I am glad that you were able to overcome your ill-advised dabbling into the dark underworld of polka. #ZAFLERTINFLOUSE #SENLive
Author Archives: Doc
Goldfinger (1964)

“Do you expect me to talk?”
“No Mr. Bond, I expect you to die.”
Perhaps the most famous quote from the Bond franchise appeared in the third film in the series, one of my all-time favorite Bond films, Goldfinger.
Auric Goldfinger (Gert Fröbe) is our main villain in this installment, a man with an obsession for gold and a plan to irradiate the gold supply at Fort Knox. James Bond (Sean Connery) is along for the ride in an attempt to stop him.
There are some iconic moments and characters that appeared in Goldfinger. Auric Goldfinger’s loyal right hand man, Oddjob (Harold Sakata) and his projectile hat was seen here. We also meet the one and only Pussy Galore (Honor Blackman), the most appropriately named Bond girl ever. The movie contains perhaps one of the most infamous death scenes in film history with the gold paint on the girl, that even appeared on the movie poster.
I have to say, rewatching this after so many years, there is a scene that makes me pretty uncomfortable. James Bond certainly seems as if he forces himself on to Pussy in the barn. They play it off as if she was seduced and became enthralled with Bond, but it sure looked like, at the minimum, sexual assault and, at the worst, rape. This was a different era, but that scene truly plays worse in today’s world.
The rest of the movie is solid, superspy action with an iconic villain facing off against Bond. Bond was off his game nearly the entire film, as Auric kept him distracted throughout. Goldfinger certainly let his “super villain” tendency get in the way of his evil plan. He should have let that laser cut through Bond in that famous scene and his plan would have gone off without a hitch. His own negative tendencies led to his own demise.
It was also interesting how the film recast Felix Leiter. At first, in Dr. No, the CIA agent was played by Jack Lord, who declined the role when offered to him, and now he was portrayed by Cec Linder.
One of the best components of this film is the awesome theme song, something that becomes more of an important part to the franchise moving forward. Goldfinger was sung by Dame Shirley Bassey and it kicks the film off with a mysterious and eerie beginning.
Still near the top of the Bond films, I did find that scene in the hay with James and Pussy to be iffy. Otherwise, this is a classic Bond adventure that redefined the franchise moving forward.


From Russia with Love (1963)

The James Bond film franchise took a step forward with the underappreciated From Russia with Love, another film based on the Ian Fleming books.
Bond (Sean Connery) is in pursuit of a Russian decoding machine, known as “Lektor,” and must gain possession of it before the evil S.P.E.C.T.R.E organization gets its hands on it. The Russian government wants it as well and they send a spy Tatiana Romanov (Daniela Bianchi) to go undercover with Bond to get it.
The Cold War was fully underway and this spy thriller really played into the tensions in the world at the time. It was a film that was not just a “Bond” movie, but could be considered a straight-up Cold War movie itself.
I had no idea how much the Austin Powers characters of Dr. Evil and his crew were parodies of actual characters from the Bond franchise until I saw the members of S.P.E.C.T.R.E. Rosa Klebb (Lotte Lenya) looked to be exactly like Frau Farbissina while the character of Number One (who would eventually be revealed as Blofeld though not named here) was Dr. Evil right down to the cat he held. Having this background makes one appreciate the Austin Powers movie more.
Back to From Russia with Love, there was a distinct Hitchcockian feel to the film, in particular the ending half of the film. Not only did it take place on a train, which was one of Hitchcock’s preferred settings, but the helicopter at the end felt like an allusion to North by Northwest. The inspiration from Hitchcock is what makes this film feel different than some of the other Bond movies.
This is the first time we see M (Bernard Lee) and his gadgets that play a huge role in the film. We also get a powerhouse heavy in Donald “Red” Grant (Robert Shaw).
I was surprised how the film was more connected to Dr. No than I thought it was. I had always pictured the Bond series as more of a one off adventure, but there was definitely continuity involved in the story as “Number One” made reference to Dr. No in this film.
This was a very well done Bond movie and should be considered one of the better installments of the franchise.


