Day: January 14th, Movie: 14

During my search for potential Genre-ary Sci-Fi DailyView films, I found this on Hulu and it piqued my curiosity. Peter Dinklage is a solid actor and a good post apocalyptic story is always a fun time. You know what I mean…

Well, I Think We’re Alone Now is nothing really special. It is an okay film that banks on the strength of its main lead actors to carry it through. It just felt as if the promise of potential was unfulfilled.

Del (Peter Dinklage) was a sole survivor of a small town after a worldwide pandemic wiped out human life. Del believed he was alone and went about his life, clearing out houses and burying the dead. One night, Del saw fireworks and realized that there maybe someone else out there. The next day, he discovered Grace (Elle Fanning) unconscious in her car. He first does not want her around, but she sticks with him and they bond.

While both Peter Dinklage and Elle Fanning are excellent actors and they do good work here, I did not get the romantic feel between them. For most of the film, it felt like they were just two people who were lonely and who spent time together. The romance felt pushed.

The story took a strange turn in the third act which also felt tagged on. There were some interesting ideas introduced, but it seemed like a different movie. Honestly, I found the last part of the movie to be potentially intriguing, but rushed because it showed up at the end and did not have a ton of development throughout. It did not fit into the tale that they were spinning. I did enjoy the arrival of Paul Giamatti though.

This was not the worst film I have seen, but there really isn’t that much here to really remember. I believe that there are better post apocalyptic films that take more risks and are more entertaining. This has two great actors in an average film.

Day: January 13, Movie: 13

This film is destined to be done by RiffTrax. I’m actually surprised that it hasn’t been done yet.

This thing was just unbelievably bad, in just about every aspects of filmmaking. The acting, the special effects, the story, editing… everything.

According to IMDB, “A delicious, mysterious goo that oozes from the earth is marketed as the newest dessert sensation, but the tasty treat rots more than teeth when zombie-like snackers who only want to consume more of the strange substance at any cost begin infesting the world.“

This started immediately. An old man found this bubbling white substance coming from the earth and, this guy, as anyone would, thought it was a good idea to taste it. I know that this was the first thought I had. This was just the start of the ridiculousness that was The Stuff.

Michael Moriarty played David, a former FBI agent who became involved in the case. Moriarty was giving the worst accent (or best Benoit Blanc imitation) I have ever heard. The film also featured Garrett Morris, Paul Sorvino and Danny Aiello. Obviously, someone had pictures worthy of blackmail to get these serious actors to participate in this stupid movie.

I believe there was some intention for this to be a satire dealing with the consumerism of the American public, but that does not come past the idiotic story.

There was a scene where Jason (Scott Bloom), a kid who had seen the Stuff moving in his refrigerator one night, and was running from his family who was trying to get him hooked on the substance as well, jumped into a car with total stranger David, who pulled up and yelled at the boy to get in. Jason did not even wonder if this was a good idea. Perhaps there were less dangers back in the 80s.

When I saw Abe Vigoda and Clara Peller (Where’s the Beef?) cameo, it was well past knowing what I was watching.

The thing is… the movie was kind of entertaining because it was so bad. This would be the perfect RiffTrax film. I sure hope they come across it. Meanwhile, this was terrible.

Day: January 12th, Movie: 12

This film, which I had never seen before, led to a long running TV show based on it, but I had not watched it either. However, i was aware of Stargate. The TV show featured Richard Dean Anderson (MacGyver himself). However, I was not aware of the original film cast which was one of the reasons I was attracted to this film.

I love James Spader. I love Kurt Russell. Both of them in the same movie made Stargate something that I was happy to include in the Genre-ary Sci-Fi DailyView.

After watching this on HBO Max, I have thoughts.

First, according to Rotten Tomatoes, “In modern-day Egypt, professor Daniel Jackson (James Spader) teams up with retired Army Col. Jack O’Neil (Kurt Russell) to unlock the code of an interstellar gateway to an ancient Egypt-like world. They arrive on a planet ruled by the despotic Ra (Jaye Davidson), who holds the key to the Earth travelers’ safe return. Now, in order to escape from their intergalactic purgatory, Jackson and O’Neil must convince the planet’s people that Ra must be overthrown.”

