooker and Nathan Fillion. Elizabeth Banks is another of Gunn’s regulars. All of these actors are front and center in major roles in this movie.

According to IMDB, “From the depths of the endless space, a flaming meteorite crashes into the dark woods of the sleepy town of Wheelsy, South Carolina. As the scorched rock reveals its silent content–a baneful parasitic organism–a subtle alien invasion commences, and the war’s unlucky first victim is the town’s local businessman, Grant (Michael Rooker). Little by little, as an internal change transforms Grant into an utterly hideous monstrosity, his wife, Starla (Elizabeth Banks), starts to feel that something’s been eating at him the last few days. Now, before the unstoppable extraterrestrial attack, no one is safe, and to make matters worse, Grant’s transformation is far from over yet. Who can stop the slithering army from outer space?”

Nathan Fillion was great as the local sheriff. I loved the writing for Fillion, his dry wit was so apparent and a perfect fit for the story. He was excellent in this role.

This was tense, and it was very creepy, with those slithery red worms going into people’s mouths and turning them into monsters.

Slither had a definite Men in Black feel to it with just more gross-out moments. It was funny with some real laugh out loud bits. Gregg Henry was a hoot in his obnoxious mayor role.

Slither was great. I had thought that I had seen this before, but as I was watching it, nothing seemed familiar. I enjoyed it tremendously.

From Hell (2001)

The October 8 of 13

From Hell was a detective/horror film starring Johnny Depp adapted from a classic graphic novel by Alan Moore.

The story of From Hell centers around the notorious Jack the Ripper killings that plagued Whitechapel in London,England in 1888. Five prostitutes were brutally murdered and butchered by a mysterious figure in the alleys of Whitechapel, which led to rampant speculation about the truth behind the killings. Countless theories have come forth about the real identity of the murderer. This film looks at one of the more controversial and conspiratorial theories of whom Jack the Ripper was.

I won’t go into specifics on this theory, but it is clearly fictionalized by Moore. The film does a good job of using the facts of the cases and fitting it all into the narrative it espouses.

Johnny Depp played Inspector Frederick Abberline, the detective assigned the Ripper case. Heather Graham played Mary Kelly, the fifth victim of the Ripper. Other actors in the film include Ian Holm, Robbie Coltrane, Ian Richardson, Jason Flemyng, and Samantha Spiro.

The film is very atmospheric and looks excellent. The period piece is moody and has a perfect tone for the time frame.

Depp gives a top notch performance in the role as the drug-addicted detective. They matched him up with Heather Graham’s character. I’m not sure that worked fully as the film seemed to push them together too quickly. Still, I did like each individual performance.

The story was complicated, but does work out at the end and does give a modicum of finality which is truly lacking in any real story involving Jack the Ripper.

I have always been a fan of the tale of the mysterious serial killer, having read several books on different theories so From Hell is right up my alley. It is currently available on Max.

Taylor Swift: The Eras Tour

I was not sure if I was going to go to the Taylor Swift: The Eras Tour so I asked my NEST/home room class if I should go. I told them that I did not know much about Taylor Swift but that I would be interested in reviewing the film for the EYG site. They told me that I should go…so I bought my ticket.

As I said, I know very little about Taylor Swift. Honestly, outside of Shake it Off, I could not name another Swift song. I did recognize the tune of the one song that Weird Al had parodied into the song “TMZ.”

I am going to be honest, a lot of these songs felt the same to me. I do think that most of that is because I do not know the songs. I did like the transitions between songs because many times, they just moved into a different song and you could tell the change.

Hearing some of these other songs, I realized that Taylor Swift was a real storyteller with her lyrics. There were some surprisingly deep words in these lyrics. I was actually impressed. However, I counted at least three F-Bombs and I wondered as I was watching the movie what the rating was, since usually one F-Bomb is allowed for PG-13.

The stage set up for this concert tour was spectacular. The LED screens and the stage craft was wonderful and some of the most creative ideas in execution. The moment Taylor Shift dove into the stage and started ‘swimming’ in the water beneath was a stunning achievement.

