Lego Movie 2: The Second Part

Image result for lego movie 2 movie poster

The Lego Movie was quite a surprise because I never thought that a film about Legos would work.  However, it was amazingly funny and had a huge heart.  You knew that this would lead to a sequel.  So after a Lego Batman and a Lego Ninjago films, we got a sequel.  Unfortunately, it cannot match the first film.

I got a chance today to catch an early screening of The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part (why not the Second Piece?) at Cinemark which was cool.

There were many good things about The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part, but there were more negatives here than the first one.  I was worried about that since I was not a fan of the trailer they dropped for this sequel.  Still, I liked the movie overall.

Things have gone poorly for the Lego world, as there appeared to be a dark and sad apocalyptic world.  The people of the word worried about an invasion of aliens, who had been arriving and causing all kinds of destruction.

When the aliens come back and kidnapped Lucy (Elizabeth Banks) and Batman (Will Arnett) along with three others, Emmet (Chris Pratt) built a ship and followed them into space.

The voice acting was great and the film had some really wonderfully clever dialogue.  It was funny and the CGI was solid.  There were some really great parts of the movie.  It was a good watch.  I enjoyed just about every song and I liked the meta jokes that were sprinkled throughout the film.

However, there were several problems that I could not get avoid.  First, though the film is clever, it may not actually be as clever as it thinks it is.  Second, the film was predictable.  In particular, any part SPOILER that was involving the “ourmomageddon” was so obvious that it caused eye rolls.

Then, the biggest issue I had with the film was any part that involved the kids in the real world who were playing with the Legos.  It took me out of the film every time.  It felt forced.  As if they knew the reveal in the first film was an amazingly emotional reveal and made that film special so it was going to work again and this time they would use it more.  The problem was that did not work again.  It was too much.

I mentioned the music and I thought it was great.  At first, I thought the music was going to be overused as well, but I found myself jamming along with each song.  There were some extremely catchy songs.

I love Lego Batman.  He is perfectly presented and is one of the most consistently funny aspects of these films.

So, while I had some disappointments with this movie, I did enjoy seeing it and I really believe that the creators took a big swing at doing something great.  Unfortunately, they came up short of great and fell into good instead.

3.1 stars

The Kid Who Would Be King

Image result for the kid who would be king

I was not a fan of the promotional material for this movie.  I was not looking forward to it.  However, this is another example of the promotional material (specifically the trailer) not doing a film a favor.  I truly enjoyed this movie.

The Kid Who Would Be King was considerably better than I thought it would be.

Alex (Louis Ashbourne Serkis) was your typical kid, bullied and put upon, living with his mother and not knowing anything about his father.  After standing up for his friend Bedders (Dean Chaumoo) against two of the baddest school bullies, Lance (Tom Taylor) and Kaye (Rhianna Dorris), Alex was chased into a construction site.  After escaping from the bullies, Alex discovered a sword stuck in a stone.  He pulled the sword out and started everything happening.

Little did he expect that this sword was the actual Excalibur of King Arthur and that Morgana (Rebecca Ferguson) was preparing to return to take over Britain.  Merlin (Angus Imrie/Patrick Stewart) arrived to try and mentor the young Alex in what he needed to do to prevent Morgana from returning.

This movie was considerably more emotionally poignant than I ever thought it would be.  It seemed as if it were going to be a childish action film that you would need to be 12 to enjoy.  However, there was much more heft to the film than expected.  The characters were real and had real arcs.  The story had some great beats to it and I liked the way it developed.

Now, I tell you, that the finale was a bit too much for my taste… stretching credibility too much, bu tit did not ruin what had come before it or what would come after.

The kids were all solid and did a great job acting.  It was awesome to see Patrick Stewart once again too.  This was one of the best versions of King Arthur’s legends in quite a while.  There was a magic to the movie.  It reminded me a bit of Harry Potter.  It was not quite that level, but it was very enjoyable.