Dr. No (1962)

April 2020 was supposed to see the release of the 25th installment in the James Bond franchise, No Time to Die. For that achievement, I had hoped to watch the previous Bond movies in preparation. However, time had caught up with me and, unfortunately, that was something that was not going to happen.
However, with the outbreak of COVID-19 worldwide, the Universal movie was pushed back from its April release date until November 12th, and with the school closed, I suddenly have quite a bit of time to go through the Bond franchise, enough time where I do not even have to binge it.
Which means that I am starting off on Amazon Prime with Dr. No, the 1962 film that started it all, based on the novelized hero from Ian Fleming.
I actually do not think that I had ever seen Dr. No before as this was unfamiliar to me. The adventures of James Bond (Sean Connery) kick off with his battle with Dr. No (Joseph Wiseman) on his nuclear island. The very first Bond girl is here as well as we meet Honey Ryder (Ursula Andress) upon that island.
The film starts with a series of spy movie scenes, including one tense scene with a giant tarantula spider. The first half of this movie was fun, with Bond moving from one bedroom to another. The second half of the movie turned more into the sci-fi type action thriller you might see from this franchise.
Lots of the typical Bond fare was here, but it was considerably lower key than in future installments. I have to say, Bond certainly made his way around with the women too. He probably could not get away with that in today’s society.
Sean Connery is fantastic as James Bond and you can see here why some people place him at the top of the James Bond list. He is charming and likable while still being a dangerous man.
Dr. No begins the trend of the over-the-top Bond villain that we see consistently over the years. Dr. No was fine for what he was, but the best thing that Dr. No would do was name drop the organization Spectre, which becomes a huge recurring enemy for Bond.
There are plenty of moments that make you wonder what people are thinking and why they do not just shoot Bond or Honey when they have the chance. That credibility is stretched throughout the entire franchise, a franchise that certainly requires some suspension of disbelief. The viewer is willing to do this because you are having such a good time with the character of Bond that you forgive the conveniences of the spy’s life.
I was also surprised to see original Hawaii 5-0 star Jack Lord as CIA agent Felix Leiter. I was not expecting that familiar of a face to pop up in the movie.
Dr. No was fun and exciting, providing an entertaining escape for the viewer and helped plant the seeds for the future of the Bond series. A definite good start.


Wendy
Another 39% on Rotten Tomatoes? Another film that I enjoyed way more than the score shows. I found the movie Wendy that popped up on Vudu today. The Peter Pan story has had a hard run recently, but this film takes that tale in an all new direction.
Wendy (Devin France) and her older brothers, the twins Douglas (Gage Naquin) and James (Gavin Naquin), jump aboard a train, escaping their problematic lives. Peter (Yashua Mack) leads the three of them to his island where they never grow old and stay young forever.
The re-imagining of the Peter Pan tale is done extremely well here, which is even more impressive considering how bad some of the other films involving it have been (e.g. Pan). This has a more realistic feel to it than any other version of the story I have seen before. I had an immediate feel of “The Lord of the Flies” to this movie. The kids on their own, trying to create their own little world.
Some of the fantastical elements of the movie (specifically Mother) did not work as well as most of the film because this is simply did not make much sense. You did not understand what Mother was or what abilities she had. It was a mysterious part of the story that was underdeveloped.
However, the kids who aged, while also fantastical, was a much more fascinating story. This was used as a way to bring into the story the new version of Captain Hook (Kevin Pugh). The introduction of Hook was extremely emotional,tragic and very well done.
The kids did a great job leading this story. Devin France as Windy was fantastic, but felt so much older than she was. I pictured her as a much older person than what she was playing. She has a distinct presence about her and could have a bright future.
I also found Yashua Mack to be charming and really a perfect Peter Pan. He captured the style and the panache of the iconic character for a more realistic world. The use of “flying” in this movie was done so well with the train and with the water and this technique was very creative.
Directed by Benh Zeitlin, the look of the shots and the cinematography is an even greater benefit for this movie. It is unfortunate that I won’t have the chance to see this film on the big screen, because that would be an experience worth the time.
Though this is based on the classic children’s story, Wendy is not necessarily a film that would be good for children. This is much more targeted for an adult audience with its slower storytelling and its adult language and themes. Younger viewers may be bored during scenes that I found invigorating and life affirming.
This is way better than 39% and you should search this one out.
4 stars
ZaFlertinFlouse
The International Superstar has been on SEN Live all week… trending on Twitter… #ZaFlertinFlouse







