I went into Welcome with Marwen expecting it to be bad because of the critical scores that I have heard about it.  Rotten Tomatoes score was low (27%) and the audience score was in the 50s.  I also was not a huge fan of the trailers so I had pushed off seeing it until today.

This is why you should always make your own mind up.

I thought Welcome to Marwen was way better than I expected and I enjoyed the film.  Now, there are some issues that I will get to, but this is, in no way, a film that I would expect to be at 27% on Rotten Tomatoes.

Welcome to Marwen tells the story of artist Mark Hogancamp (Steve Carell) who had been attacked at a bar one night three years before because, while drunk, he had told a gang of thugs that he liked to wear women’s shoes.  They savagely beat him within an inch of his life and left him for dead.  Mark had lost all his memories from before the attack and could no longer draw with his hand.  So he took up photography and used dolls to tell his story about the Belgian town of Marwen, set in World War II.

However, the dolls he had in these photos represented people that he knew in the town he lived in, mostly women and the villainous Nazis were the thugs who had attacked him.   Every time these Nazis would be killed in his photos, they would come back.

When beautiful new neighbor Nicol (Leslie Mann), “Nicole but without the ‘e'”, moved in, Mark got a crush and introduced a new redhead doll into the mix.

The movie is the story of how Mark was able to overcome the attack and to gain a modicum of his life back.  The dolls’ adventures were shown on screen via motion capture in some real creative ways.  The connections between the story of Hogie and the Women of Marwen in World War II echoed the real life of Mark.  It was not very subtle.

Steve Carell was great again in this role. He has become a consistent performer, delivering strong work in every role he takes.  There was an innocence about Mark that helped get him past the panic attacks and the memories that he did have.

Now, yes, I do believe that the women in Marwen were too accepting and, I personally, if I were Nicol, the introduction of the red head doll named Nicol as Hogie’s love interest, should have set off some alarms.  In fact, I think that she was just not creeped out enough about this man she just met and his strange obsession with the toys.  Maybe it speaks to the strength of her character, but it did not feel realistic.

You would think that as soon as the doll Hogie and the doll Nicol were being set up kissing, she may have wanted to have a talk with him about where they stood.

There is also a weird feel when watching the film because I am not sure that the movie specifically knows what it wants to present.  Still, I found myself liking this more than I thought I would.  Perhaps the lowered expectations paid off again.  I thought Welcome to Marwen, despite its flaws, has some wonderful scenes and gives a tale of a man overcoming his fears and his obstacles.  That is a lesson that we need to hear more.

Remember, make up your own mind.  It does not matter what anyone else says.

3.4 stars

A Quiet Place showed us a world where making a sound was the first step to death.  Bird Box takes that same idea but changed it to the sense of sight, presenting us with an entirely new set of conflicts to deal with.

Sandra Bullock stars in this Netflix original film that tries to capture some of the tension and anxiety associated with A Quiet Place, and succeeds for the most part.

A strange compulsion for mass suicide swept the world, caused by the humans seeing something that caused them to take their lives.  Malorie (Bullock), pregnant and scared after her sister (Sarah Paulson) dies, finds herself barricaded in a house with a group of other survivors who have avoided seeing the strange force.

Unfortunately, we know that this situation is temporary as that part of the story is unfolding, we see, at the same time, five years in the future as Malorie and two children named Boy (Julian Edwards) and Girl (Vivien Lyra Blair) make a desperate trek down a river, blindfolded and frightened.

The dual stories play out together as we see how the one time frame eventually melds into the other.

Spoiler

Like in A Quiet Place, we never really get any answers about what it is that has caused the world so much terror. Although, in A Quiet Place, they do drop some distinct hints in the background information.  I feel like there is absolutely zero explanation in Bird Box.  I really think this film needed something to tell us what this monster/force was.  The unknown here subtracted from the story and, while I do not need a detailed explanation, something would have helped.

END of Spoiler

The cast does a fine job in creating the terror of the situation, even if it is difficult to believe that they are able to avoid looking during this entire time.  Sandra Bullock is great, as is Trevante Rhodes, who played Tom.  John Malkovich was here as Douglas, aka jerk #1.  Every apocalypse needs one.  Lil Rel Howery is here too as the tension needed to be broken once and awhile.

Then, I was almost certain that Andrew Lincoln was stepping out in a scene.  He didn’t but you’ll know the place.

Bird Box is a decent ride with some definite tension, but the fact that we know Malorie has the kids on the river really bodes poorly for the others in the house, cutting down the tension in that situation.  And it is difficult to believe that she could maneuver through the woods blindfolded without killing herself.

Still, it had its moments and was enjoyable enough.