4.25 stars

Stan & Ollie (2018)

Image result for stan and Ollie movie poster

When I was a young geek, I used to love the old time comedy teams.  I loved Abbott and Costello, The Marx Brothers, The Three Stooges (to a lesser extent) and the tandem of Laurel and Hardy.  These comedians made me laugh and when I saw that we were getting a biopic of the life of Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy, I was excited.

Then, I saw Holmes and Watson and it tempered my excitement for the performance of John C. Reilly as Oliver Hardy, because he was so bad as John Watson.  However, I knew John C. Reilly was better than what I had seen in that travesty, so I kept my fingers crossed.

John C. Reilly was absolutely amazing as Oliver Hardy in this film, putting any doubts I may have had to rest.  Both Reilly and Steve Coogan, who was Stan Laurel, perfectly embodied the two comedic greats (and EYG Hall of Famers).

The relationship between Stan and Ollie was at the center of the film, and it showed that the relationship had a few cracks in it.  The film focused on a time near the end of their careers when Laurel and Hardy toured Great Britain.  The film dove into a time in the past when Hardy had done a film with a different partner because Laurel had been fired and Hardy was still under contract.  That “betrayal” seemed to stick with Stan and colored some of his thoughts about his partner.

It also showed Stan Laurel as the driving force behind the comedy of the pair, while Hardy listened to the suggestions and put it into effect.

The charm of both lead actors really carry this movie.  They do an amazing job of becoming Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy and their performances were spot on. It had to be effective or else this movie would not have worked at all.  The recreation of the stage show was wonderful and, especially the two doors bit, was just awesomely funny.

There were a couple of songs in the film that were sung mainly by John C. Reilly that were beautifully rendered.  And the final performance of the well-known dance was suspenseful and dramatic.

The arrival of Stan and Ollie’s wives, played by Shirley Henderson and Nina Arianda, brought another level to the relationship and showed the world what it must have been like to be married to showmen like these men.  Both actresses brought a new energy to the screen when they were there.

Sure, Stan & Ollie may not have been as deep of a biopic as you could get, but the film was an enjoyable experience and was delightful.  I enjoyed the entire movie.

4.2 stars

The Wife (2018)

Image result for the wife movie poster

I went to iTunes this morning so I could see the film from 2018 called The Wife.  It was another one of the movies that did not come around here (or if it did, I may have missed it).  Honestly, I would not have searched this film out if Glenn Close had not been nominated for an Oscar (and won a Golden Globe) for this performance.  I like to see the main award films and The Wife was clearly one to see.

After seeing it, I can understand why Glenn Close may be the favorite to win in the Best Actress category, but, to be honest, I did not love the movie.

I mean, it was fine.  I am giving it a fresh review, but I would never watch it again.  The strong performance from Close is what elevated this into consideration.

Joe Castleman (Jonathan Pryce) is an acclaimed author and up for a Nobel Prize for Literature.  And behind the great man is an even greater woman, Joan Castleman (Glenn Close) who has spent years sacrificing her own desires and dreams to support and encourage Joe’s success.

I thought Jonathan Pryce was excellent here as well, so there were two very strong performances, but the story was okay.  It did not grab me the way that I thought it might.  The film felt like another movie that I had seen this past year and I had trouble getting past that.

Christian Slater was there too.  He was playing a jerk who was writing a book an Joe and he was searching for a scoop.

The film showed us the life of this couple from their early days in flashbacks while they prepared to accept the Nobel Prize.  This story telling choice was fine, but it suffered whenever Close (or Pryce, to be fair) was not on screen.

I have seen this story before and the only reason this is memorable at all is because of Glenn Close and Jonathan Pryce.  If you want to see a master class of acting skills, watch Glenn Close’s performance. she is tremendous.  Otherwise, The Wife is average.

3 stars

Wait Until Dark (1967)

Image result for wait until dark

Holy crap.

