Dark Places (2015)

DailyView: Day 116, Movie 189

This is the last day of the Showtime channel that I got real cheap on Prime Day a couple of months ago and I figured that watching one more movie on the channel would be a good choice. Going through the list, I found the 2015 film starring Charlize Theron called Dark Places.

Libby Day (Charlize Theron) was the sole survivor of a massacre at her family’s home when she was 8 years old. Her testimony helped to convict her brother Ben (played as a youth by Tye Sheridan and later as an adult by Corey Stoll) for the murder.

Years later, Libby was approached by Lyle Wirth (Nicholas Hoult), a member of a club that investigates true crime cases, who believed Ben was innocent of the murders and wanted Libby to help them prove it. Of course, this opened several old wounds for Libby as she recounted the night her mother (Christina Hendricks) and two sisters died.

This one was a mixed bag of a movie. There were several bits that I really liked, and several bits that bother me. Starting with what I liked, Charlize Theron is great. I believed her as a traumatized adult who had gone through hell as a child and just wanted to be left alone. She had capitalized on the infamy of the case, which did not make her look like a good person, but she was clearly still being tortured by the memories of that night. Sterling Jerins, who played young Libby, was just a solid in the flashback scenes of Libby’s childhood.

I enjoyed the mystery of what exactly happened on the night in question, as Ben’s guilt had been questioned by Lyle and his Kill Club and their obsession with the case (however, the one woman in the club, Magda, played by Lori Cordova was a horribly cruel person and I did not like her immediately). Again, Theron is excellent here as she is just never quite sure what she remembered from that night.

Chloe Grace Moretz played Ben’s girlfriend in the flashbacks and she is a bit of a contradiction. I’m not sure how I am expected to feel about this character. Moretz is always a solid actor and she does a good job here too. I just wish her character was better written.

However, the way the movie revealed the story was very odd. It jumped around from point of view throughout the plot, sometimes showing us memories from Libby, sometimes showing us times when Libby was nowhere to be seen. Libby did a voice over during some of it, but they revealed scenes of flashbacks that Libby could not have known. The POV was so confused and inconsistent that it really messed with the story, which could have been told in a much more useful manner.

This movie was based on Gillian Flynn’s 2009 novel of the same name and it feels as if some of the important details were left out. At times the movie felt rushed, and could have allowed more time for scenes to breathe.

Overall, I enjoyed the story and the performances more than I disliked the structure of the filmmaking. I had seen the low Rotten Tomatoes score on this before I had started it (23%) so my expectations were low, which always seems to help when watching a movie. This was passable for me.

Dirty Dancing (1987)

DailyView: Day 115, Movie 188

“Nobody puts Baby in a corner.”

One of the most iconic quotes from any movie, it is from the classic dance movie of the 1980s, Dirty Dancing.

In the Catskills, “Baby” Houseman (Jennifer Grey) spends the summer at a resort with her family. This year, she winds up taking the place of one of the dancers in a performance with dance instructor Johnny Castle (Patrick Swayze). Through their dancing, Baby and Johnny fall in love.

Another film that I never was interested in seeing. The rom com type dance flick never appealed to me. Yet, after watching it today for the first time, it was a decent watch. I liked the simplistic story, the development of the relationship between Johnny and Baby.

Both Swayze and Grey do a great job with the dance routines and the practice sessions, which is as fun as the finished product. The practice scenes with them in the outdoors were so much fun. The dancing on the fallen tree was impressive.

There are some excellent actors in supporting roles too, led by the late Jerry Orbach. The film also includes Cynthia Rhodes, Jack Weston, Jane Brucker, Wayne Knight, and Kelly Bishop.

Dirty Dancing is a fun movie with some great music and dance routines.

Paw Patrol: The Movie

Tomorrow is my final day of a subscription to Paramount + that I got at an extremely low cost during Prime Day. I have not used the Paramount + subscription for as much as some of the other ones, but it has given me an opportunity to see a movie that I probably wouldn’t have seen in the theater. It is the first feature length film from the animated series Paw Patrol. Paw Patrol: The Movie is day and date release in theaters and on streaming and I’ve heard positive word of mouth on the film.

