Tom Clancy’s Without Remorse

Despite the fact that we are smack dab in the middle of the DailyWatch, there are still new movies being released. This week, Michael B. Jordan’s new film arrives on Amazon Prime, Tom Clancy’s Without Remorse.

John Kelly (Michael B. Jordan), a former Navy SEAL, was home after a mission in Syria that ended up with Russian military being killed. John had a happy future ahead of him as his wife was 8-months pregnant with his first daughter. However, tragedy struck as several members of his team were murdered one night. On the same night, John’a wife is killed and he is shot.

Surviving the assassination attempt, John struggles to overcome his gunshot wounds. He does so very quickly (in a montage, sort of) and then he goes out after the the members of the Russian hit squad that escaped from his home.

Okay, I’m not spending any more time on the plot of this movie because it is so convoluted and messy that it would not be worth the time. The plot of this movie is easily the weak point of Without Remorse as it feels silly and needlessly complicated.

Michael B. Jordon is great as always. He brings the necessary intensity level for this type of movie to be successful, but there just is too much mess here to make it worthwhile.

The action does not elevate the film above its level either. Last year, the Netflix film Extraction was a basic story but the action was so great that it raised the film. Not so here. In fact, several times it was very difficult to see what was going on.

There are some interesting cast members here, but none of them are able to do much more than be on the cast list. Jamie Bell, Jodie Turner-Smith, Guy Pierce, and Lauren London are here but have very little to do.

There was an interesting action scene in a prison cell, but that was the only moment that this finds something original or engaging. The ending was completely disorderly and bad. This was not up to par with other Michael B. Jordan films.

2.1 stars

What’s Eating Gilbert Grape (1993)

This film was recommended by one of my teacher friends awhile ago and I decided to watch it during the DailyView. 1993 and the world had a chance to see that Leonardo DiCaprio was an actor of note.

DiCaprio was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor for this performance, and after watching it, you can see why.

What’s Eating Gilbert Grape told the story of the Grape family in a small Midwestern town, Endora. Gilbert (Johnny Depp) was a young man who struggled to help his family survive after his father disappeared one day to never return. Adding to the difficulties for Gilbert was his mentally-disabled younger brother Arnie (Leonardo DiCaprio) and his extremely obese mother (Darlene Cates), who had been housebound since the disappearance of her husband.

Gilbert worked at the floundering mom and pop grocery store in Endora which would include deliveries to Betty Carver (Mary Steenburgen), a married woman who was having an affair with Gilbert.

Life changed for Gilbert with the arrival of Becky (Juliette Lewis) and her grandmother (Penelope Branning) in town. Their nomadic lifestyle was interrupted when their truck broke down, forcing them to wait in Endora for a part. Gilbert and Becky bonded during the time they spent in the town.

The melodrama was high and the emotional stakes were plenty. DiCaprio never once played a false note with the character of Arnie. Had I not known who Leonardo DiCaprio was, I would be sure that the actor in this film was legitimately mentally-challenged. Every minute he was on screen, DiCaprio was authentic and that was something a role like this was going to be difficult to maintain, especially for a younger actor as he was at the time.

All of these characters held a deep pain just below the surface and struggled constantly to maintain their composure. It was clear that life had been tough for them all and that the hope for a better life had drained away.

With the arrival of Becky, hope reappeared in the eyes of Gilbert, even though his budding relationship lead to other issues with Arnie. You could see Gilbert questioning his life with each moment that passed.

The film did feel a little long, especially in the first act, but the slow burn picked up as the end of the film came. What’s Eating Gilbert Grape showed a lot of heart and gave us some great character work.

Bridesmaids (2011)

Day 3 of the DailyView starts off here at EYG with a movie that I have heard some major positives about. I have heard people claim that this is the best comedy of the last 20 years. It was one of the most intriguing films to add to the list when I started planning this out. It was 2011’s Bridesmaids.

Bridesmaids star Kristen Wiig and Maya Rudolph as lifelong best friends Annie and Lillian. When Lillian told Annie her big news, she was engaged to be married, everything appeared to be perfect. She asked Annie to be her maid of honor and introduced her to the other bridesmaids. This is when chaos ensued.

Lillian’s recent friend, Helen (Rose Byrne), began to cause Annie to feel isolated from her friend and quite jealous over the wealth that Helen could provide, and Helen manipulated the circumstances to her benefit. This was not an uncommon storyline arc. It is something that we have seen in many comedies of the past.