Okay, I was watching the live edition of Movie Fights tonight and they were having a Movie fights Championship match between the challenger Greg Alba of the Reel Rejects and the reigning, defending Movie Fights Champion, Dan Murrell.  It was a great episode with two extremely spirited debaters.  One of the questions was “Most Underrated Movie of All-Time.”  I mean… how do you answer something like that?  Well, Dan Murrell mentioned a movie entitled Wait Until Dark, starring Audrey Hepburn, Alan Arkin, and Richard Crenna, and he made it sound really interesting.

So, after the Movie Fights was over (No Spoilers), I went to YouTube and rented a copy of the movie.  And…holy crap, did I love this movie.

Seriously, it was one of the best films I have seen in a long while.  I can’t believe that I hadn’t heard of it before tonight.

Audrey Hepburn, who was nominated for an Oscar for this film, played Susy Hendrix, a woman recently blinded who was trying to cope with her blindness.  Her husband, played by Efrem Zimbalist, Jr, wound up unwittingly with a doll that contained something that the psychotic killer, Roat (Alan Arkin), wanted back.  Roat enlisted a pair of criminals, Mike (Richard Crenna) and Carlino (Jack Weston), to help him reclaim this doll.  It meant trying to fool the blind woman in a complex and intricate manner.

This film is as tense and nerve-wracking as you are going to find.  I was on the edge of my seat through the entire film, and the finale was as great of a scene as you are going to find.

Susy Hendrix was nobody’s victim.  Despite her supposed weakness with her blindness, Susy was smart, quick-witted, brave, and yet vulnerable.  She was the most heroic of characters and I loved her completely.  The performance of Audrey Hepburn was off the charts and certainly deserved the Oscar nomination that it earned her.  She could have easily been shown as the victim of this movie, but she was able to see through the criminals’ lies and manipulations through her own brand of intelligence and resourcefulness.  I did not expect to see a female character this strong in a 1960s movie, but there she was.

Alan Arkin was unbelievably good as the evil Roat.  He was as compellingly wicked and menacing as could be.  Arkin was so great here that I had no idea what was going to happen and I was holding my breath as I hoped that Susy could make it through this problem.  Arkin was involved in a jump scare in this movie that scared the living crap out of me.  I literally yelled at the screen when it happened.  Dan Murrell had mentioned it in his argument on Movie Fights Live, but it still did not prepare me for how effective that jump scare was and how much I was actually shaken from it.

As a horror/thriller movie, this was fantastic.  The tension built throughout the film until the final moments, which was as amazing as you are ever going to see.  There may be a few plot holes here and there, but it is a 50+ year old film and it feels as relevant today as ever.  There are moments and scenes here that are obviously influential to other films of this genre moving forward.

Based on a 1966 play of the same name by Frederick Knott, Wait Until Dark has basically one set and all the drama and action takes place in this location.  Even though the below ground apartment is the only location, this film never felt boring or as if it needed more than what was there.  It felt like more than just a play on film (like Fences, a film starring Denzel Washington and Viola Davis did).  It created superior suspense and kept me riveted the entire time.

Thanks for the recommendation, Dan.

paragon

Image result for wait until dark

I Know What You Did Last Summer (1997)

Related image

The last of the Second Chance/First Impression Binge this weekend before the football game is from the creators of Scream.  I Know What You Did Las Summer takes the tropes of the slasher movie and the kids in jeopardy and makes a movie that I saw once and did not remember much about.

I knew that Buffy the Vampire Slayer was in it (aka Sarah Michelle Geller) and her future husband Freddie Prinze, Jr.  I found it hard to see Sarah running from this fisherman with a hook character as I kept wanting her to turn to him as Buffy and kick his ass.  Unfortunately, that was not to be.

Four kids, out for a summer night of drinking and sex on the beach, wind up running down a man on their way home.  Instead of calling the police, they decide to dispose of the body and pretend like it never happened.