Love Wedding Repeat

Apparently, this new Netflix film has quite a low score on Rotten Tomatoes (at 35%) and a low audience score (39%) as well. This is a good example of how subjective film can be, because I really enjoyed this movie.
I found Love Wedding Repeat to be extremely charming and very funny.
It is Hayley’s (Eleanor Tomlinson) wedding day, but when an old flame Marc (Jack Farthing) arrives at the wedding with intentions of ruining it, Hayley looks to her brother Jack (Sam Claflin) for help. She gives Jack a sleep sedative and wants him to drug Marc. This all gets in the way of Jack’s attempts to meet up with an old flame of his own Dina (Olivia Munn).
When the plan to slip the sedative in Marc’s champagne glass goes awry, trouble ensues.
After everything plays out, we flash back to the key moment and go on an alternate version of the reception occurs. The story then takes a new twist as the wedding moments play out in a new way.
I enjoyed the twist of the movie where they simply rewind and replay the last part of the wedding. It was a clever and funny way to go.
Sam Claflin is at the heart of the movie and he does a wonderful job of carrying the story. All of the pieces of the story flow through him and his down-on-his-luck character seems to fit him beautifully. I found myself really rooting for this guy who is putting his efforts to help his sister ahead of everything else.
Olivia Munn is also very good in this movie although I could have used more form her. She had some really great chemistry with Claflin.
There were some storylines in the film that felt like they were crammed in for really no actual reasons. Jack’s ex-girlfriend (Frieda Pinto) and her new boyfriend (Allan Mustafa) are here and she was taunting him about Jack’s penis size. These two were not that funny, though there were a couple of moments. Otherwise, I enjoyed the rest of the film.
I laughed a lot during this film. There was a very British feel to this film in the manner of comedy and it seemed to work for me.
I do not know why so many people disliked this film, but I respectfully disagree with them. I found this rom-com clever and creative, with good humor and well acted. Give it a try. Keep your mind open.
3.8 stars
Impractical Jokers: The Movie

This is a movie based on a TV show that I have only seen a few times. I have never been a big fan of the show, but I have a friend who loves the show.
This film is a blend between a scripted plot and the TV show, where the four “Impractical Jokers,” Joe Gatto, James Murray, Brian Quinn and Sal Vulcano, set up a situation where one of them go into a public place and act silly or ridiculous as the one gets lines fed to him by the other three to make it worse.
We see a flashback to the early nineties and the four guys, in high school, have a terrible night after sneaking into a Paula Abdul concert. Decades later, they run into Paula again, but she does not recognize the group as the troublemakers from all those years ago. She recognizes them as The Impractical Jokers and invite them to a party in Miami. However, she accidentally only gives them three passes. The four decide to have hidden camera “jokes” as they do on their show and the loser of them misses the show.
The movie is kind of dumb. The written story that surrounds the skits is about as dumb as it can get.
However, the skits on the road, which are much like the TV show, actually made me laugh several times. This looked to be done with real people along the way who are unaware that they are being filmed and that these guys are acting. I have to say, there are a couple of times that the looks on the faces of the real people make me think that they are either playing along or have figured out what is going on. The gimmick works best when the people do not know what is happening and they have that WTF expression on their face.
There was a really fun bit with a job interview situation, maybe the best of the skits.
So there are really two parts to this film. One that does not work at all and is pretty dumb, and one part that has some really funny moments and is pretty dumb. As I have said before, funny helps cover weaknesses of films. This film is not an exception.
Fans of the TV show should enjoy this. I am not a fan of the show, but there were some funny bits of the show. The four guys certainly have a loose and comfortable friendship that creates a positive tone. I have seen worse comedies.
2.5 stars
EYG Top 10 One-Hit Wonder Directors