Ryder (Will Brisbin) and his Paw Patrol get a call for help from Adventure City because newly elected Mayor Humdinger (Ron Pardo) was causing chaos. However, returning to Adventure City caused a crisis of memory for team member Chase (Iain Armitage), the big city where he was dumped as a puppy.

Now, I am not the target audience for this movie. It is certainly targeted at a younger aged child. However, there have been movies that I said that same thing, but I gave negative reviews for because they were so dumb or poorly executed. Just because something is meant for children doesn’t give it a right to be bad.

After seeing the Paw Patrol movie, I can say that this is a good film for a family to spend watching together. It has a cute, simple story, with appealing characters, some quality animation, and several positive messages on teamwork, overcoming personal challenges, dedication and heroism.

The voice cast is solid. It includes Will Brisbin, Iain Armitage, Ron Pardo, Tyler Perry, Jimmy Kimmel, Randall Park, Kingsley Marshall, Keegan Hedley, Marsai Martin, Shayle Simons, Callum Shoniker, Lilly Bartlam, Dax Shepard and Kim Roberts.

Paw Patrol: The Movie is a film that the kids should love and one that the parents won’t hate having to sit through.

3.5 stars

Reminiscence

Reminiscence is the new science fiction, neo-noir starring Hugh Jackman and Rebecca Ferguson. It is directed by Lisa Joy, a producer and writer from the HBO TV show Westworld.

In a dystopian futuristic world, Nick Bannister (Hugh Jackman), a private investigator of the mind who uses the reminiscence to search for information through the memories of his clients. When a simple case of missing keys from a woman named Mae (Rebecca Ferguson) came into his office, Nick found that it was anything but simple. He fell for Mae and he became obsessed with her when she disappeared.

There are some good parts of the film, but, unfortunately, it is mixed in with a lot of negative. Starting off with the fact that I never bought the connection between Nick and Mae. Jackman and Ferguson are tremendous actors, but this story just did not provide them with the sufficient details to make me care about them together. Their chemistry was lacking. I do not think that is because of the acting, but because of the story.

The premise was pretty interesting, but it does feel like movies that we have already seen. There feels to be a lot of convoluted plot points that happen that are not needed. The run time is almost 2 hours and I feel every bit of the time.

There is a lot of stuff, characters in particular, that is thrown at the audience and they are not effectively explained, which makes their eventual importance less important for me. The only people who I had a real knowledge of was Nick and Mae, and not necessarily Mae. Thandiwe Newton played Nick’s partner in his reminiscence business and I did like her, but she felt underdeveloped and not used enough. She did have one bad ass fight scene with Nick, but she was someone I could have used more from. Cliff Curtis was a crooked cop at the heart of the convoluted plot that I really did not know much about and so when he was such a vital aspect of the ending, I was not as invested as I could have been.

I watched this on HBO Max this morning and I was glad that I did not have to go to the theater to see it. It is a film that feels as if it has wasted a solid cast and a potentially interesting premise for a mismanaged love story.

2.4 stars

Flipper (1963)

DailyView: Day 114, Movie 187

Today, the DailyView heads out to sea for a boy and his dolphin. It is the iconic tale of the dolphin that they call Flipper.

They call him Flipper, Flipper, faster than lightning,
No-one you see, is smarter than he,
And we know Flipper, lives in a world full of wonder,
Flying there-under, under the sea!

source: https://www.lyricsondemand.com/tvthemes/flipperlyrics.html

The young boy Sandy (Luke Halpin), son of fisherman Porter Ricks (Chuck Connors), rescued a dolphin who had been injured by a spear, and nursed the animal back to health. When Sandy’s father discovered his son’s actions, he made Sandy release Flipper back to the sea. However, Flipper was not going to be out of their lives.

There are some neat tricks from Flipper and Luke Halpin, but, honestly, there is a lot of repeated images of the dolphin’s tricks. There are a plenty of reused scenes between the dialogue. That is not necessarily a bad thing, but it is obvious when it is happening.

Luke Halpin is fine in the film. He is not asked to go into depth with his performances, but what he does here is what the film needs and asks of him. Chuck Connors is the biggest star of the cast and he is the person who learns the biggest lesson. He and his son do have a solid relationship and they show it well.