Of course, that kind of secret has a way of coming back, but not usually in the form of a psychotic fisherman looking for revenge.

There are some big old plot holes in the story and the fisherman sure seemed to be able to be anywhere in a flash of a second.  Plus, Barry (Ryan Phillippe), the football kid and boyfriend of Buffy, was a real dick.  As an entitled rich kid, you almost did not mind the fisherman chopping him up for chum.

The film is pretty fun at times watching these four pretty people suffer for their crime while hoping that, at least some of them, make it out alive.  It overcome most of the problems to give us a poor man’s Scream.

The biggest issue I had was “how did the killer get around, get those bodies out of there so quickly and efficiently, and still be in the right place at the right time?”  It was a major distraction and made the killer seem supernatural even though, spoilers, he wasn’t.

Still, it is not the worst film I have seen in the genre and it provided some dumb fun.

tweener

Related image

Perfect Bid:The Contestant Who Knew Too Much (2018)

Image result for perfect bid movie poster

This one is a bit of a palate cleanser.

I needed one after the first four movies in the Second Chance/First Impression Binge this weekend.  The Land of the Lost nearly broke me.  So I found this documentary on Amazon Prime from last year called Perfect Bid: The Contestant That Knew Too Much which focused on the man (or perhaps the man behind the man) who made a perfect, to the dollar, bid on The Price is Right.

Theodore Slauson was a teacher and he was a fan of the television game show The Price is Right.  So much so he started plotting out the prices of prizes shown on the show so that he would know how much something would cost.  It gave him a distinct advantage if he were ever to get on the stage.

He attended multiple tapings and, since the crowd is encouraged to yell out prices to help contestants, Theodore would become a bit of a known commodity.

Ironically, when Theodore made it to the stage himself, the Wheel round knocked him out of contention.

It wasn’t until years later that Theodore returned to help Terry Kniess, the contestant who bid the exact amount on the show’s Showcase Showdown.  Kniess has never admitted that he had any sort of help from Theodore for the bid.

However, most of the documentary focuses on Theodore and his years in the audience of the show.  We get interviews with Bob Barker, long time show producer Roger Dobkowitz, Drew Carey and others to help punctuate the moment, but the scandal of the perfect bid is really not the main aspect of the film.

In fact, it is downplayed as a scandal at all.  It just indicates that Theodore is excellent at his homework on the show, going as far as to show his chart of prize costs.  There is a bunch of clips from the game show revealing Theodore yelling out exact price numbers to other contestants.

This documentary is fine, but it does not feel to have much weight to it.  To define the perfect bid itself as a scandal is stretching somewhat.  It was an enjoyable watch, and I am grateful for the cleansing of the palate that I needed for the other bad films that I have been binging this weekend.

funtime

Image result for perfect bid movie poster

Land of the Lost (2009)

Image result for land of the lost movie poster

The Second Chance/First Impression Binge continue this morning with an adaptation of a late 1970s, early 1980s kid show from Sid and Marty Krofft called Land of the Lost.  The film starred Will Farrell.

I have seen parts of the film before and did not like it at all, so second chance certainly fits here.  I watched the Land of the Lost TV show as a youth and always enjoyed it.  Then, when it came out on DVD, I purchased the entire series as a lark.  It was nostalgia, but I discovered something surprising.  The TV series was way better than I remembered.  In fact, I would go on and say that Land of the Lost was one of the best science fiction series of all time, certainly ahead of its time.  Of course, the biggest issue it faced was the budget and having dinosaurs and other such looked cheap.  That lack of ability to create the proper look caused Land of the Lost to not be taken as seriously as it could have been.  However, go back and watch the show for the stories, they are outstanding.

Unfortunately, whoever made the movie did not have the same love of the show as I did because they made a travesty, taking some of the best parts of the show and warping it into something unrecognizable and downright insulting.