Meanwhile, Annie, who was involved in a meaningless sexual relationship with Jon Hamm, gets pulled over by a police officer Rhodes (Chris O’Dowd) for apparent drunk driving and a broken taillight. I thought the relationship between these tow characters that would develop was one of the best parts of the film.

Another standout was Melissa McCarthy, who played Lillian’s fiancé’s sister Megan. In the world of comedy, she played the strange friend who had things about her that we did not know or understand. While we have seen this kind of character before, McCarthy played the role with such gusto that you can see how she transitioned the role into a career in movies.

My major issue with the movie is not even a problem with the movie. It is my own issue. One of the movie’s most iconic scenes was the “food poisoning” scene at the dress shop, but it is something that I absolutely hate. I have never been a fan of puke scenes and it was one that I had to skip through on mute because it was going to bother me. I know people love that scene, but, for me, it tainted everything else about the movie and nearly caused me to turn it off.

I am glad that I did not shut it off though because I was won over again by the charm of the film and the connect-ability of the characters. Thankfully the food poisoning scene was early enough in the film for me to get past it.

Yes, most of what was here was your typical comedy tropes, but Kristen Wiig, in particular, is so likable that you want to root for her even when she is the one being the jerk. I really found myself rooting for Annie and Rhodes, even though the pairing of them was the secondary storyline.

While I absolutely would not place this on the level that I have seen some place it, I enjoyed most of Bridesmaids and I was pleased that I was able to watch it. I enjoyed the female-centric film and found it, mostly, funny.

Touch of Evil (1958)

Day two of the DailyWatch is done with a classic noir written and directed by Orson Welles. Touch of Evil has plenty of ties to the world today despite being released in 1958.

The amazing Latino actor, Charlton Heston (yes, I know. It was a major distraction throughout the whole movie) played “Mike” Vargas who was coming to a city on the border between the USA and Mexico with his new American wife Susan (Janet Leigh). Vargas was a big time Mexican narcotics officer who had to interrupt his honeymoon after a car bombing shook the town. Police Captain Hank Quinlan (Orson Welles) had the case on the US side of the border and went about hunting down suspects. Quinlan was a legendary figure in the area, but his legend was fueled by some questionable arrests that he had made.

Quinlan had narrowed the suspects down to a Mexican man named Manelo Sanchez (Victor Millan). Quinlan planted evidence in Sanchez’s room, but he had done so in a way that Vargas had known he had done it. This set the two lawmen on opposite sides of the case.

This film has so much to say about the world around us right now that it is amazing that it was made over 60 years ago. The racism on display, the police officers with their corrupt tendencies, the cartels with their drugs. The struggle between the honest police officers and those that abuse their position of authority.

Orson Welles was fantastic as the damaged detective, whose actions became worse as the film moved on. He had existed on reputation for years and when that reputation is shaken by Vargas, he spiraled out of control.

While Charlton Heston is always a great performer, seeing him as a Mexican man is something that he would never be able to do today… just ask Scarlett Johansson.

The film was beautifully shot, the black and white the perfect look for this noir. Welles clearly is a master of the director’s chair and the highlights of this film are tremendous.

Touch of Evil is a great movie that is held back by a little questionable casting.

Watership Down (1978)

Man.

Okay, the animated adaptation of Watership Down from 1978… it is not a movie to show your children. I think I might be having nightmares tonight.

The fourth film in the DailyView binge for today (usually won’t do this many in a day) was Watership Down on HBO Max. I think I kind of knew that this would be a difficult watch, but I had no idea. Bloody. Violent. Heartbreaking.

Watership Down is based on the 1972 novel by Richard Adams. In the film, a rabbit seer named Fiver (voiced by Richard Briers) has a vision of an apocalyptic devastation of the rabbit’s warren and he convinces his brother Hazel (John Hurt) to talk to the tribal chief. When they are rebutted, several of the rabbits decide to leave on their own, facing the dangers and deadly threats that face them in the world.

You can tell almost immediately that this was not going to be a typical animated movie. The British film showed the desperation and the dangers to the rabbits, sometimes in graphic, albeit artist, detail. There are a few sudden moments that act like a kick in the gut to the audience and the attempts to survive are edge of your seat moments.

There is a strong, British voice cast that bring the power to the beautiful imagery being shown. John Hurt and Richard Briers are joined by Michael Graham Cox, John Bennett, Roy Kinnear, Denholm Elliot (aka Marcus Cox from Indiana Jones series), Nigel Hawthorne, Clifton Jones, Harry Andrews, Simon Cadell, and Mary Maddox. The cast also included the final film performance of Zero Mostel as Kehaar the sea gull.