Stargate was fun, but it had several moments of real dumbness. Let me start with James Spader. He was great in the film as Daniel Jackson. He played the wonder of the situation beautifully and he made every scene better. Kurt Russell was fine, but I have seen him play this type of role before. However, he is Kurt Russell and he always is watchable. This is no exception.

The effects of the film were pretty decent. It was 1994 and this held up fairly well.

The premise behind the story was pretty good too. I really enjoyed the first act of the film as Daniel was trying to determine what the Stargate was and how it worked. This was definitely the best part of the film. When they went through the Stargate and wound up on the Egypt-like desert planet, things started to take steps backward.

The people they met on this planet were not very relatable. The problem with the language differences kept me from engaging them. Then, the villains were totally campy. They were dressed like Egyptian gods and that just did not work. Some of the dialogue needed to be better, especially in the second and third acts.

Despite the many troubles of the film, there was something fun about Stargate. Director Roland Emmerich is known for the big, dumb, epic films such as Independence Day, White House Down, and The Patriot. He was also responsible for Moonfall, Independence Day: Resurgence, and Godzilla (1998). Stargate falls in between these films. It’s dumb, but fun.

Day: January 11th, Movie: 11

This was another film that was filled with bizarre moments and a variety of tones. Slaughterhouse-Five is a comedy, a sci-fi film, a war movie and a drama. It is an odd mishmash of tones that do not always blend together well.

Billy Pilgrim (Michael Sacks) kicked off the movie writing a letter to a newspaper claiming to being “unstuck in time” and bouncing around his life span. He goes to his past as a young soldier behind enemy lines during World War II. He and a group of other Americans were captured and taken to the German city Dresden.

We also see Billy in a present day where he is married to his wife, Valencia (Sharon Gans) with a couple of adult children. Valencia died by accident after she was racing to the hospital to see Billy, who had been involved in a plane crash.

We also got a vision of Billy’s future and his death. Billy wound up on the planet Tralfamadore (which was a series of planets used in Kurt Vonnegut novels, of which this film was inspired).

I was never sure if I was supposed to laugh at some of the things that were happening or if I was supposed to be upset by them. The narrative structure of bouncing around the timeline was interesting and did remind me of the format of LOST episode The Constant (though the actual story of the TV show was different than Slaughterhouse-Five).

Michael Sacks did a great job as the main protagonist of this movie, having to display different times of the same character. He was able to create several distinct characters out of the same person. I thought that the rest of the cast was overacting or were not up to the lead performance.

Slaughterhouse-Five was a sci-fi war, dramady that just did not work together very well. It was fascinating at first, but the unstable tone caused me to feel put off by the movie.

Day: January 10th, Movie:10

I went to HBO Max tonight for the next film in the Genre-ary Sci-Fi DailyView. It was Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius. I had never watched an episode of the TV show, so I had no expectations coming in to Jimmy Neutron. Apparently, the TV series was the sequel to the film, which had received an Oscar nomination among

According to IMDB, “Jimmy Neutron is a boy genius and way ahead of his friends, but when it comes to being cool, he’s a little behind. All until one day when his parents, and parents all over Earth are kidnapped by aliens, it’s up to him to lead all the children of the world to rescue their parents.”

This movie was fun and silly. It had a good humor to it and the computer generated animation was decent. I was surprised when I heard Martin Short’s voice as one of the alien creatures.

Other voices in the film included Debi Derryberry, Patrick Stuart, Carolyn Lawrence, Rob Paulson, Frank Welker, Bob Goen, Mary Hart, Megan Cavanagh, Mark DeCarlo, Jeffrey Garcia, Crystal Scales, David L. Lander, Jim Cummings, Billy West, Kimberly Brooks, Candi Milo, and Dee Bradley Baker.