I am not a Will Farrell fan, but the first five minutes or so of the movie gave me some hope.  I enjoyed the weird interaction with Matt Lauer and saw potential in the way they were setting up the story.  Then, Will Farrell and his idiotic comedy took over and the film took a nose dive into T-Rex poop.

Anna Friel played Holly and Danny McBride played Will, taking both of those characters in a completely different direction than the show.  There was no connection between them and Rick Marshall (Farrell). The way they entered the Land of the Lost was silly and everything afterwards was inconsistent and just a waste of a great concept.

The movie lost the heart that the series had and never found anything even close to it.  It took the characters and settings of the show and warped them into an unrecognizable mess that was simple a name of a character.

This is the third out of four movies during this binge that is terrible and I may be rethinking the theme of Second Chance/First Impression Binge.

stale

Image result for land of the lost movie poster

On the Basis of Sex (2018)

Image result for on the basis of sex movie poster

Here is another of those limited 2018 release movies that I don’t get a chance to see until 2019.  This one is a biopic on the life, in particular a section of the life, of current Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg.

I must say that, while I enjoyed this movie, it was not as enjoyable for me as RBG, the documentary about Ruth Bader Ginsberg from last year.  Fact is though that I learned more about RBG last year and it contributed to my watching of this movie.

Film kicks off with Ruth at Harvard, one of the few women in her class, and dealing with the expectations of being a woman in society at the time.  The film rapidly progressed through this period to a landmark case of sexual discrimination that Ginsberg took on where a male was being discriminated against as a caretaker by tax code.  Ginsberg used this case to help propel her fights to battle against discrimination against women.

Felicity Jones was great as Ruth Bader Ginsberg and Armie Hammer was the perfect support for her as Ruth’s husband Martin.  One of those facts that RBG the documentary told me was that Martin was always a supporter of and an advocate for his wife and Armie Hammer showed that beautifully.

The film itself does feel fairly formulaic and typical for a biopic, but the strength of the story and the main performances really bring more to the film.

I thought the relationship shown us between Ruth and her daughter Jane (Cailee Spaeny) were some of the strongest scenes in the movie.  There was one scene in particular in the rain that I thought really brought some wonderful moments to the movie.

Unfortunately, some of the best parts of the third act court case were shown in the trailer instead of being saved for the film, which irritates me.

Kathy Bates was great here in a small role as famous lawyer Dorothy Kenyan.  Every scene Bates was in was worth the time.

On the whole, this was a fine movie, but it was not the grand slam that it could have been.  The typical beats of a biopic were hit and that minimized the emotional wallop at the end of the picture.  Last year’s documentary was much better and more impactful for me, but On the Basis of Sex was still a good watch.

3.5 stars

Glass

Related image

There were a lot of critics who did not like or downright hated the third movie in the “Unbreakable” universe, Glass.  And I do not understand why because I thought this was awesome.

After Split revealed David Dunn (Bruce Willis) was in their shared universe, people became very excited about the final installment as did I.

Dr. Ellie Staple (Sarah Paulson) is studying those people who have a delusion that they are super heroes and she has come to the psychological institution where Elijah Price (Sam Jackson) is being held in an attempt to “cure” him.  After a confrontation between David Dunn, “The Overseer” (Bruce Willis) and The Horde (James McAvoy), they end up in her care as well at the same psych ward.  It soon becomes apparent that Elijah, aka Mr. Glass, has other plans.

It is difficult to talk too much about what happens in Glass without spoiling it, so I am going to do my best.  Let’s start with the great performance given by James McAvoy once again.  His creation of the multiple personalities of this character is such strong work that he is dominant in most every scene he is in.

The film starts with a great action sequence between David Dunn and the Horde and had me completely engaged.  I enjoyed the Bruce Willis work here more than most Bruce Willis performances recently.  I think that goes with the idea that the character of David Dunn is very much laid back as Bruce Willis is.