The animation took a painting style and had multiple moments of gorgeous imagery that brought both an impressive design and, honestly, at times horror. It had a watercolor feel to it and brought to mind the children’s picture books. Although the animation felt in this style, the darkness definitely came through in the scary moments as well.

This is well done and excellent animated movie, but it does have times when the imagery or the story beats are disturbing or frightening. The horrors of the outside world threatened these rabbits and you’ll feel it.

Under Siege (1992)

Day one of the DailyView kick off continued with a movie that was leaving HBO Max on April 30th. I decided that it was a good opportunity to see this for the first time.

Honestly, I have never been a fan of movies featuring Steven Seagal or Jean-Claude Van Damme and so I went out of my way to avoid watching any of these when they were released. Without this binge, I would still have never watched it. Having now seen it, I would say that it wasn’t that bad.

Casey Ryback (Steven Seagal) was a cook aboard the battleship Missouri who seemed to have a close connection to the ship’s captain. When the XO Commander Krill (Gary Busey) throws a party for the captain’s birthday, a group of “entertainers,” lead by Tommy Lee Jones with his weird hairdo, arrived on a copter and began to cause chaos.

I have to say that I did enjoy watching Seagal move through the battleship doing damage to the bad guys. The kills were entertaining and creative. Yes, Seagal seems to be in total control of the battles and he is never really in danger, but that is expected in a Seagal movie.

I hated the character played by Baywatch actress Erika Eleniak. She was an annoying, waste of time. I so wanted her to stay in the locker that Seagal originally placed her. This character was able to suddenly do things that she wasn’t able to do five minutes before. She served no purpose. It was so clear that, when she said that she would not kill someone, that she was going to kill someone and save Seagal. I actually said it to myself when she said it.

Tommy Lee Jones was way over-the-top, chewing every scene. He was fun to watch while doing it. Yes, he was pretty one-dimensional doing it, but he was a hoot.

It was dumb and basic, but it was an enjoyable watch. Certainly better than I anticipated. I am glad I watched it before it left HBO Max.

Danger: Diabolik (1968)

After the misstep in the morning for the DailyView review of The Maltese Falcon, I wanted to make sure that I watch a film that I absolutely knew that I had never seen before. So I went to the film that I had heard discussed on John Rocha’s Outlaw Nation podcast from the excellent critic, William Bibbiani. He claimed it was one of his favorite comic book movies of all time. While, for me, that was a hugely hyperbolic comment, it was a fun film.

Diabolik (John Phillip Law) was a master criminal who, along with his girlfriend Eva (Marisa Mell), planned and executed comic book type robberies while being pursued from law enforcement Inspector Ginko (Michel Piccoli).

Diabolik has a James Bond vibe to him, if mixed with the Phantom, Adam West’s Batman and Moriarty. He is a strange protagonist for the film since he was clearly a villain and one who did not care about anyone else but Eva and himself. His actions lead to the deaths of several of the innocent police officers chasing him. Yes, he was, at times, looking to save Eva, but he did not seem to have any other positive characteristics.

Yes, there have been other movies with protagonists who were villainous characters, but not too many who were displayed in such a way to make them look like the cool agent/spy character.

The film was really more of a group of stories hooked together by the attempts of Ginko to catch Diabolik. The different sections of the film did not have an actual throughline outside of that.

There is a lot of camp in the film which helps with the overall tone and feel of the film and allows us to not take the deaths of these law enforcement officers as seriously as we might in a more realistic manner.

Danger: Diabolik has a lot of fun in it and provides viewers with some silly adventure. The acting is average, but the corniness is above the line.

The Maltese Falcon (1941)

Starting today, I will be kicking off the DailyView: EYG 2021 Spring/Summer Unseen Classic Binge. The idea is that I will be watching a movie a day (at least) through the summer months, a movie in which I had never seen before. I am starting the binge off with a multiple movie day. First, up the John Huston film noir classic, The Maltese Falcon.

I will admit that there were some scenes here that were fairly familiar to me, so I have certainly seen some of this movie before. However, this would be the first time that I watched the entire flick, thanks to HBO Max.