3.4 stars

This is the second period piece surrounding a Queen of England this holiday season.  Mary Queen of Scots was the first one I saw, which featured Queen Elizabeth while The Favourite features Queen Anne.

Of course, the two films could not be more different.  Mary, Queen of Scots is a drama surrounding the power of a woman and the men looking to bring her down where as The Favourite is a dark comedy featuring the nasty things a couple of women would do to gain favor with the Queen.

Queen Anne (Olivia Colman) is ruling over a country at war with France, but she has to deal with the daily problems of a monarch.  Her friend and confidant Lady Sarah Churchill (Rachel Weisz) helps with the oft-ill Queen and aids in decision making in her stead.  When new servant Abigail (Emma Stone) arrives at the castle, she begins playing different sides against one another to raise the level of her happenstance.

The interactions and manipulations between the three lead ladies in this movie is the main strength of the film.  Olivia Colman is just brilliant as the lonely and forlorn monarch.  She brings so much emotion and gravitas to the role that you can see why her name has been bandied about in Oscar discussions.  Queen Anne has to deal with physical pain from the gout, emotional pain from the loss of children, and the loneliness of the throne which finds her snapping into uncontrollable rages over the littlest things when she feels slighted (in particular from a low self-image about her appearance) or feels as if there are parts of life in which she is missing out upon.

Rachel Wiesz’s Lady Sarah has taken to the power of having the ear (among other body parts) of the Queen and she is not afraid to play that power with the household staff or the heads of state.  When Abigail arrives, Lady Sarah takes a liking to her and, before she realized what had happened, Abigail had usurped her place at the Queen’s side and in her bed.

You can tell immediately that Emma Stone was more of a force than she was being given credit for and that Lady Sarah would regret the oversight.

Directed by Yorgos Lanthimos (The Lobster, The Killing of a Sacred Deer), The Favourite dives deeply into the world of these three women and their desires and wishes.  Two women who want to gain power by the hand of the Queen and a Queen who encourages the jealousy while slowly succumbing to pain and anguish.  The movie lacks a strong conclusion, but the darkness of the comedic takes makes up for the missing aspects and three dominant performances make this a must see.

3.75 stars

Vice is the story of Dick Chaney and how he became the most powerful vice-president the United States had ever seen.

Vice is written and directed by Adam McKay, who also did The Big Short.  There are many techniques that are used here that are used similarly to that movie.  The use of breaking the fourth wall and talking directly to the audience is used effectively again and again.

The film definitely has a left lean to it, but, as the film itself says, these are the facts.

This biopic follows the adult life of Dick Chaney (Christian Bale) through some early life drinking problems to public service (which could be argued about exactly what public was being serviced).  Amy Adams was his wife Lynne, who is shown to be loyal, remarkably strong and nearly as power hungry as her husband.  Steve Carell portrays Donald Rumsfeld, a man tied to Cheney throughout the years.  Sam Rockwell is President George W. Bush, who is shown as someone who just wanted to be President and was happy to have someone take some of the “heavy lifting” away.

The film is darkly funny.  You see the manipulative things Cheney did to get himself ahead and you wonder how he got away with it.  You also can see how we came to be in our current state of politics in the U.S. today.

The whole Iran deal really makes this group of people look terrible.  As if they cared more about their own goals than those of the country.  One wonders how close to the truth this movie comes because if it is close, these people are responsible for some terrible choices in American history.  History may judge them sharply.

In the middle of the film, SPOILERS… the credits begin to roll and it acts as if the movie was over.  It was a great and extremely funny bit, interrupted by a phone call to the Cheneys.  One wonders what would have happened had George W. Bush and his people had not decided to give a call to Dick Cheney.   How different would our world be or would someone else have stepped into the vacuum and been just as bad?

Also, the narrator (Jesse Plemons)…whoa.

Vice was entertaining and took a dark and controversial time in our countries history and was able to show both the outrage and the humor.  Adam McKay was able to once again use a difficult topic to create an entertaining movie.  It may be too political for some people’s taste, but I loved it.

4.25 stars

I wish I knew how to start this review.

It is complete and total sh*t

How about that?

I have never been a fan of Will Ferrell, but every once in awhile he does a film that I do not hate, and I like John C. Reilly quite a bit so he helped elevate the hope.

No…no hope.  This is horrendous.

Ferrell plays legendary Sherlock Holmes and Reilly plays his companion Dr. Watson in a film that might have been meant to be a farce, but failed in every way possible.  The pair has to try to stop the evil Professor Moriarty (Ralph Fiennes) who has challenged them from preventing him from killing Queen Victoria (Pam Ferris) in four days.  These two then bumble around London trying to solve this mystery before the Queen is murdered.