The tone of the movie was definitely for a younger audience, but I still found this entertaining. There was some clever writing and the story was simple but well done.

Day: January 9th, Movie: 9

I watched a film tonight called Explorers, which was perhaps the most ultimate ’80s movie I have seen in a long time. It felt in the same vein as The Goonies, Short Circuit, and The Flight of the Navigator. It was the debut for both Ethan Hawke and River Phoenix. Then, it took a turn and just became the weirdest thing I have seen in a long time.

Ben (Ethan Hawke) and Wolfgang (River Phoenix) are two teens working on a project, an idea that came from Ben’s dreams. A blueprint that he had to remember and write down when he would wake up. Meanwhile, Ben was having trouble with other kids at school and he was rescued form a beating by Darren Woods (Jason Presson). The three boys started working together when the dreams lead to a huge breakthrough… the design of a spaceship.

Around this time, this movie went completely batshit crazy.

I am not sure that I have seen anything like this. When the kids were able to create their spaceship, they heading into space and meet up with some aliens and… I do not know how to explain this. There was a spider-robot thing that I really thought was about to anally probe Ben.

And that wasn’t the strangest thing.

The film did not have much of a story, and several of the early film ideas were dropped. The special effects were decent, but dated. ILM did do the effects for this movie and a lot of what they did seemed practical.

You could see that Ethan Hawke had a future ahead of him and it was sad watching the dearly departed River Phoenix. They were vey skilled and made this bizarre movie all the better.

Day: January 8th, Movie: 8

Personally, I have not been a big fan of Christopher Nolan’s work. Outside of The Dark Knight, Batman Begins and Memento, I have found his films to be overrated and disappointing. I had never seen The Prestige before and when it popped up on some sci-fi lists, I thought the Genre-ary Sci-Fi DailyView would be the perfect opportunity to put this film in the watched column.

However, looking at the synopsis, it did not seem like much of a sci-fi film. The entry on Wikipedia called it “science fantasy” so I was unsure if it actually would qualify for the Genre-ary. However, after watching it, I absolutely believe that a major section of the film fell into the category of sci-fi and would work perfectly well in this category.

According to IMDB, “In the end of the nineteenth century, in London, Robert Angier (Hugh Jackman), his beloved wife Julia McCullough (Piper Perabo), and Alfred Borden (Christian Bale) are friends and assistants of a magician. When Julia accidentally dies during a performance, Robert blames Alfred for her death, and they become enemies. Both become famous and rival magicians, sabotaging the performance of the other on the stage. When Alfred performs a successful trick, Robert becomes obsessed trying to disclose the secret of his competitor with tragic consequences.”

The world of magic set in this period piece was already intriguing enough, but the film added several key moments. Hugh Jackman and Christian Bale are fantastic in their co-lead, both as magicians going back and forth with their mind games and manipulations. The cast also included the always wonderful Michael Caine, the beautiful Scarlett Johansson, the excellent Rebecca Hall, rocker David Bowie as Tesla, Tesla’s assistant Andy Serkis, as well as Daniel Davis, Roger Rees, Jim Piddock, Ricky Jay, W. Morgan Sheppard and Samantha Mahurin.

The story had about as many twists as one would expect when dealing with magicians. It was a film that required you to pay attention as it was told in a non-linear way and it blended together masterfully. One of the strengths of Christopher Nolan is the structure of the story being told. Everything works very well together and looking at it as a whole, the structure kept the audience guessing about what was happening.

The film had a great look and some excellent costumes, fitting right in at the end of the 19th century. The film did receive Academy Award nominations for Best Cinematography and Best Art Direction.

The science fiction aspect of The Prestige came into being thanks to the use of real life scientist/inventor Nikola Tesla, played spot on by David Bowie. The technology used in the film was not possible (at least at this time) and was a huge risk for the film. It took this chance in a basically realistic story and it could have messed it all up. For example, I had been enjoying Interstellar until the third act where the flip ruined it all for me. This surprise in The Prestige did not throw me off course and I think fit nicely in with the magic.