It is Tuesday, so it was time for the Top 10 podcast with John Rocha and Matt Knost. The topics these days are different than normal, since the theaters are closed and they do not have new films opening because of the COVID-19 virus. This week’s topic came from a viewer suggestion for Top 10 One-Hit Wonder Movie Directors.
This topic requires a ton of definitions involved. For example, what is a “hit.” Is it a great movie? Is it a successful movie? Does making money despite being a garbage film. An example on the show was Michael Bay. The Rock might be a great film, but are the Transformers movies hits?
What about directors who only had one basic film and then never did anything else? How about films that were highly acclaimed critically but may not have knocked the box office on its butt? How about a film that has a bunch of sequels but may not have had a great financial run?
In the end, I think I am using all of those as a possibility. There will be no Michael Bay because he had a bunch of financial hits.
Number one was tough this week again, because no film really jumped out at me. I had to struggle to choose the one that tops this list.
#10. Brian Helgeland, 42. I enjoyed the film by Brian Helgeland that tells the story of Jackie Robinson and his first year in Major League Baseball. Being a Dodger fan, I enjoyed this movie very much and our future Black Panther, Chadwick Boseman as Jackie.
#9. Neill Blomkamp, District 9. District 9 has made its appearance on several lists recently. It is truly a great sci-fi film. Honestly, Neil Blomkamp has just not reached this level since. Elysium and Chappie were such flops. Hopefully, this is a director that will not continue on a list like this one in the future.
#8. Renny Harlin, Die Hard 2. Die Hard 2 is a film that does not get the appreciation because it followed the absolutely classic Die Hard. Yes, there are some beats similar, however, I found this to be one of my favorite Die Hard films. Bruce Willis brought John McClane back to the big screen in a fantastic manner. Cliffhanger could be an argument for Renny, but there is not much more on his IMDB page.
#7. Josh Trank, Chronicle. Chronicle was a fabulous found footage film detailing the origin story of a group of high school students who gained super powers. This film really sent Trank into the stratosphere of film. It led to the FOX Fantastic Four film. Unfortunately, that became a massive flop, but, as many believe, because of studio influence. Chronicle also gave us Michael B. Jordan in one of his earliest roles.
#6. Richard Kelly, Donnie Darko. Donnie Darko is a classic film, and a hugely underrated one. Richard Kelly created a great science fiction film with a giant rabbit named Frank. Donnie Darko was a trippy mind-mess of a film that had some amazing twists. All the while, the film was shot beautifully. Jake Gyllenhaal appeared as the title character which helped him become one of the best actors currently working in Hollywood today.
#5. Kinka Usher, Mystery Men. I loved the Mystery Men. It is a comic based film that does not receive the type of recognition that it deserves. There is a amazing cast including Ben Stiller, William H. Macy, Hank Azaria, Paul Reubens, Janeane Garofalo, Greg Kinnear and Geoffrey Rush. The Mystery Men is a comedy and it delivers the laughs along with some of the top characters you will find. The whole story is weaved together well and Kinka Usher deserves a lot of credit.
#4. Michel Gondrey, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. One of the best performances in the career of Jim Carrey and Michel Gondrey deserves a lot of credit for that. Eternal Sunshine may not be a huge monetary hit, but it is a film that has persevered and became more of a hit over the years. It is one of those films that always finds its way onto “best of” lists and I know of some people who would place this at the very top. It is one of the most creative stories on this list and the performances are top line.
#3. Eduardo Sánchez and Daniel Myrick, The Blair Witch Project. I agree with the analysis made today by Matt Knost. He placed this film high on his top 10 list and stated that it was this high because of the legacy of the film. Without Blair Witch, we do not get the entire genre of found footage that graced the screen afterwards. It also gave horror a shot in the arm. The movie was extremely creepy and I enjoyed it enough. The gimmick of whether or not this was a true story helped the buzz around the film. No one was really 100% sure right away. While there are films on this list that I prefer over Blair Witch, you cannot debate the importance of the work.
#2. James McTeigue, V for Vendetta. Based on a DC Comics graphic novel by Alan Moore, this movie was a thrill ride of action and characterization. Moore was not a fan of the film, but I think that is his own issues and he is allowed to feel that way. I love the film myself. The creation of V is just a cinematic wonder and his relationship with Natalie Portman’s character was epic. The way she gets broken down and brought around is a challenge. V for Vendetta was a great film.
#1. James Franco, The Disaster Artist. This was probably my favorite film on the list and that made it number one on this list. I did struggle to choose the number one choice. Franco is the only director on this list that who also stars in the film he is directing. His performance as real life Tommy Wiseau is amazing. Being able to go from such a character that Wiseau was and then to head to the director’s chair is an impressive feat.
Honorable Mention: Some other choices I considered were Ruben Fleischer for Zombieland. I considered Scott Derrickson for Dr. Strange, but the term “hit” knocked him out since Sinister made a ton of money on its low budget. Billy Bob Thornton‘s Sling Blade nearly made #10. Brad Silberling‘s work on Lemony Snicket’s A Series of Unfortunate Events was impressive too.