Sherlock Holmes is shown to be a buffoon, loud and obnoxious, as if he were just any other character that Will Farrell ever plays.  Making Holmes an idiot could have worked, I suppose, if Watson was made to be the smart one, but he is every bit as much of an imbecile and Holmes is.

There is no humor in this movie.  Nothing but dick jokes and stupidity that might (and I say MIGHT) appeal to the lowest of lowbrow.  If you giggle every time someone says the word “penis” then you MAY find some of this funny.  If you want more from your humor, well, this is the wrong place to look for it.

The film was a slight 90 minutes, but it felt like it was forever.  And that was despite having the story flying by at a breakneck pace.  There was no time to set up jokes or to allow something to build up because we were on to the next unfunny moment.

The film even completely steals a joke from the Tick animated series.  When Sherlock goes to see his brother Mycroft (Hugh Laurie), Watson is taken to the Companion lounge to wait for him.  This is the exact joke of the Sidekick Lounge from The Tick episode Tick vs. Tick.  The difference is that the Tick episode took some time and milked the laughs out of the premise where in Holmes and Watson, it is nothing more than a sight gag.  If you’re going to steal a joke from someone, you should at least do it justice.

At IMDB, Etan Cohen is listed as sharing writing credit with Arthur Conan Doyle, EYG Hall of Famer.   I am sure that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is rolling over in his grave being connected to this travesty in any way, let alone as a writer.  Just imagining how this film treats the iconic Sherlock Holmes would fill Doyle with anger and disgust.

I was preparing to give this film 0 stars, but then the film tossed in a musical number with Sherlock and Watson singing and, while completely out of place for the movie, felt reasonably clever, and I did enjoy the song.  It was in the third act and really did not have any sort of consequence to the end of the movie, but it had cute lyrics and was catchy.  And it was not completely horrid as the rest of the film was.

Of course there was a vomit joke, which I absolutely hate, but why not.

The film tossed in plenty of current day allusions (selfies, Trump, women equality) into the 19th Century story.  They were clearly meant to be funny, but they all failed miserably.

There were multiple times that I considered leaving the movie, but I stuck it out until the bitter end.  I actively thought to myself that my bathroom break in the middle of the film was the best part of the movie.  The strong supporting cast (Ralph Fiennes, Steve Coogan, Hugh Laurie, Rebecca Hall, Kelly Macdonald, Noah Jupe) is totally wasted and I had to wonder what exactly Ferrell had on them to get them to be in this painful movie.

Save your money.  Go see Spider-man: Into the Spider-verse, Mary Poppins Returns, Bumblebee or Aquaman.  All are heads and shoulders better than this piece of crap.

0.25 stars

There have been a lot of chatter about this movie being considered for Oscar nominations, for both the film and for Ethan Hawke, its main star, but I have to say, I am not seeing that.

Ethan Hawke is solid here, but I did not enjoy First Reformed very much.

Reverend Ernst Toller (Ethan Hawke) is a middle-aged pastor with a tragic backstory at a small church in upstate New York.  He spends his days giving tours of the church, which was once a stop on the Underground Railway.  When one of his parishioner (Amanda Seyfried) comes to him and requests that Reverend Toller talk with her husband, a radical environmentalist who could be planning something violent, a crisis in faith and hope springs into the heart of Toller.

The film deals with many weighty topics, including climate change and how the people of the planet are affecting the negative change and the church’s silence on the topic.  This felt a bit preachy, ironic I know.

Toller is also sick, suffering through a tumor that is slowly causing him to fade away.  The tumor continued to work on his faith as does his developing relationship with Seyfried to lead Toller to take some drastic steps.

Reverend Toller is having a crisis of faith and, perhaps even, a breakdown of some sort.  It is unclear how much the cancer that is destroying his body (if that is even a real thing) is causing this to happen.  There is a dream-like point of view throughout the movie that makes specifics difficult to maintain.

All I know for certain is that the film failed to maintain my attention very well and, despite a strong performance from Ethan Hawke, I was not happy with where the film was going.  Then, the underwhelming ending did not help in the consideration of the movie.  I have very little faith for this film.

2.4 stars

Finally had a chance to watch Roma on Netflix today and I have to say that it was extremely powerful and emotionally affecting.

I have never been a big fan of reading my movies, so I have avoided other foreign language films, but if they are all the quality of this movie, maybe I need to rethink that.

I will admit that I had some difficulty following the story early, partially with the language barrier and partially with the fact that I was streaming the film at home and there were plenty of distractions around me.

However, once the story was well involved, I was fully engaged.

The performance of Yalitza Aparicio as Cleo was heart-wrenching and powerful.  She certainly will deserve the Oscar attention that she is going to receive.  There were two or three moments in the movie that felt like I had been punched in the gut and that I had to hold my breath to make it through.