This film moves up to around the top of my personal Nolan film favorite list. It was well acted and kept the audience guessing with what was going on with an original style of storytelling.

Day: January 7th, Movie: 7

Steven Spielberg directed a movie that had been handed him by Stanley Kubrick, who had owned the rights for a few years, but was unable to get the film produced. After Kubrick’s death, Spielberg was finally able to direct A.I. Artificial Intelligence.

Starring Haley Joel Osment, fresh off his Academy Award nominated performance in The Sixth Sense, A.I. Artificial Intelligence was filled with some beautiful imagery and amazing shots. The special effects of the movie were amazing, providing the setting/background for Haley Joel Osment to do this work.

Osment brought an excellent performance as David, a robot created as a young boy who could feel love- something that was not done before. As a trial run, David was given to a husband and wife whose son was in a terrible accident and had been comatose for five years. Monica (Frances O’Connor) and Henry (Sam Robards) were uncertain about David, but eventually, Monica came to accept the young Mecha. She imprinted herself on David, a process that she was warned could not be broken and, if something bad would happen, would require David to be returned and destroyed.

After the imprinting, Henry came to his wife with the news that their injured son, Martin (Jake Thomas) had awoken and was coming home. Martin began to feel jealousy over David and started plotting against him. In the end, after David unintentionally nearly drowns Martin, Monica knew that David could not stay with them. However, she could not take him back to be destroyed wither, so instead, she took him and dropped David in the woods, deserting him.

David went on a quest in an attempt to find The Blue Fairy, from his favorite movie Pinocchio, trying to be made into a real boy.

I did not like much of the beginning of this movie. I found Monica to be a terrible mother and Henry did not even try to bond with David. Dumping him in the woods like a stray dog was such a cowardly thing to do, I had a real hard time hoping that David could get his wish and find his way back to Monica as a real boy. I also did not find Frances O’Connor’s performance to be very well done. I did not believe much of anything she did early in the movie and she seemed to be obviously acting. I did not enjoy her performance much.

When David met up with Jude Law, who played Joe, a gigolo robot whose job was to please women, the film took a turn into the world of creepiness. I felt a little uncomfortable with the material that Haley Joel Osment was acting around and, though Jude Law was charming in this role, he felt like nothing more than a suave Scarecrow (from the Wizard of Oz). I am not sure what his purpose was outside of just getting David where he needed to go and to creep me out.

The ending 20-30 minutes felt added on, though apparently it was not. None of the ending of the film felt earned and did not have much of any narrative structure to the film.

While it did have its moments, I was disappointed overall with A.I. Artificial Intelligence. It had plenty of themes, but none of them seemed to be developed over the course of the film. Haley Joel Osment was excellent again and the look of the film was lovely, but after that, I did not like the story, the other characters or the finale. It was a true disappointment.

Day: January 6th, Movie: 6

Today’s Genre-ary Sci-Fi DailyView film is a black and white classic from 1954, a monster movie with giant ants called Them!.

According to IMDB, “In the New Mexico desert, Police Sgt. Ben Peterson (James Whitmore) and his partner find a child wandering in the desert and soon they discover that giant ants are attacking the locals. FBI agent Robert Graham (James Arness) teams up with Ben and with the support of Dr. Harold Medford (Edmund Gwenn) and his daughter Dr. Patricia ‘Pat’ Medford (Joan Weldon), they destroy the colony of ants in the middle of the desert. Dr. Harold Medford explains that the atomic testing in 1945 developed the dangerous mutant ants. But they also discover that two queen ants have flown away to Los Angeles and they are starting a huge colony in the underground flood control tunnels of that city. When a mother reports that her two children are missing, the team begin searching for them. Will they arrive in time to save the children and destroy the colony?“

The film surprised me because it did a really good job of keeping the ants hidden through the film. It was the 1950s and the special effects are spotty, but they do a great job of maintaining the mysteriousness. The moments that they use the ants are kept minimal and it maximizes the opportunity.