A Time to Kill (1996)

I gave it my best chance, but I had to eliminate the Punish-Myself-Binge at four movies. Sorry, but that was all I could stand.
I have been wanting to re-watch this film for awhile now and I figured this would be a good time to go ahead and do it.
A Time to Kill is a film directed by Joel Schumacher and starred Matthew McConaughey, Samuel L. Jackson and Sandra Bullock.
After the brutal rape of his 10-year old daughter by two white boys, Carl Lee Hailey (Samuel L. Jackson) took justice into his own hands, shooting and killing them on the steps of the Mississippi courthouse. Cocky young lawyer Jake Brigance (Matthew McConaughey) took the case which ignited a racial firestorm.
Race is a huge theme of the film, of course, with the question of whether Carl Lee Hailey could receive a fair trial in Mississippi being right out front. The Ku Klux Klan became a huge part of the conflict as well, bringing the level of hatred and violence to a deadly height.
Speaking of that, I wonder if Keifer Sutherland was really glad to get cast as Jack Bauer in the 24 series, because he was constantly being cast as steel faced villains in so many films of the time. Here he was Freddie Cobb, the brother of one of the men Carl Lee shot and the emphasis behind the return of the KKK to the town. Kiefer had a menacing glare that he put on display in a ton of films, from Stand By Me to A Few Good Men to The Lost Boys. I’m just saying that it was probably a relief to be seen as a hero once.
While some of this film drags, the scenes in the courtroom, in particular Jake’s summation, is powerful and emotionally resonant. When the film is at its best, the film is soaring.
Samuel L. Jackson is great as Carl Lee and his relationship with Jake is vital to the film and the resolution of the case.
Sandra Bullock, Donald Sutherland, Charles Dutton, Oliver Platt, Ashley Judd, Kevin Spacey, and Chris Cooper lead a cast that is very strong with all of their performances.
A Time to Kill hits hard and has a great message that is still relevant today.


