An American Tail (1986)

An American Tail Movie Poster #3 - Internet Movie Poster Awards ...

Recently, I joined the Patreon of Dan Murrell, formerly of Screen Junkies and now starting his own YouTube channel.  I have been a fan of Dan for several years, back to the old days of Movie Fights.  I joined his Patreon basically to join his Movie Club.  One of the first films he put forth as a film to watch was the animated An American Tail.

Produced by Steven Spielberg, An American Tail tells the story of little mouse Fievel (Phillip Glasser), a Russian immigrant to the United States, who gets separated from his family on the trip.  Fievel’s family came to America because they believed that there were no cats in America.

The animation here is surprisingly good, though it looks like a basic cartoon.  There are some scenes that are just beautifully drawn and the imagery is, at times, haunting.

The music is really well done, but it is not overused.  Somewhere Out There is a beautiful song and the duet with Fievel and Tiger (Dom DeLuise) is a lot of fun.

Fievel sure goes through a lot in this movie and the near misses with him and his family were maddening.  The little mouse has to face so much adversity that it really builds to a powerful emotional moment in that third act of the film.

This movie is certainly from the perspective of an immigrant to the United States, something that is relevant in this point of time in our history.  An American Tail uses imagery of the Statue of Liberty to promote that theme.  The attitude of the mice in coming from Russia, looking for a better life in America is a powerful message that we should still embrace.

I think as well that the fact that these Russian mice are basically Jewish is a great use of the animation.  It allows children to see a different culture represented on the screen without it being called into attention.

This was the first time I actually saw this movie and I enjoyed it quite a bit.

classic

An American Tail Movie Poster #3 - Internet Movie Poster Awards ...

Quantum of Solace (2008)

Quantum of Solace Posters and Prints | Posterlounge.com

After a bit of a break with James Bond, I have returned to get the second of the Daniel Craig Bonds with Quantum of Solace.

When I first saw this, I was very disappointed.  After the stunning success that was Casino Royale, I had high expectations for this film and, honestly, it fell flat for me.

James Bond becomes involved in a case to try and stop a shadowy and mysterious international organization from doing general bad guy stuff (it is not clear).  The story leads Bond to a environmentalist named Dominic Greene (Mathieu Amalric), who was involved in an assassination attempt on M.  There is a storyline involving a South American despot too, but it is fairly convoluted.

I still enjoyed the performance of Daniel Craig, and I also enjoyed the relationship that they were building between Bond and M (Judi Dench), but the rest of this action film was just blah.  The villain was forgettable.  The story was lacking.  They did not give me much specifics to care about anything that was happening here.

They tried to recreate the stunning foot chase scene from Casino Royale, but this one was a pale imitation.

There are some good action set pieces, including a thrilling scene with airplanes, but action without reason or connection is Transformers movies.  Especially after the rousing masterpiece of Casino Royale, Quantum of Solace was all the more lacking.

Daniel Craig holds no level of disappointment though as he continues to be outstanding as a grittier, more hard nosed Bond than we have seen before.  There is a feeling that this guy would rip your throat out if he felt like it.  This Bond is a killer first whereas the other Bonds are more of a lover first.  Craig did have some solid emotional moments too though, specifically in a scene with Mathis (Giancarlo Giannini).

Sadly, this movie feels like a placeholder between Casino Royale and Skyfall, which will be up next.  I have just two more Bond films (three if I choose to go back for the 1967 Casino Royale) and Skyfall has been one of my favorites since it came out.  We’ll see if it holds up.

Underwhelming

Quantum of Solace Posters and Prints | Posterlounge.com

 

The Lodge

The Lodge (2019) - IMDb

The Lodge has arrived on streaming today and I had heard a lot of split feelings on it.  I was excited to see it.

Richard (Richard Armitage) told his wife Laura (Alicia Silverstone) that he wanted a divorce because he had fallen in love with Grace (Riley Keough), a woman he met while writing a book about her childhood inside a suicide cult.  This led to Laura’s suicide.