Meanwhile, it does a solid job of providing us with a group of characters to root for as they are chasing the monstrous ants. James Arness gives a great performance and is one of the better characters to watch. I also enjoyed the scientist Harold Medford who had so much knowledge of ants (including a film detailing all the facts about ants). Edmund Gwenn went from playing Santa Claus in Miracle on 34th Street to the world’s most knowledgeable ant guy.

The story was very relevant for the time as it helped kick off the atomic monster films. It had been under a decade since the atomic bomb was dropped on Japan and the idea of what the a-bomb could do was front and center in the minds of the public. Causing a group of ants to mutate seemed very realistic and created an anxiety. The response of the film’s characters made a lot of sense too.

There were a few scenes that I felt that I needed that were not included in the film. The ending needed something for me and there was a reunion scene with the kids and their mother that was missing in my opinion. Still, the film worked well and I really thought it was more than I thought it would be.

Day: January 5th, Movie: 5

A 2-hour delay for school today opened up an opportunity to complete the Genre-ary Sci-Fi DailyView right away this morning. I am heading to see Megan tonight so I had scheduled a short to watch and, thanks to HBO Max, I was able to watch the original sci-fi short, Georges Méliès’s groundbreaking film, A Trip to the Moon.

This is the oldest movie on the site, being listed at 1902. A Trip to the Moon is an influential film by the French filmmaker and is widely considered the first science fiction movie. The version I saw on HBO Max had some color added to it. I do not know if that color was added recently or if it was from the original. According to Wikipedia, color prints “were produced for a small percent of Méliès’s films and advertised alongside the black-and-white versions at a higher price.” This make me suspect that this version on HBO Max could be one of these.

The film is an amazing achievement by Georges Méliès as the 14-minute film included a narrative structure, despite not having any dialogue or any word screens as many silent films would use. Some of the effects were very creative for the time and Méliès effectively used several camera techniques to create the illusion of what he wanted to happen. I can only imagine the stir that this film and its originality and its subject matter caused.

Inspired by Jules Verne and H.G. Wells among others, Georges Méliès brought the idea of science fiction to the movie world. He included a score over the film and, apparently, there were times when a narrator spoke over the film, explaining what was happening. Georges Méliès starred in the film as Professor Barbenfouillis, the president of the Astronomy Club and your main character.

The imagery of the cannon-powered rocket ship embedded in the “face” of the moon is an iconic image that has been used many times. My first memory of the image and reference to this film came from Martin Scorsese’s 2011 film Hugo. A Trip to the Moon brought a sensation to the film industry, which was just starting out, proving that you could tell a story and involve the audience in a piece of entertainment. The film helped show that anything was possible and the only limitations was the imagination.

Day: January 4, Movie: 4

The fourth film in the Genre-ary Sci-Fi DailyView is the 2011 British film, Attack the Block.

I started off this movie disliking what the film was giving me. We met the street gang led by Moses (John Boyega) as they were mugging an innocent woman, Sam (Jodie Whittaker). The five kids seemed to be nothing more than a group of punks and I found myself wondering if these characters are meant to the protagonists. Moses seemed to be a horrendously cruel punk who was not easy to like.

Then Moses killed an alien and things went off the charts. The death of the alien drew an invading force of larger, meaner creatures that appeared to be on a path of vengeance.

Suddenly, the character of Moses took a turn and started to realize how much of what is happening was his fault and, when he had to come into connection with Sam once again after mugging her, Moses is taken on a definite journey as a character. By the end, I had a much better mindset about Moses, even liking the character.

I especially enjoyed the gang member Pest (Alex Esmail), who felt like the audience’s voice as the film moved along. He was funny and quite witty. I also enjoyed the dialogue from Pest and the other kids because half of the British slang that was used was nearly undeterminable. I did not know what he was saying a lot of the time. It was funny.

I was surprised that this sci-fi/comedy/horror film’s biggest draw for me was how well the characters developed and interacted with one another. The action was good and the creature design was solid, using what was clearly mostly practical effects. In a film that I initially thought that I was going to dislike because I did not like the characters, I ended up liking this a lot.