This movie is not a fantastic movie, but it was fine. It was an entertaining

O Brother, Where Art Thou? (2000)

DailyView: Day 113, Movie 186

We are heading back to the world of the Coen Brothers with one of their best films, the satire O Brother, Where Art Thou? starring George Clooney, John Turturro and Tim Blake Nelson.

This was a fun, laugh out loud film that took some great comedic performances from its three main characters and turned it into a fully engaging and entertaining movie.

Everett (George Clooney), Pete (John Turturro) and Delmar (Tim Blake Nelson) were together on a chain gang, attached by a chain, when they were able to make their escape. Everett told the others about a grand treasure that he had buried and he offered to split it with them for their help. Pete and Delmar were not the brightest bulb around so they went along, traipsing through the South where they found themselves in all manner of troubles.

The film is a satire on Homer’s Odyssey, and the trials of Odysseus in an attempt to find his way home. In the Odyssey, Homer writes about all of the distractions Odysseus had to face and overcome to continue the journey. Whereas Odysseus had to face the dangers of the Ancient Greece world, Everett, Delmar and Pete had to confront such distractions as a obsessed lawman (Daniel von Bargen), Tommy (Chris Thomas King) who was a black guitar player who claimed to have sold his soul to the devil, the Ku Klux Klan, a fairly crooked gubernatorial political race between Gov. Pappy O’Daniel (Charles Durning) and his challenger Homer Stokes (Wayne Duvall), a group of singing women ‘sirens’, and more.

Each of these trips take time away from the ultimate goal, which may not be exactly what Everett had claimed.

The music of the film is fantastic. Not only do the three escaped fugitives belt out some great music (as the Soggy Bottom Boys), it seemed as if every time they found themselves off target, it was connected to the music. There are some wonderful folk songs played throughout the film, and the music does a great job of punctuating each scene that it is used with.

There was such a clever screenplay behind this movie and the music complimented everything the film was trying to do. Then with three amazing performances from Clooney, Turturro and Nelson, this is one of my favorite Coen Brothers movies, right up there with Fargo and The Big Lebowski. Entertaining film.

The Adventures of Sharkboy and Lavagirl (2005)

DailyView: Day 112, Day 185

Trying to squeeze a movie in today, which has been a very busy one. I went to HBO Max and found The Adventures of Sharkboy and Lavagirl from director Robert Rodriguez. I had watched We Can Be Heroes on Netflix and I enjoyed it. It was about the children of the super heroes coming together to face an intergalactic threat. With that enjoyable film, the film that proceeded it had to be good, didn’t it?

Nope.

The Adventures of Sharkboy and Lavagirl is a terrible movie. The acting is below average. The special effects are cartoonish. The dialogue is laughable. Nothing makes sense.

A bullied young boy named Max (Cayden Boyd) dreams up a pair of super heroes, Sharkboy (Tayler Lautner) and Lavagirl (Taylor Dooley). They come to get Max to help save their planet, the Planet Drool.

This was shot in 3D, though I did not watch it that way. You could see where they intended the 3D to be. And it was distracting.

A lot of bad with this one.

The Idle Class (1921)

DailyView: Day 111, Day 184

Woke up early today to take care of the DailyView since the rest of the day feels very packed. That meant that I had to return to the world of The Little Tramp, aka Charlie Chaplin.

This time, the Little Tramp starred in The Idle Class. Chaplin sneaks into an upper class golf resort. He meets a woman who is having an argument with her drunken husband who, just so happens, to resemble the Tramp. The woman mistakes Chaplin for her husband and hilarity ensues.

Much like the other silent films from the oeuvre of Charlie Chaplin, the key component is the slapstick comedy and, once again, Charlie Chaplin proves to be brilliant at it. The sequence on the golf course in this movie is genius.

Chaplin does play dual roles in The Idle Class, which is something that he will do several times in his career. There is a clever use of a suit of armor to help when the two roles are on screen at the same time.

Something that is not mentioned enough is the wonderful score that accompanies the film. This score is composed by Chaplin himself, showing off the talent that he has. The comedy is always enhanced by the music playing behind it and that helps the movie flow well.