Cop Out (2010)

The fourth movie in the Punish-Myself-Binge was destined to be perceived by me differently simply because it followed my viewing of the horrid The Love Guru. It couldn’t be worse, could it?
Cop Out was the notorious buddy cop movie directed by Kevin Smith and starring Bruce Willis and Tracy Morgan. Cop Out received an 18% on Rotten Tomatoes and a pretty low 39% on the audience score. Kevin Smith tells a story about how difficult it was for him to work with Bruce Willis. Still, could it be worse than The Love Guru?
Well, by comparison to The Love Guru, Cop Out looks like The Godfather. It’s not, of course. It’s a bad movie, but after watching the travesty that was the Mike Myers’ mess, anything would have looked better. In fact, Cop Out was probably the best of the four movies that I have looked at so far today.
That is not saying that I would consider this that elusive “guilty pleasure” that I started this binge looking for because it was not. Still, there were some parts that were fine.
Cop Out was predictable and featured just about every last buddy cop trope imaginable. Tracy Morgan was just too loud all the time (although there was a cute scene in an interrogation room where Morgan was quoting movies).
The story was simple and yet way too messy. The main villain, named Poh Boy, was desperately distracting because I recognized him but could not place the face. It bothered me for the first half of the movie until I broke down and pulled out IMDB for a search. As soon as I saw a more recent picture of the actor playing Poh Boy, which was Guillermo Diaz, I recognized him as Huck from Scandal. That was a relief.
This could have easily have been a Bad Boys movie without breaking a sweat. Kevin Hart could take the role played by Tracy Morgan and make it his own. There was absolutely nothing special or different about this movie, which is usually not what you see in a Kevin Smith movie. Of course, this was a big studio film that helped convince Smith to basically do his own films from then on.
Cop Out fell into a good space in my viewing schedule because I did like it more than Twilight, The Love Guru and The Last Airbender, but it will never be confused with a good movie.


The Love Guru (2008)
Good God.
The third movie in my Punish-Myself-Binge may just be the worst of the three, which is saying something considering I watched Twilight and The Last Airbender.
The Love Guru was up next and it is absolutely one of the most unfunny, obnoxious, downright offensive movie I have ever seen. It was at 14% on Rotten Tomatoes, which is actually higher than I thought it would be. Truthfully, even the audience score was low, down at 33%.
And I really like Mike Myers. I have always enjoyed him. I loved him as Tommy Maitland, the host of The new Gong Show as well as other of his films. This thing though… it is atrocious.
There are quality actors in this train wreck too. It is one of those movies that make you wonder why they would take a chance with their careers being involved in this piece of garbage. For God’s sake, Stephen Colbert and John Oliver, who are absolutely magnificent normally and who I love, are in this film and they can’t even pull this from the crapper.
This is up there with the absolute worst films I have ever seen. It is Movie 43, Batman & Robin, Holmes & Watson bad.
I am really struggling to get through this binge. This thing is just a total waste of time and, despite being quarantined, I can think of 100 things to do better with my time than watching The Love Guru.
Maybe the whole Punish-Myself-Binge was a bad idea. However, perhaps the next one will be better. IT HAS TO BE!

Twilight (2008)
![]()
So I was looking for a theme for this weekend’s binge-a-thon and then I watched The Last Airbender. After watching that atrocious film, I came up with an idea. It is officially the Punish-Myself-Binge. The rules… I had to choose films that are considered terrible by many (if not most) and that I had never seen before. That way, I can look at them with fresh eyes and make my own judgment. I would do my best not to allow the film’s reputation creep into my review. Who knows… maybe I can find a guilty pleasure or two.
Unfortunately, the second (remember Last Airbender was the first) film in the Punish-Myself-Binge will not be the guilty pleasure.
The 2nd film is Twilight, which sits at a 49% on Rotten Tomatoes and I have never watched the entire film. Yes I have seen bits of it, but it still qualifies. I did not find this to be any good because, mainly, I am not a teenage girl.
Twilight is melodramatic claptrap that should be ashamed of inspiring the Fifty Shades of Gray series. This is a film that Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson have spent years trying to overcome. They are two really exceptional actors now but who were anything but at this point.
Let’s ignore the fact that vampires should not sparkle in the sunlight (they should burst into flames). Let’s ignore the fact that Edward stated that he had been 17 years old for years (which makes one wonder how he dealt with school). Let’s just look at the relationship between Bella and Edward.
Why should I invest with these two dopey kids? I am not sure exactly why Bella started to like Edward, outside of the “he’s good looking” vibe. He was anything but nice to her. In fact, he acted as if she stunk. Hey, that sounds like a winner. Does he save her? Yes, but he was also rude and obnoxious about it. In my mind, she fell for Edward really quickly. Certainly not quickly enough to accept that he was a vampire.
She figured out the secret of his vampirism, but why would that not send her screaming into the night?
There are as many scenes in Twilight that make me want to laugh as any other. It was quite funny, albeit unintentionally. The tree jumping scene had my mouth hanging open.
Oh, and the baseball scene with the rival vampire group. LOL
Anna Kendrick was in this. I did not know that.
Bella was one of the biggest damsels in distress I have ever seen in any movies. She was constantly in trouble and requiring saving. There is zero to the character outside of her loveliness.
And should I talk about that ending? Holy cow it was just horrible. The scene with Edward saving Bella with his family burning James (Cam Gigandet) was surreal and laugh out loud ridiculous.
Boy this was bad. And not so bad it was good either.