The middle of the film does drag a bit, as all three of the main characters are at the mental institution, however, as the film heads to the third act, it takes off big time and I loved the ending.

I do not think the film goes where people expect it to go and that might be why some people have not liked it.  I actually thought that was part of the film’s real strength.  It took your typical comic book movie and subverted expectations and norms, even while calling your attention to the fact that it understands the comic book norms that it is subverting.

Some people claimed that Samuel L. Jackson is not in the movie enough and that since it is called Glass, that is a problem.  I never thought that for one minute.  I guess I felt the idea and presence of Mr. Glass throughout the film and I did not need to have Sam Jackson on screen constantly for that to happen.

It is now mid-January and I have disagreed with the critics on two wide release movies (the other being The Upside).  I wonder if this is a trend for 2019?  I loved Glass and thought it was a fantastic film that took Unbreakable and Split and wrapped up the story in an entertaining and intelligent way.

4 stars 

Mars Attacks! (1996)

Image result for mars attacks movie poster

Well, the snow has ended.

So the Winter Storm part of the weekend binge-a-thon is done too.  Now, we are just down to the Second Chance/First Impression Binge and this is the first second chance we have to offer.

Mars Attacks! was a comedy alien invasion spoof film from the mind of Tim Burton that came during the mid 90s and I disliked it quite a bit the first and only time that I saw it on VHS.  Finding it now on Amazon Prime, I decided that this would be the next installment in the binge.

And I did find it more entertaining than I did on the first viewing.

There are a ton of actors appearing in here and most of the big names do not last for too long.  There are a bunch of storylines that really make little to no sense.  It is just a fun movie where a bunch of little green jerks from Mars came to the planet earth and tried to take it over.

Jack Nicholson was the President of the United States (and a weird second role of a Vegas businessman that really had no reason).  Glenn Close was the vapid FLOTUS.  A group of actors (Michael J. Fox, Pierce Brosnan, Danny DeVito, Martin Short, Sarah Jessica Parker, Jack Black) are here basically to see how the Martians kill them.

The main heroes of the piece is Jim Brown, Tom Jones (playing himself), Lukas Haas and Sylvia Sidney.  Not exactly the group of names when matched up with the other actors in this movie.

That was probably the idea here and Mars Attacks! made these deaths funny a lot of the time.  The Martians themselves were fairly ridiculous too.

Certainly, one of the standout performances was Lisa Marie as “Martian Girl” who is able to infiltrate the White House with horny chief of staff Martin Short.  Her weird way of moving created the most memorable of all the characters involved.

While this is nothing unbelievable, I found it more entertaining this time around and the first film of this binge that is going to receive a positive review.  One out of three so far.

Getting out this afternoon for Glass.  Binge will continue later this weekend.

tweener

Image result for mars attacks movie poster

Terminator Salvation (2009)

Image result for Terminator salvation movie poster

Well, the snow is still falling.

And I am 0-2.

The Second Chance/First Impression Winter Storm Binge continued with Terminator Salvation.  A 2009 movie that I had never seen and has been called the worst film of the Terminator franchise.

Unfortunately, that may not be too far from the truth.

This was so boring.  It seemed that all this movie had was explosions, machine gunfire, another explosion, and surprisingly poor CGI.

Oh, and a weird voice from Christian Bale.

There was a great cast starting with Bale and following with Sam Worthington, Helena Bonham Carter, Anton Yelchin, Common, and Bryce Dallas Howard.  Yet, it felt like the film was full of people who could not act at all.

The film was dark, literally, and that made it difficult to watch.  It was hard to tell many times exactly what was going on in many of the action scenes.  The film wanted me to connect with the human characters, but I did not.

This is the last film before I go to bed tonight and hopefully two things will happen.  One, the Winter Storm will be over when I start the next film and two, maybe I will find a film that I do not dislike so much.  Maybe it is time to search for a second chance film.

stale

Image result for Terminator salvation movie poster

Cool poster though….