Sam Spade (Humphrey Bogart) was a private detective hired by a woman Brigid O’Shaughnessy (Mary Astor) to follow a business partner. Sam’s partner Archer (Jerome Cowan) takes the case and ends up dead. While the police try to determine if Sam was involved in the murder, a plot to find a mysterious statuette called the Maltese Falcon shows to be connected to the happenings.

Bogart played Spade as a manipulative sort and it kept me off balance through the film. I was never quite sure if the detective was as crooked as the people he became involved in.

We meet a henchman named Joel Cairo (Peter Lorre) who was working with the fat man, Kasper Gutman (Sydney Greenstreet) in an attempt to get their hands on the valuable artifact. Greenstreet was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor for his role here.

The mood of the movie is part of the reason this is as successful a film as it has been. It sets the mystery early and gives you several moments throughout where you are just not sure exactly what was going on.

John Huston proved himself to be a master director as he provided a wonderful movie that is considered an all-time classic. Humphrey Bogart gave a layered performance that not only kept you rooting for him, but also wondering what he might do next. Was he being self-destructive or was he a few steps ahead of everybody?

The ending is also as mysterious and uncertain as the rest of the film as it creates perhaps the most famous MacGuffins in cinema history.

{P.S.}- Unfortunately, the film had felt so familiar to me that I went to do some further research and discovered that I had already reviewed the movie and had seen it. Sadly that kicks off the DailyView with a mistake, but we shall press on and not be derailed by a minor error. I decided to leave this review active as well. EYG

Howard the Duck (1986)

In the early seventies, EYG Hall of Famer Steve Gerber created a character for Marvel named Howard the Duck. Howard the Duck’s comic was irreverent, satirical and existential.

Then, producer George Lucas (also an EYG Hall of Famer) got his hands on the property and turned him into a duck from outer space, and he made one of the worst films of all time. The stench of the movie has stained Howard the Duck and potentially ruined any hope for the character to take his place in the MCU.

Yes, Howard the Duck was in the Guardians of the Galaxy (trapped in the Collector’s collection) and even in the final battle in Avengers: Endgame, but no one could consider the chance of a Howard the Duck solo film or Disney + series. That is because of this film.

It is beyond stupid. No one clearly understood what made this character so special.

Howard the Duck (voiced by Chip Zien) gets pulled from his planet Duckworld, by a scientist Dr. Walter Jennings (Jeffrey Jones) during a test of the Spectroscope, a giant laser beam. Howard winds up in Cleveland where he meets musician Beverly Switzler (Lea Thompson) and they bond. Unfortunately, further experiments brought an evil Dark Overlord of the Universe to possess the body of Jennings, sending him on a mission to bring the rest of the Dark Overlords to earth.

Howard the Duck was turned into an action/adventure, campy 80s movie with some of the worst dialogue put to film. Fresh off his iconic role from Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, Jones was over-the-top as the Dark Overlord-in-Jennings’ body . Tim Robbins was here too playing Phil, a lab tech guy. Lea Thompson is nothing but a screeching damsel in distress, the police were total idiots, and we saw Howard’s little condom in his wallet.

Of course, the effects are terrible and Howard, himself, looks horrendous. The character is written improperly and is nothing more than a silly duck jokes and sexual innuendo.

There is a fun song at the end of the movie.

There are plenty of moments in the film that are so stupid that you can laugh at them. Not the comedic parts, mind you, but the parts that are meant to be exciting and fun. It is such a disappointment when compared to the comic book. The acting is terrible and the writing is juvenile. There is a remarkably racist scene at a restaurant that totally uses every negative stereotype from the 1980s and played for comedy.

It is a joke of a movie.

Stowaway

Netflix has a new drama/sci-fi film on its service this weekend that has a small, but powerful cast of actors and a story that matches the skill level of the stars.

Starring Anna Kendrick, Toni Collette, Daniel Dae-Kim and Shamier Anderson, Stowaway tells the story of a three-person mission heading to Mars when it is discovered that there is an unexpected, accidental stowaway on the vessel. Unfortunately, the trip was planned out as a three-person trip and, with the existence of a fourth person, the survival of all comes into question.

The science fiction aspects of the story are minimal, but there is some great science bits. This makes one think of Gravity from a few years ago.

Strength of the film is easily the cast. Anna Kendrick does a great job as the doctor who is the voice for human life. Toni Collette is her normal wonderful self, though I though she could have used more to do in the film. She certainly takes advantage of every minute she is on screen. LOST’s Jin… aka Daniel Dae-Kim is a solid addition and I am really happy to see him here.