The children, Aiden (Jaeden Martell) and Mia (Lia McHugh), blamed Grace for their mother’s suicide, creating a tense and uncomfortable situation.  Richard decided to take his family to a lodge over Christmas to hopefully make up some ground.  Unfortunately, Richard had to go to work for a couple of days and he leaves the children alone with Grace.  Then, a snowstorm hits stranding them.

It turned out that Grace required medication to keep her mental health in check, as she suffered from memories of her dark past.

This film is a slow burn.  The pace of the film is slow and went in circles for a chunk of the film while they are at the lodge.  The film tried to make you feel that certain things were happening and tried to keep the audience uncertain.

The Lodge is definitely going to try to make the audience uneasy, uncomfortable and disturbed.  To be fair, the film is not that scary.  It is more of a psychological thriller than it is a horror movie.

Honestly, there was nobody here to really cheer for.  Everybody was horrible.  The children were cruel to Grace, who was only trying to get to know them, and Grace was keeping the medication from Richard.  The film was not sure who it wanted to focus upon which did not help with the audience’s choice.

The story here is messy and requires the audience to accept a lot of weird choices and coincidences.  Throw in the uncertainty of what was happening and the lack of a person to root for, The Lodge had some issues for sure.

It is not the worst film of the year, but, it did not really try to tell you a story. It tried to make you feel disturbed and unnerved.  It succeeded in that.  However, there is just not enough after those feelings for The Lodge to be considered a well done movie.

2.5 stars 

Justice League Dark: Apokolips War

SNEAK PEEK: "Justice League Dark: Apokolips War

The latest Warner Brothers Animation wrapped up a series of the recent animated movies in its own Endgame style story.  It is an adaptation of the comic storyline, The Darkseid War, and concluded the 15 film arc from the DC Animated Universe.

I have to say, this was considerably better than the film that it is a direct sequel of, Justice League Dark.  They do a considerably better job of avoiding the excessive exposition, which weighed down the last film.  This film moves smoothly from scene to scene and they brought in different characters beautifully.

The film starts off with Superman (Jerry O’Connell) bringing the Justice League together and planning on launching a preemptive attack on Apokolips to destroy Darkseid (Tony Todd) and his forces.  Unfortunately, Darkseid knew they were coming and it turned into a slaughter.

The film jumps into the future and the earth is in a terrible state and Darkseid is robbing the earth of its molten core.  Batman (Jason O’Mara) has been controlled and is Darkseid’s new right hand man.  A de-powered Superman is recruiting survivors for another attempt to stop Darkseid.  He started with John Constantine (Matt Ryan).

The film does a great job of bringing in other characters, such as the Suicide Squad, Swamp Thing (Roger Cross), and Damian Wayne (Stuart Allan).  Etrigan (Ray Chase) is seemingly the “Fat Thor” of this film.

Most of the main characters here get to have a moment in the film.  Wonder Woman, Harley Quinn, Robin, Constantine, Etrigan, Captain Boomerang, Cyborg, Raven, and Lois Lane have their big time moments and they feel as if each of the character earns them.

There were some things that I was uncertain about such as the use of Lex Luthor (Rainn Wilson), but I do not think that I have seen anywhere close to the 15 animated movies that would have proceeded this film.  I went with the film though as I preferred that than going over everything again.

I do think there might be some issues to those who do not have the background with DC Comics as I do.  It definitely helped as I watched.

Yes, the animation continued to be below what it should be.  I will say that I thought the animation here was better than it has been before.  I still think that this animation is too choppy and brings down the level of quality overall.

Overall though, I think this is an excellent film and does a great job of wrapping up the series of movies.  This uses the great DC characters in extremely positive manner.  It will be interesting how the animation at DC will move forward after this.

4.3 stars

Justice League Dark (2017)

Amazon.com: Kirbis Justice League Dark Movie Poster 18 x 28 Inches ...

A new animated Justice League Dark film is being released today on VOD streaming systems so I figured it was time to take a look at the first Justice League Dark film.