The Happening (2008)

Related image

We are currently in a snow storm which should be going for at least tomorrow some time.  So I decided that this would be a good time to do another of the EYG Binge-a-thons.  I have been planning the next binge.  This time, the concept is Second Chance/First Impression Winter Storm Binge.  The idea is that I am going to choose from two types of films.  Either films that I saw once before and did not like or movies that I have not seen because I have heard others say negative things.

I mean, the only time I ever watched Se7en was in the theater and I did not like it much, but when I rewatched it last year, I found it much better. The same could be said for Sicario.  You never know how your opinions or tastes may change over the years.

I started compiling possible lists when I came across this movie.  With Glass coming out this weekend (and me yet having to see it, despite some negative reviews I have heard), I thought this would be the perfect film with which to kick off the Second Chance/First Impression Winter Storm Binge.  M. Night Shyamalan’s notoriously bad movie starring Mark Wahlberg and Zooey Deschanel called The Happening.

“What? Noooooooooooo”

I just saw some discussion of this on Movie Fights Live this past Thursday, where they had a whole Shyamalan-themed episode.  It also shares a lot of ideas with the recent Netflix hit Bird Box.  What better to do for a First Impression (as I have never seen this).

My first impression… this is crap.

I was not angry watching this like I was during Movie 43 or Holmes and Watson.  This was more like watching Birdemic: Shock and Terror or Manos: Hands of Fate.  You know that at some point, the RiffTrax Live guys will get there hands on this and it will be hilarious.  Heck, there were parts of this movie that were damn funny as it was (even though that was not what was intended).

Mark Wahlberg has had some bad movies before (Transformers: The Last Knight, Planet of the Apes, Collateral) but this one is right near the top of stinkers.  He is terrible as a science teacher named Elliot Moore.  He seemed void of any real emotional reactions and his acting is wooden as can be.

Yes, the trees and the wind were trying to kill them, and, after watching the film and their acting, how could you honestly blame them.

The dialogue was ridiculous.  The story was horrendous.  There was no sense being made and M. Night tried to bash you over the head with a message.

I laughed more here than anything else.  There were no tension or scares.  I can’t imagine why they made some of the choices that they made.

This one did not get the Second Chance/First Impression Winter Storm Binge off to a good start.  I hope I can find some diamonds in the rough during this binge or I might have to move over to the Punisher.

*Please let Glass be better than this*

putrescent

 

Related image

The Death of Superman (2018)/Reign of the Supermen (2019)

The Death of Superman + Reign of the Supermen Double Feature

Fathom Events today provided two DC Animated movies that showed that it is possible to make a compelling and interesting film focusing on Superman.

The Death of Superman was a direct-to-DVD from last year and told the story from the iconic DC Comics comic book from 1993, Superman #75.  This was one of the comics that Batman v. Superman took and crammed together for their story arc.  This is evidence proving that the choice to rush through the storyline in the live action films was a huge mistake.  At the end of the animated version, when Superman sacrificed his life to save Lois Lane from the rampaging Doomsday, I was feeling the emotions.  There were some tears in my eyes whereas I felt nothing during the whole BvS mess.

They followed this up with a new release of Reign of the Supermen, which continued the storyline from the comics where a group of “new” Supermen (a clone Superboy, The Eradicator, Steel and Cyborg Superman) stepped forward in the absence of Kal-El to stand in his stead.

Quick takes on these two animated films.  I thought The Death of Superman was fantastic from start to finish.  Loved just about everything about it.  Reign of the Supermen dragged a bit for me at the start, but the last half of the film was just excellent.

Once again, as I stated with my review of Justice League: Gods and Monsters, maybe it is time that Warner Brothers divvy up some cash so these DC Animated movies can get some better animation.  There is no doubt that the animation on these films are below average, if not downright cheap looking and that is a damn shame because the storytelling is top-notch.  WB should take some of that Aquaman moolah and see if they couldn’t come up with the next Spider-man: Into the Spider-verse-style film using the wealth of wonderful characters that DC has.