The Chaplin train continues as it once again helps out the DailyView.

The Raven (1935)

DailyView: Day 110, Movie 183

School has started (well, professional development for staff has started), but it is still technically summer, so I am continuing the DailyView. I have not yet determined exactly how long I will maintain the DailyView. It will determine how busy I get with school.

However, today was a busy day and I am very tired from the work, so I pulled out The Raven, a movie just over one hour in length that fits nicely into my time schedule. The Raven from 1935 was based loosely on Edgar Allan Poe’s classic poem of the same name. When I say loosely, I mean loosely. It featured two of the iconic horror icons of the time, Bela Legosi and Boris Karloff.

Bela Legosi played a retired surgeon Dr. Richard Vollin who had an obsession with all things Poe. So much so that he built several torture devices in his basement. Vollin is begged to come out of retirement to save the life of the injured Jean Thatcher (Irene Ware). He does so and Vollin falls for the woman.

Setting up a plot, Vollin brings in wanted criminal Edmond Bateman (Boris Karloff). He turned Bateman into a hideous monster and sent him to capture and torture Jean’s fiancé (Lester Matthews).

There is very little in this movie that connects to the poem at all. They mention the poem a few times, Legosi pictures Jean as his “Lenore” but after that, there is nothing else that ties them together. In fact, the main torture device is from the Poe short story, The Pit and the Pendulum.

Bela Legosi is way over-the-top with his performance as the mad doctor. He seemed to be Count Dracula but obsessed with torture and Edgar Allan Poe. So much of what Vollin does make little sense and he truly becomes little more than a mustache-twirling villain. You can see what is going to happen miles off.

This is one of those movies that could be a lot of fun with the Rifftrax guys riffing it. It is corny and silly.

Respect

A new biopic came out this weekend telling the story of EYG Hall of Famer Aretha Franklin, from her early days of singing in her father’s church to the recording of her best selling gospel album and documentary that went with it.

Jennifer Hudson has one of the few voices able to pull off the songs of The Queen of Soul. The remainder of the cast all do an admirable job in the biopic.

I am mixed on this movie. There were some sections of this film that I really did not like while other parts that were just tremendous. Anything dealing with the music/songs, including how they were being constructed and recorded was fire. Jennifer Hudson is remarkable and the way the film outlines the way the songs were being put together is fascinating and, at times, thrilling.

The first act of the film felt like it was a bad Lifetime movie. Forest Whitaker played Aretha’s father, C.L. Franklin. The first part of the movie rushed through what seemed like significant moments in Aretha’s life and set up several important bits that is never quite ever paid off. Again, any of the music really helped save the first half of this movie, keeping it from completely falling apart.

The third act of the movie also seemed to be too packed. It feels as if the movie tried to cover too much of Aretha’s life and that it might have benefitted from picking one time to focus in on. However, the third act was stronger than the beginning, and that was mainly because of a really great performance from Jennifer Hudson. This was the moment where Aretha finally stood up and started being the Queen.

Then the emotional “Amazing Grace” cover during the recording of Aretha’s gospel album was stunning and a powerful way to end the film.

The film did feel long, but there is supposed to have been a 3-hour cut of the movie that had been shown last year and it already cut out 45 minutes of the film. That might be the reason why I felt as if there were some things missing.

Overall, I think that the film is more good than bad. The music is unbelievable and worth the time alone. I just wish the rest of the film matched the intensity of the music.

3.1 stars

Easy Rider (1969)

DailyView: Day 109, Movie 182

With the inclusion of the movie, Easy Rider, I have had at least one movie during the DailyView from 2020 back to 1964, as Easy Rider’s year of 1969 was missing.

Easy Rider is considered a classic, a symbol of the 1960s. Unfortunately, I found most of the movie to be pretty boring and aimless. However, the end of the film is a shocking moment that helps bring much of the film together.

Wyatt (Peter Fonda) and Billy (Dennis Hopper), two hippie bikers from, LA who, after a drug deal, decided to head south to New Orleans for Mardi Gras. Their time traveling the land of America dealing with the counterculture and the prejudice of the time followed them the whole way.