Day: January 3rd, Movie: 3

Today’s entry in the Genre-ary Sci-Fi DailyView is the classic Anime animated film, Akira from 1988. This animated movie was adapted from a manga of the same title.

Right off the bat, I want to say that I watched the English dubbed version of this. Usually in live action, I try to watch the English subtitled version instead of the dubbed, but I did not think that the animated film would matter much. However, I was wrong. The dialogue and the voice acting of the English dub was poor and it took a lot of my concentration to focus in on the film with the distractions. If I had it to do it again, I would go with the Japanese voice/English subtitles version.

But I did not choose that one and so my opinion on the film is tainted a touch.

According to Rotten Tomatoes, “In 1988 the Japanese government drops an atomic bomb on Tokyo after ESP experiments on children go awry. In 2019, 31 years after nuking the city, Kaneda, a bike gang leader, tries to save his friend Tetsuo from a secret government project. He battles against anti-government activists, greedy politicians, irresponsible scientists and a powerful military leader until Tetsuo’s supernatural power suddenly manifest.”

The animation was amazingly cool for the year. It may not be up to the quality of animation today, but there was a special quality to it that made it work very well with this story. It definitely had that Anime feel to it and you can tell how this inspired all kinds of Anime films that followed it.

I had a little trouble getting into the story at first, but as the story progressed, I became more interested in what the movie was trying to show. There were some high concepts in the story and some impressive science fiction themes.

I enjoyed this movie, but I would be lying if I said that the dialogue and the English voice acting did not affect my overall feelings of this version. I still like this, but I would have liked to have seen the film the way it was meant to be seen.

Day: January 2nd, Movie: 2

The second day of the Genre-ary Sci-Fi DailyView is underway with a cool sci-fi flick that I had never seen before, starring some big named actors. It was a neo noir film called Dark City and it featured Kiefer Sutherland and William Hurt.

However, the lead star was an actor named Rufus Sewell, who I did not know very well. Checking out his filmography at IMDB, I saw that he had been in several films that I had seen (as well as several TV shows that I had not), but none of them stood out as the “Oh yeah, I saw him in that” memory.

Dark City has a complicated story that grabbed me right away. I was engaged with the central mystery of what was happening and wanted to know the answers. Directed by Alex Proyas (which is a follow up to The Crow), the film is extremely stylish and truly surprising.

According to IMDB, “John Murdoch (Rufus Sewell) awakens alone in a strange hotel to find that he has lost his memory and is wanted for a series of brutal and bizarre murders. While trying to piece together his past, he stumbles upon a fiendish underworld controlled by a group of beings known as The Strangers who possess the ability to put people to sleep and alter the city and its inhabitants. Now Murdoch must find a way to stop them before they take control of his mind and destroy him“

The film gave me some The Matrix feeling about it, and then I realized that this film came out in 1998 whereas The Matrix came out in 1999. So perhaps The Matrix gave me some Dark City vibes instead.

Kiefer Sutherland gave an interesting performance as Dr. Daniel Schreber. He gave the character several intriguing traits, such as a breathy way of speaking and physical limps that you do not normally see from a Kiefer Sutherland role. Where he falls in the story is one of the key mysteries of the film.

I believe there was too much use of exposition, especially at the very beginning of the film which feels unnecessary. I understand the need for an explanation as you go, but some of the information they presented in the film was shown rather sufficiently using the imagery.

I will say that when the big revel came around, I was surprised. I was impressed by the reveal and, even more so, since the film had been dropping hints throughout about what was going on. I am sure that upon a second watch, you could pick up plenty of clues that would make more sense with the knowledge of what was happening.

Dark City was a well design science fiction tale with some fascinating ideas. The Strangers were creepy and menacing. The film’s look was exceptional with some definite dark tones and creative images. I am not sure how I feel about the third act confrontation (which I will not spoil), but everything else was so strong that I am happy to put aside any minor gripes.