Back to the double feature, I found the pay off to be strongly done once again.  Not only did we get the best representation of Superman we have gotten since Christopher Reeve (or maybe Superman: The Animated Series), but we got the Justice League cameos as well.  Both Flash (Christopher Gorham) and Green Lantern (Nathan Fillion) stole the show.  Rosario Dawson’s Wonder Woman was another highlight.

The voice cast was solid.  Jerry O’Connell as Superman.  Rebecca Romojn as Lois Lane.  Rainn Wilson as Lex Luthor.  All three stood out as great castings.

Being able to watch the two films together in one event was an awesome treat and it really helped the second film.  I feel that if it hadn’t had that strong intro, the relatively weaker beginning of the second film would have stood out more.  As it is, it just felt like a slower bit necessary in the story.

This is what the DCEU should have worked toward instead of throwing away Superman’s death as a moment in a movie that did not need it.  This is so much more compelling and emotional than the Superman death in BvS that it showed what could have been.

The Death of Superman is…

vintage

While Reign of the Supermen is…

goodstuff

The Death of Superman + Reign of the Supermen Double Feature

The Upside

Image result for the upside movie poster

The Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer on this film is at 39%, which made me think that I was in store for a January movie.  However, I like both Kevin Hart and Bryan Cranston, and honestly the trailers looked decent so I was ready to give this a chance.

I really enjoyed this film.  I wondered why so many other reviews had this as rotten.  Listening to Jeremy Jahns on YouTube helped me to maybe find what the answer to that question was.  Apparently, The Upside is a remake of a beloved French movie called The Intouchables, which I have never seen.  This fact makes me wonder if these critics are judging the movie versus this other movie instead of judging it as a film on its own.

I can certainly understand that.  If there was a perfectly competent remake of a movie I loved like Raiders of the Lost ArkBack to the Future or Die Hard, but that perfectly competent remake did not capture the same magic of the original, I would most likely find that it colored my perceptions of it too.  Since that did not happen here, I can look at The Upside through clear lenses. (And to be fair, I did not go through all the reviews to determine if the “rotten” ones were for that reason.  I am simply speculating.)

Dell (Kevin Hart) is an ex-con who is trying to get through life, struggle to repair a relationship with his son and get a job.  Out of necessity, he replies to a job for a janitor, but winds up in the wrong place, interviewing with a wealthy quadriplegic Phillip Lacasse (Bryan Cranston) as a caregiver.  Depressed and lacking care for himself, Phillip hired the clearly unqualified Dell instead of a crew of qualified candidates.

Dell and Phillip have a genuine friendship and a connection develop during their working relationship that shows the strength of both actors.

Honestly, this is the best performance I have seen from Kevin Hart in a long time.  He was in control and contained instead of the “Kevin Hart”-type character that he always plays, loud, boisterous and chaotic.  I found it to be a very welcomed change, proving to me that he was an actor.  Understand, I have always liked Kevin Hart, but I think he is one of those comedic actors (Melissa McCarthy, Tiffany Haddish, Adam Sandler etc) who find themselves typecast and playing the same form of character in every film.  This change is important for his career.

Bryan Cranston is his typically fine self, always giving a professional and well thought out performance.  His expressions were outstanding here, as he was unable to use his body in any other manner.

The film was funny and warm and the relationship between Hart and Cranston was clearly at the center of everything the film did.  Some of the scenes between them were outstanding and was the major reason to see the movie.

Nicole Kidman played Phillip’s assistant Yvonne and she was great as she always is.

I really enjoyed The Upside. I did not have a beloved favorite movie to compare it to so I did not have that blinding me to this movie’s charm as I fear many critics may have done.

3.8 stars