Fonda and Hopper gave good performances, apparently making much of the trip up on the spot. I think that is part of what made the film feel so erratic.

My favorite part of the film were two main things. One, the use of the amazing soundtrack with their impressive travel scenes. The countryside was beautifully shot and the music worked perfectly. The second part was the arrival and performance of Jack Nicholson as lawyer George Hanson, who joined with Wyatt and Billy on their journey for part of their trip. Nicholson was amazing as the man searching for the freedom that Wyatt and Billy were enjoying.

Then there was the ending. The third act had some bizarreness to it that was pulling the movie down for me even more. However the final shot of the film was unexpected and doubled down on the theme of prejudice that had been shown across the movie. It was a strong and shocking conclusion to a movie that I had not enjoyed that much.

A strong ending can help a movie, but in this case, there is too much wandering for my tastes. Easy Rider lacks some essential points that are important for me and so the movie is a passable one at best.

The Defiant Ones (1958)

DailyView: Day 108, Movie 181

Today’s DailyView heads back into the 1950s in a black and white movie dealing with black and white racial issues with the Oscar winning movie, The Defiant Ones.

In The Defiant Ones, two criminals, John “Joker” Jackson (Tony Curtis),a white man, and Noah Cullen (Sidney Poitier), a black man, who were on a chain gang and chained together by their arms, escaped when the truck that was transporting them crashed. As they started their flight, the two men hated each other, but as they struggled to survive, they gained a mutual respect.

The dialogue is some of the best in The Defiant Ones. It does a great job of showing these two men and their developing friendship across the racial divide.

One of the best characters in the film is the kind sheriff who was pursuing the runaways, Sheriff Max Muller (Theodore Bikel) who doggedly chased them, insisting on doing things the right way.

However, the movie depends on the the two lead actors to carry the load and Tony Curtis and Sidney Poitier come through big time. Both men received well deserved Oscar nominations as Lead Actor for this performance. Poitier became the first African-American actor to be nominated in the Lead Actor category.

A simple premise leads to a deeper story. A classic movie with big time performances.

Friday the 13th (1980)

DailyView: Day 107, Movie 180

Since today is Friday the 13th, I thought it was a good idea to watch one of that franchise’s movies. The thing is…I was not sure if I had seen the first Friday the 13th. I knew of things that happened in the movie, but it was iconic so I may have just heard about it. I knew the conclusion, but again, it has been around for 40 + years. I was never a fan of slasher movies, but it is a well known one. I knew about Camp Crystal Lake, but that is something that is part of the culture.

So I put the film on and it was not long before I realized that I had not ever seen it which meant that it qualified for the DailyView.

Of course, there are a ton of horror movie clichés in the film, but they were not necessarily clichés at the time. The camp killings have been done many times before, but this is what started it all.

Jason Voorhees is the villainous murderer of the franchise, known for his hockey mask. Ironically, the first film does not include that hockey mask. I had known that, but it was still strange to see. Jason himself does not make much of an appearance since the culprit was in the family.

I was surprised to see Kevin Bacon in the cast. I may have known that in the back of my head, but, if I had, it was not something that I remembered. Most of the rest of the cast were not faces that seemed familiar to me. As with these kin of horror flicks, the characters are not specifically developed. They are in the movie to be victims and to die in terrible ways.

I really liked the way the film set up each killing, showing it to us from the killer’s POV. It was handled like a mystery although the reveal of the killer came out of nowhere. I would have liked to have the Jason stuff sprinkled in the film at least a little. Still, it works for what it was.

Slasher films have never been a favorite of mine, but you have to respect those films that started the craze. Friday the 13th has lasted for years and still is watchable.

Don’t Breathe 2

Five years ago, there was a surprisingly great horror movie called Don’t Breathe. It was the story of a group of kids targeting an old blind man’s house for robbery and being shocked when they discovered that the blind man was a certified killer. That movie turned into a survival movie for the group of kids trying to stave off this crazy old man.

It was an awesome, tense, anxiety-filled film that was a hoot to watch.

Fast forward to 2021 when get get a sequel to that epic film and my expectations were high. Sadly, it crashed down in flames. I have much to say about Don’t Breathe 2.