When a magic problem comes to the earth, Batman (Jason O’Mara) has to find some heavy hitters that are more likely to be effective than the normal heroes he hangs out with.  He is pointed in the correct direction by Boston Brand aka Deadman (Nicolas Turturro).  The correct direction is toward Zatanna (Camilla Luddington) and John Constantine (MattRyan).

Throw in Jason Blood, who has been bound for years to the demon Etrigan (Ray Chase) and a little help from Swamp Thing (Roger Cross) and you’ve got Justice League Dark.

Unfortunately, there are several issues with this animated movie.  First, there is just too much exposition.  I understand why that is considering we have all of these new heroes and we have to introduce them.  The problem is the movie does not do a great job of showing us these heroes.  Even times when they did show us who these characters were, there was too much exposition involved (ex. the origin of Etrigan.

The magic use here is another problem because we do not have a basis for what the magic looks like.  The spells used by Zatanna and Constantine are confusing and is not clear.  The whole battle with Felix Faust (Enrico Colantoni) was boring.  Faust was a terrible antagonist in that second act.

A third issue is that, despite there is a lot of exposition, I still did not understand what a lot of these people are and how they are connected.  I do not have a deep understanding of who John Constantine is or how he was connected to Zatanna or to Ritchie (Jeremy Davies) and the film does not give that info outside of the very surface answers.  That kept me at a distance with all of those.  Perhaps if I knew Constantine better, maybe it would not have bothered me as much.

Now, I did enjoy Batman here.  Swamp Thing was a nice surprise (although he is dispatched too easy at the end).  I enjoyed the part at the hospital and I wish there was more like this.  I have always enjoyed Deadman so it was nice to see him get a little focus.

The animation was not at the level that these movies should be at.  DC animation has been great over the years, but they have consistently not had the kind of animation that they should.  These movies could be huge hits if they would put a little more into them.

I do think there is one major factor about this.  The next Justice League Dark movie will not require the amount of set up as this one needed and it could be good. These characters are interesting and deserve to be seen, but the first film was just too much set up.

tweener

Amazon.com: Kirbis Justice League Dark Movie Poster 18 x 28 Inches ...

Tombstone Rashomon

Adam Newberry in Tombstone-Rashomon (2017)

I received an e-mail from TriCoast Entertainment, a company in California, offering EYG an opportunity to review a movie called Tombstone Rashomon.  The e-mail described it as a “Western mockumentary” filmed in the style of the Japanese classic Rashomon, from director Akira Kurosawa.  I had been looking recently to increase my exposure to the Western genre and this sounded intriguing.  I agreed to review the film, which looked to have been originally released in some form around 2016/17.  It was directed by Alex Cox (Sid and Nancy, Repo Man).

To prepare for this film, I did watch the classic Rashomon by Kurosawa, which introduced the concept of the Rashomon Effect.  The Rashomon Effect is a term that indicates that different eye witnesses might give different stories of the same event, whether it be because of a differing point of view or an attempt to make oneself look better.  This has been used as a point in many movies since Rashomon.

In this mockumentary, the true life story of Tombstone, specifically, the “Gunfight at the O.K. Corral” is told through a series of interviews with the survivors.  According to the film, a time traveling video crew arrived in Tombstone, but they arrived one day too late so they were forced to tell the story of the gunfight via the survivors’ eye witness testimony.  This was a problem.

The science fiction aspect of this mockumentary is kept at the bare minimum, and, though the concept is captivating, I have to wonder why it was used.  There were a few moments of futuristic storytelling (such as the appearance of a police car during one fo the recounts) that felt jarring.  The voice of the interviewer (Susan Sebanc) had a robotic tinge to it, which was an odd choice.

Beyond the strange use of sci-fi, the interviews were remarkably compelling and these character were truly brought to life by the writing and the solid performances of the able cast.