The film avoids diving into the clichés that you may expect to happen with this type of moral dilemma presenting a unhappy choice. I was pleased to see the film take a more realistic twist on the story.

The film looked great too. The CGI and the environment of space and inside the ship are well done and match up with anything that you might see on the big screen.

The story does drag a bit at times, in particular, early in the movie. The slow burn might be a turn off for some who expected more of an excitement filled sci-fi flick. When the film brings the anxiety though, it does so in spades.

The biggest issue I had with much of this film is that I was never quite sure what was going on. There was a lot of confusing details, but the moments between characters made these fairly unimportant.

Good acting and some dramatic tension makes Stowaway a decent sci-fi film.

3.6 stars

Mortal Combat (2021)

I was actually looking forward to the new Mortal Kombat movie. No reason. I had only a mild interest in the video game when I was younger and the other Mortal Kombat movie left a lot to be desired. There was just something about this one that intrigued me.

Now after seeing the film on HBO Max, I realized that I was fooling myself. This was terrible.

To be fair, if you are a fan of the video game, there may be more here than I think.

This version was rated R and it was extremely bloody and violent. It is some of that blood that seems to be there for no other reason than to be gory.

MMA fighter Cole Young (Lewis Tang) is a descendent to one of the greatest ninjas of all-time, Hanzo (Hiroyuki Sanada) who had been attacked and killed by Sub-Zero (Joe Taslim) in an attempt to remove the bloodline. Now, Cole is trying to gather the heroes of earth to battle against the forces of Outworld. Head of those forces, Shang Tsung (Chin Han), is trying to destroy earth’s forces before the great tournament that would put the world’s fate in balance.

This is so dumb. I will state off the bat that the movie has some good fight scenes, though I thought the blood was a distraction. The CGI was certainly better than the original movie, which had some of the worst CGI of the time. The acting was okay. I would not push it any farther than that.

The story was weak. The dialogue was terrible. We have very little connection to any of the characters outside of the fact that they had a resemblance to the characters we know from the game. The third act featured one of the sloppiest deus ex machinas that I have seen in quite awhile.

I expect that this is one of those movies, like the Fast and the Furious franchise, that everyone says you have to understand what kind of movie it is and that you should not come into Mortal Kombat expecting much. I’ve never truly understood that thinking. Either a movie is good or it is not. It is subjective so you really shouldn’t need to clarify why you like a movie when it is a piece of garbage. The new Mortal Kombat movie is garbage, but there are plenty of people who will defend it as “fun” and that this is one of those “types” of films. I wish I found much of anything in this fun so maybe I could stick my head in the sand and pretend that this is a good movie. It is not.

1.7 stars

Come True

Conflicted.

For most of the time I was watching the Canadian horror/sci-fi film, Come True, I was mesmerized. There is a lot to like here. However, the ending of this film really takes the story in directions that…one, I did not see coming and…two, make very little sense.

18-year-old runaway Sarah Dunne (Julia Sarah Stone) sets herself up for a sleep disorder study to deal with her recurring nightmares. Soon, she discovers that the sleep study has more going on than one expects.

However, that is not what this movie is about. It is about dreams and about the nightmares that frighten us all. Or is it?

Through much of the film’s run time, Come True is beautifully shot and creates a feel of a living dream by the use of lights and imagery that is in a constant haze. It really is a lovely looking movie and one that is unlike any I have seen in quite a long time.

Narratively speaking, I have no idea exactly what happened.

Perhaps that is the purpose. Dreams can be a confusing and disjointed experience and maybe that is what this film is trying to portray. It just feels as if the third act of this movie took what was developing nicely in the first hour of the film and tossed it aside for a shock ending that is meant to be smarter than it turned out to be. The last part of this movie was a real letdown.

However, the first two acts were very strong and moved things along extremely well. There were plenty of situations that may have confused you, but it felt as if there was a progression of the story, and, again, it is beautifully shot. The acting is very solid, despite the cast being a group of actors whom I had never seen before. I really liked Julia Sarah Stone in this film. She felt as if she dominated the screen when she appeared and she carried herself like a star.

The other major role here was that of Jeremy (Landon Liboiron), but, after seeing the ending of the movie, his importance in the film may be up for debate. He was believable here.

I am happy I watched this, but I cannot shake the feeling that I was thinking that this could have been a classic film, only to have it spoiled by a nonsensical ending. After the first hour or so, I was thinking that this would be somewhere in the 4.5 stars range, but it took quite a downturn in my opinion. I’d still recommend you watch it, but temper your expectations.