I also loved the back-up dancers, especially the black, heavier set man dancer. I was so impressed with him and the fact that they gave him a primary spot among the dancers. You normally do not see a man with this type of body style as a back-up dancer. However, I could not take my eyes of this gentleman when he was front and center. He was impressive.

I enjoyed the experience of watching this too. There was some singing in my theater and some waving arms etc. I would have liked more of that from the crowd I was with. I had expected more of that and I was looking forward to the energy that the audience was going to bring. I saw this in XD theater and the sound was amazing… rocking loud.

I had a real good time with this concert movie even with a performer that I did not know much about. Her music was entertaining and the shots of the concert by director Sam Wrench were excellent. If you are a fan of Taylor Swift, this will be an amazing experience. If you are not, give it a chance because you may become one afterwards.

4.2 stars

The Ring (2002)

The October 7 of 13

As I continued the October 13, this morning I went over to Prime and watched The Ring, an iconic horror movie from 2002.

There is a videotape filled with nightmarish imagery that, if you watch, seven days later, you die. Newspaper reporter Rachel Keller (Naomi Watts) started looking into the story after the death of a family member (Amber Tamblyn) and she discovered the dangers firsthand.

There are some plot holes in The Ring, but the atmosphere and mood of the film is outstandingly creepy and work to build tension as Naomi Watts desperately tried to find an answer to the mystery before the clock runs out on her. The film does a great job of being unnerving without being gory or exploitative.

Naomi Watts is the standout of the entire film. Her performance anchors the story together, raises her character which did not have too much depth, and keeps the attention on her. A less skilled actress could have fallen into the flaws of the story and drag the film down too. Watts, on the other hand, brought the perfect amount of gravitas to the film and gave everyone someone to root for.

The film does a solid job of creating an air of eeriness and keeps the audience on the edge. You are never quite sure what was happening and the film embraces that.

The back story of the videotape (as it were) was horrifying and painful. Your perceptions switch as the film moves along, which keeps the film off-balance.

The Ring was very successful. It was based on the Japanese movie Ring by Hideo Nakata from 1998.

Monster House (2006)

The October 6 of 13

Monster House is a computer animated film from Relativity Media, their first animated film. This has become one of the October 13 here at EYG.

The house across the street from DJ (Mithell Musso) is alive. DJ has been watching the house because of the antics of the crabby old man Mr. Horace Nebbercracker (Steve Buscemi) who would confiscate toys of kids that windup on his front lawn.

When Nebbercracker seemingly died when confronting DJ, the house became more dangerous…especially since it is almost Halloween.

There is a ton of creativity in this movie. The animation and character design is excellent and a lot of fun. The third act conflict worked big time in this film, which I think helped a slightly underwhelming second act.

The voice actors, along with Steve Buscemi is strong. They include Sam Lerner, Spencer Locke, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Kevin James, Nick Cannon, Jason Lee, Jon Heder, Catherine O’Hara, Fred Willard, and Kathleen Turner.

I will say that I was not a huge fan of a couple of the characters, especially Chowder, Zee and Skull. Still, I did like DJ and Jenny and the whole use of Nebbercracker was clever.

This was a solid Halloween animated film. The design of the house, in particular, was remarkably creative and imaginative.

Monster Inside: America’s Most Extreme Haunted House

I am not sure what some people are thinking.

This documentary tells the tale of Russ McKamey and the McKamey Immersive Horror Haunted house, a place where the former US Navy veteran ‘hosts’ people who come to his house and he puts them through torturous situations.

The doc used only real footage, footage that was filmed during these events at the house and it was shocking what people would allow him to do to them. Waterboarding, burying them alive, or exploiting the guest’s deepest fears.

I was shocked at how many people appeared on the doc to support or defend Russ. There were several people who had signed up for the immersive house only to realize how wild and horrific and sadistic the situations would become.

I could have used more specifics or background on Russ McKamey, who appears in the videos as well, because it would be good to know more about him and his choices.

I wanted more from the doc, but the story it did tell was unbelievable.

3.1 stars