Hope I can maintain this Punish-Myself-Binge…
![]()
The Last Airbender (2010)

With the continual staying at home during the COVID-19 pandemic, it gives me an opportunity to finally watch what some consider to be one of the worst movies ever made. I have never taken the time to watch M. Night Shyamalan’s infamous The Last Airbender. Could it be as atrocious as so many people say?
Simply put… yes, it can be.
This is utterly horrific.
I was not a fan of the EYG Hall of Fame series, Avatar: The Last Airbender, but I can imagine that dedicated fans of that animated series could only look at this adaptation as an insult and a slap to the face.
I mean, there is nothing here that is good at all. The acting is wooden and dull. The dialogue of the film is some of the worst you are ever going to hear on a wide release of a big budget tentpole film. The CGI and special effects are laughable. I don’t know how many times I looked at the screen and thought to myself, “Hey, green screen!”
Dev Patel is in this mess. He would eventually become a respected actor, but it had to have been a challenge overcoming this movie. Both Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson had to work really hard to get past their roles in Twilight. Fortunately for Dev there was only one The Last Airbender to get by.
Boring. Ridiculous story and dialogue. Acting? Ugh. CGI that was just not good.
It is amazing but everybody was right about this. It was one of the worst things I have seen and it was utter garbage. One of the rare films to receive this classification….


Trolls World Tour
A sequel that we did not need turned out to be better than it had any reason to be.
I was not a fan of the first Trolls movie. It felt way too saccharine sweet and irritating. So I was anything but looking forward to the follow up, Trolls World Tour. Yet, this was entertaining.
I don’t think it is just because I have been stuck inside for almost a month.
The arrival of Barb (Rachel Bloom), the Queen of Rock, who was in search of the mythical strings of music in order to make Rock and Roll the dominant force and end the rest of the music of the Troll world. Pop Queen Poppy (Anna Kendrick) is determined that she can make Barb understand that all the music can exist together. Branch (Justin Timberlake) went with her to help where he could.
A rush of color and music filled the screen throughout the movie and there were some really clever writing involved in the plot. The film kind of reminded me of the LEGO Movie as there were lots of inside jokes and crafty word play. It was way more intelligent than I remember it being in the first film.
The music was fine, but there was nothing here that would be able to match the catchy thrill and beat of Justin Timberlake’s Can’t Stop the Feeling. There was some toe tapping going on, but I do not think there is anything that is worth remembering long term musically.
There were lots of cool voice cameos happening here including Mary J. Blige, Ozzy Osbourne, Sam Rockwell, George Clinton, Kelly Clarkson, and Jamie Dornan.
So I think it was way more entertaining than I ever believed it would be. I had a smile on my face through the movie and found myself engaged in the story. It was a quick run time and did not waste time. It may have been even too quick at times.
This was a good time. Who knew?