So The Blind Man (Stephen Lang) returned to the film, this time taking in a little girl and raising her as his daughter. He named her Phoenix (Madelyn Grace) and he kept her secluded from the world, homeschooled and isolated from other children and people. The one exception was Hernandez (Stephanie Arcilla) who would take the little girl into town if the girl passed her survival tests. It was a rare occurrence, but The Blind Man, whose name was Norman Nordstrom, seemed to trust her.

Unfortunately, a group of lowlifes, potentially involved in human organ trafficking, came across the girl and harassed her in a bathroom. The head of this group of scum was named Raylan (Brendan Sexton III) and it is not clear at first why he has such an interest in the little girl. Raylan leads his group to Norma’s house with the intent of taking the little girl.

I’m going to try to not spoil anything here, but I have several problems with the film that I want to address. The first, most glaring issue is that this film expects the audience to cheer for and support Norman after all of the terrible things that he had done in the previous movie. We saw that he was a murderer, a rapist and downright horrible monster, but here, he is taking care of this 11-year old, so he is our protagonist worthy of being cheered for. This is a colossal misjudgment on behave of the studio as I was reminded with every scene that this guy was just horrendous in the last film.

Plus, since he is the protagonist, Norman has to be shown to have more of a vulnerability so the audience could relate to him. He was not the indestructible killing machine as he was in the first movie. We have to see him suffer more to humanize him.

Allowing him to move about his own house without any trouble is one thing, but when the movie changes locations, Norman seems to still have no trouble navigating his way around and being as stealthy as ever.

There is an entire bit with a dog that is totally ridiculous, too.

The film goes out of the way to try and make Raylan even worse than Norman, so when his interest in Phoenix is revealed, they try and make it the most horrible thing possible so Norman’s transgressions look better by comparison. It did not work, by the way. It only made everybody look bad.

Madelyn Grace does a decent job for what she had to do, holding her own on the screen with the adult actors. Stephen Lang is always good, but his work in the first movie made it impossible to really support him in this one.

There are some decent kills, but they are nowhere near cool enough to base the movie on. I was very disappointed in Don’t Breathe 2 as it apparently did not understand the reasoning behind the first film’s success.

2.4 stars

Titan A.E. (2000)

DailyView: Day 107, Movie 179

Titan A.E. is the DailyView for today and it was a spectacular animated science fiction adventure. For some reason, it is rotten at 50% on the Rotten Tomatoes web site. That makes no sense to me because this was a beautifully animated adventure with a strong voice cast and plenty of classic twists.

Earth has been destroyed. It is the 31st century and a young boy Cale (Matt Damon), whose father left him on a question when he was but a boy, suddenly becomes a sought after resource because he has a ring, given to him by his father, that gives a map to Titan, a ship that holds the key to saving the human race.

Cale is approached by Captain Korso (Bill Pullman), who is trying to help Cale get to Titan before the evil Drej, a species of pure energy that is hoping to destroy Titan before it is activated. On Korso’s ship there is Akima (Drew Barrymore), Stith (Janeane Garofalo), Preed (Nathan Lane), and Gune (John Leguizamo).

Titan A.E. is a fun, energetic science fiction romp f an animated movie that has amazingly beautiful images. Combined 2D animation with CGI, Titan A.E. is an amazing looking film. The animation, especially of the time, was cutting edge and really should have been more of a draw than it appeared to be.

Cale and Akima had a great relationship, albeit a little typical for this type of story. They started out not liking each other and developed feelings for one another as the adventure progressed. It had a Han/Leia vibe to it.

This is the reason I think it received several of the rotten reviews. Titan A.E. has a bunch of the science fiction beats that we see in other areas and string them together into this film. While there may not be a lot of material that we hadn’t seen before, there should be some consideration about how effectively the material is presented. Have we seen a lot of this before? Sure, but has the material ever been presented with such flair or energy? I’m not so sure.

The film is paced well, as events move through the short runtime, but it does not feel rushed.

Titan A.E. is an exceptional animated movie that provides some epic sci-fi action. If you are a fan of the genre, you should check out this movie.