3.2 stars

The Courier

Benedict Cumberbatch has been making a career outside of the MCU playing characters that are real life people with gigantic stories to tell. He was Stuart Couch in the Mauritanian. He was Alan Turning in The Imitation Game. He was Billy Bulger in Black Mass. Now he is Greville Wynne in The Courier.

The Courier tells the true story of a British businessman, in the heart of the Cold War, recruited by MI6 to meet with Russian informant Colonel Oleg Penkovsky (Merab Ninidze) who had vital information that dealt with world safety. Taking place around the time of the Cuban Missile Crisis, The Courier highlighted the courageous actions of two men inside the former Soviet Union leading to vital intelligence coming to the West.

The movie does a fantastic job of showing the relationship between Wynne and Oleg. Among the danger and the espionage happening, these two formed a bond of friendship that is put to the test later in the movie. It shows how two people from different background and lands can put aside any issues they may have and make a connection.

Benedict Cumberbatch is tremendous here, continuing his strong run of roles. He has shown quite admirably that he is more than just Doctor Strange or Sherlock Holmes. His well-roundedness is on display once again in these true stories.

This was a tale that I had never heard about and the drama behind the Cuban Missile Crisis is always intense and suspenseful. The world was quite literally on the brink of nuclear war and the way that informs this story is well done. The Courier provides us with an old school spy thriller feel and keeps you on the edge of your seat. Something happens in the third act that I was not expecting and I found myself completely engrossed in it.

The beginning of the movie was a little slow, but it ratcheted up quickly as it progressed. There was a sub story with both men and their individual marriages. in particular, Sheila (Jessie Buckley), wife of Greville Wynne who believed he was having another affair in his constant trips to the USSR. The relationships in The Courier are truly the main attraction of the movie.

This is a strong film with a story that is both tense and exceptional that was unknown enough to make it engaging.

4 stars

Mortal Kombat (1995)

Next weekend, Warner Brothers will release a new movie version of the classic video game Mortal Kombat, which reboots the series from a movie from 1995 that is considered a fun film by some. I had never seen the film before and I thought it might be a good idea to watch before the new movie next week. In retrospect, I sure hope that next week’s new film is better than this.

Bringing all of the main characters from the video game, Mortal Kombat sets up a mystical tournament that is meant to save the world. That is about it for a plot.

We had Johnny Cage (Linden Ashby), Sonya Blade (Bridgette Wilson), Liu Kang (Robin Shou) join Lord Raiden (Christopher Lambert) into the battle. The sorcerer Shang Tsung (Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa) was here too on the villainous side.

There is such a bunch of crap here. The dialogue is laughable. The special effects are terrible, even for 1995. The characters are cardboard. There is no basic plot. The action was okay.

Shang Tsung is the mustache-twirling villain with nothing much more than that. Sub-Zero and Scorpion are here, but are way under represented. Goro is ridiculous looking.

I could understand someone liking this if you are hoping for something really stupid just to watch. Really stupid is exactly what this is. Can it be fun? Maybe. I still hope next week’s film is deeper.

Voyagers

The new sci-fi film hitting the theaters this weekend is Voyagers, and the basic premise of the film is Lord of the Flies in outer space.

In order to find a new world to inhabit because the earth was dying, a group of children are bred and birthed for a specific purpose: to be the people who give birth to the kids who would reestablish humanity. Since the trip would take 86 years, they needed a multigenerational approach.

As these young kids are growing, they are being instructed and protected by Richard (Colin Ferrell). When strange noises start happening outside the spaceship, Richard and Zac (Fionn Whitehead) were going to find out what it was. However, Zac and Christopher (Tye Sheridan) had discovered that the blue liquid that the group was required to drink daily was a drug to suppress sexual feelings and other emotions and they decided to stop taking it.

Without the drug, Zac became more wild and uncontained. When tragedy struck, Zac and Christopher wound up on opposite sides among the crew.

Sela (Lily-Rose Depp) was the medical examiner and one of the group of kids was with Christopher. She was pretty good here though I was not sure the reason why she and Christopher had the connection they had.

This movie had a couple of moments and a fascinating premise, but not enough for this to be successful. The characters are dull and uninspiring. I could not get the idea of Lord of the Flies out of my head the entire time. I was connecting characters with the novel and that became a distraction for me.

Fact is the movie is pretty forgettable and there is nothing that stands out. It is lightweight and unremarkable.

2 stars