The questions posed by this time-traveling crew were meant to get to the bottom of what actually happened on October 26, 1881 in Tombstone, Arizona Territory, United States.  There was a violent confrontation between local lawmen Wyatt Earp (Adam Newberry), Marshal Virgil Earp (Jason Graham), Morgan Earp (Shayn Herndon) and John “Doc” Holliday (Eric Schumacher) and the outlaw band the Cowboys which included Ike Clanton (Benny Lee Kennedy), brothers Tom (Bradford Trojan) and Frank (Hayden Winston) McLaury, Billy Claiborne (Rogelio Camarillo Jr) and Billy Clanton (James Miller).  The Earps, who had had various issues with the Cowboys in the past, were on their way to disarm them.  Local sheriff John Behan (Jesse Lee Pacheco) attempted to keep the violence from breaking out, but turned into a bone of contention with a contradictory story.

The interviews in this mockumentary do a fantastic job of setting up the story and creating the uncertainty around exactly what had happened on Fremont Street in Tombstone.  They created moments of characterization allowing the audience to make their own determination at the character’s biases and the accuracy of their tale.  For example, Sheriff John Behan is shown in a light that makes me question certain details of his story.  I thought actor Jesse Lee Pacheco was one of the top interviews in the film.

Then there was the interview featuring Kate Horoney (Christina Doidge), aka Big Nose Kate, which detailed her time with Doc Holliday including a time when she had been plied with alcohol by the Sheriff and Milton Joyce (Barney Burman) in an attempt to get her to sign an affidavit against Holliday for crimes including a stage coach robbery.  This brought some extra color to the character of Holliday, but Kate’s constant use of the feminine pronouns “she” and “her” and her references to husbands being “wives” was somewhat confusing at first.  It eventually became humorous, and it was clearly meant to be a joke, but it did cause me some initial uncertainty about what was being said.

The mockumentary was well filmed and had some wonderful Western scenery.  The imagery of the time was on display throughout and really worked well with the story and the different versions being told.  The film was also effective when it flashed from current day Tombstone to 1881 Tombstone, keeping the feel of legacy in place.

After watching the mockumentary, I did some research on the Gunfight at the O.K. Corral and I found that the film was extremely accurate in just about everything presented, including the differing stories.  It had an extremely correct historical accuracy, of course, with the exception of the time travel element.  I was very impressed with how they wove the different eye witness testimonies together to create a reasonably valid historical record (albeit with a time traveling crew and a police car).

I found Tombstone Rashomon to be an effective and engaging use of the mockumentary style, creating engaging characters and illustrating their stories in a manner that both serviced the characters and helped to inform the mysteries surrounding the historical narrative.  All performances were extremely well done and helped form these real life and, sometimes, famous people into gripping, fascinating characters.

3.9 stars 

Casino Royale (2006)

Casino Royale Classic James Bond Movie Poster Movie | Etsy

Wow.

I had not seen Casino Royale for quite a long time.  It may have been since it was released.  I remember really liking the movie at the time, but, now on re-watch, this thing was simply brilliant.

Daniel Craig took over from Pierce Brosnan and brought with him an all new Bond, unlike any before him.  The closest Bond to Craig before this would be Timothy Dalton, but there is still no comparison.  I might go as far as to say that this is the single best performance by any Bond actor in the entire 40+ year franchise.

This whole film felt like a reboot of the franchise, despite the fact that M was still here and still being played by Judi Dench.  However, in the film, it started with the promotion of James Bond to Double O status.  The cold open flashback in black and white was beautiful and set the stage for the new version of 007 we would be getting.

This was an all-new Bond.  A gritty, dirty, hard-hitting and violent Bond that embraced the violence.  All other Bonds felt as if they were somehow slightly above the violence, even when he was killing people.  The very aura of Bond is different.

And if the black and white beginning wasn’t cool enough, the movie moved right into what is one of the greatest chase scenes in movie history with an utterly amazing parkour style chase that had scene after scene of just jaw-dropping stunts.  The best part of this chase was that it was real and look as if it could be done.  Compare this to the chase scene in Die Another Day with the speedboats.  That was ridiculous.  This was epic.

Casino Royale also showed us some of the most anxiety-ridden poker scenes you are going to see.  The tension in those poker hands were just as distressing as any of the action scenes.