This is probably the biggest criticism I have of Roma is that there are some moments that are just tremendously emotional, but these moments are connected together with too many unremarkable scenes.  I believe the idea was to show the family life of a typical family but there are too many moments that do not catch my attention.  So it is like both ends of the spectrum.

The film itself is a beautifully designed and shot masterpiece.  The black and white it stunning and the cinematography is masterful.  Director Alfonso Cuarón shows his remarkable skills in putting together the technical aspects of the movie.  It is a piece of art.  Word indicates that this is a personal story for Cuarón who created a film that details much of his own story as a youth in Mexico and the life of his mother.

Roma is a wonderful movie that may have a difficult time with audiences that do not want to take that leap of a foreign language film.  The scenes that really hit, hit amazingly hard, but there are others that seem mundane.  That actually may be the idea behind it, but I think it may end up being a drawback.

4 stars

I have heard decidedly mixed reviews about the sequel and return of Mary Poppins in the new Disney film.  It had sounded as if many people liked the film, but did not love it.  To me, the film is magic.

Just magic.

This was way better than I anticipated.  I loved this film.  I loved the portrayal of Mary Poppins by Emily Blunt, stepping into the shoes of Julie Andrews.  I thought Lin-Manuel Miranda was wonderful.  I loved most of the music.  There was just so much to love.

Michael Banks (Ben Whishaw) has had some troubles.  Since his wife passed away, Michael has been struggling.  He is about to lose his house and his sister Jane (Emily Mortimer) wants to help him.  Because of this, Michael’s children have had to grow up quicker than they should.

Enter… Mary Poppins, who returned as if she hadn’t aged a day, and takes up her mantel as the nanny for the Banks children, helping teach lessons to everybody, especially the adults.

Now, the film itself really hits the same beats as the original Mary Poppins.  There is the animation section.  The big dance number from the lamplighters instead of chimney sweeps.  The bank drama was here as well.

However, that did not matter.  There were so many wonderful scenes here.  I found myself completely engulfed by the story and the songs.  I had tears in my eyes and a huge smile on my face from the joyous nature that I was feeling.

Emily Blunt was perfectly cast.  I can’t imagine the idea of having someone try to take the role of the iconic nanny over but Blunt does it unbelievably well.

The new Banks children are played by Pixie Davies, Nathanael Saleh, and Joel Dawson and they do some great work here.  The children in this movie had to be charming and solid because they carry a lot of the narrative and if they are average, this movie does not work at all.  Thankfully, these kids are great.

There were also several fun cameos, including Dick Van Dyke (who can still break a move), Meryl Streep and Angela Lansbury.

I am so happy that I finally saw this tonight. I took my mother to this on Christmas Eve and I was very happy to share this experience with her.

4.75 stars

I knew very little about the history of this time period in England and Scotland.  I would have known Mary, Queen of Scots by name and that is about it.  After watching this film, I am still not sure I know much about her.  All I know is that Saoirse Ronan is quite an actor.

This pseudo-biopic (I believe much of the history is fudged) followed the temperamental reign of Mary Stuart (Saoirse Ronan) over Scotland and the political drama that engulfed her, not only from Elizabeth of England, but her own court that surrounded Mary.

Watching this, I felt very badly for Mary and I wanted these traitorous men to pay.  Sadly, justice was not coming for these scummy men and the end of the Queen of Scots turns out quite tragic.

Saoirse Ronan is amazing as the titular role.  She brightens the screen every time she is there.  Elizabeth is played by Margot Robbie to a lesser extent.  Elizabeth was also a tragic figure in the world of British monarchs, but she feels very much less connected to the audience than Ronan does.

This is typically the opposite of what these two historical women are seen as.  In fact, Mary, Queen of Scots is also referred to as “Bloody Mary” and there are no examples that would require that sort of nickname.  It makes one wonder exactly how history is being told and from whose perspective they are recording it.

Casting aside the questions about the historical accuracy of the film (which honestly, is not that important of a detail), the film itself is fine, but it is considerably better because of the strong performance by Ronan.  The males in the film are basically just there.  Heck, I saw David Tennent’s name in the credits, but I never realized that he was in the film.  That is how unnoticeable the males turn out to be.

The powerful women being harassed and manipulated by the men in their lives is a definite theme here and can be connected to the current world easily.  It would have been interesting to see Mary, Queen of Scots with a little more backbone, able to take on these weasels, but I suppose it may be what happened.

The film did feel fairly long and I was not overly happy with the outcome.  Again, I get it.  It is what happened.  Still, there is a great performance by Saoirse Ronan and a solid one form Margot Robbie.

3.1 stars