Mads Mikkelsen was the perfect foil for Bond in these poker scene.  Playing Le Chiffre, Mikkelsen kept the audience off balance the entire time.  You knew that Le Chiffre was not just after the money.  We knew that he was in danger during the whole time, which kind of mitigated the steps he took.  Well, sort of.

The whole poisoning/heart attack scene with Bond was unbelievably remarkable.  This showed us what our new Bond was going to be like.

Then the end of the film was unlike other Bond films.  He did not wind up sleeping with the Bond girl as the credits rolled.  It turned the Bond formula on its head and revitalized the entire franchise.

After the last couple of Bond films, Casino Royale was completely welcome.  It was serious and violent.  It was great performances all around and boy was this fantastic.

paragon

Casino Royale Classic James Bond Movie Poster Movie | Etsy

Die Another Day (2002)

Die Another Day (2002) Original One-Sheet Movie Poster - Original ...

Looks like Pierce Brosnan’s Bond is heading out with a whimper…or maybe with a bunch of gratuitous explosions.

I had hoped that the last of Brosnan’s Bonds would be better than The World is Not Enough, but, unfortunately, it was anything but.  In fact, it was considerably worse…one of the worst in the franchise.

It is an utter mess from the start right through to the fantasy ending.

James Bond (Pierce Brosnan) is on a mission in North Korea, and gets captured.  After being tortured for months, England arranged a trade for the terrorist Zao (Rick Yune) because they believed that Bond had been broken and had given vital information to the Koreans.  This led to Bond being stripped of his position and held in custody.  Bond escaped and headed after Zao to find out who betrayed him.

Bond followed Zao to Cuba where he met Jinx (Halle Berry) and hijinks ensued.

Meanwhile, millionaire Gustav Graves (Toby Stephens) has been having a media spree for mysterious plans that draw the attention of Bond.  Undercover MI6 agent Miranda Frost (Rosamund Pike) was working for Graves, trying to discover what was going on.

The plot was ridiculous and messy.  The characters were all one-note.  The motivation for most of them were shaky at best.  It was over-the-top in all the bad ways.  It hasn’t been this silly since Moonraker.

There are many plot points that are basically the same as The World is Not Enough.  There are actually just a few differences between the two films.  Bond, once again, sleeps with the bad girl who will betray him later.

And in fact, there is not a whole heck of a lot of things that Bond does well here.  Most of the first half of the film is Bond screwing up or being downright incompetent.

Though Pierce Brosnan was a decent Bond, the films he was in, for me, was 3 out of 4 poor.  I think that has to place him at the bottom of the list of Bonds for me.

stale

Die Another Day (2002) Original One-Sheet Movie Poster - Original ...

The World is Not Enough (1999)

Amazon.com: Wallspace James Bond The World is Not Enough - 11x17 ...

The submarine in the third act of this movie is a perfect metaphor for The World is Not Enough.  It is sinking hard and fast.

The third film of Pierce Brosnan as James Bond was one of the dumbest of the franchise.  I have to reflect on the overall list to decide if it is lower on my list than You Only Live Twice and Monraker and Octopussy, but it is certainly now in the argument.

Sadly, after Tomorrow Never Dies, which I liked a lot, the Bond franchise sunk down into the depths of stupid with The World is Not Enough.

An oil tycoon is murdered and Bond is sent to protect his daughter Elektra (Sophie Marceau) from a terrorist who had kidnapped her when she was younger.  The terrorist Renard (Robert Carlyle) had taken a bullet in the head, but it had not killed him yet.  It left him incapable of feeling pain.  Renard is looking to steal a nuclear bomb for some convoluted reason and Bond is trying to stop him.

This movie hit almost all of the big Bond moments.  There was a ski chase! Bond had to try to diffuse a bomb.  Bond was believed to be dead.  He was in a death trap.  All that was missing was sharks!

Oh and the bad guys here make the Stormtroopers look like expert marksmen.

Seriously though, the melodramatic acting going on here was just laughable.  Denise Richards is not the first name that comes to mind when I think about nuclear physicists.  Robert Carlyle, who brought a lot of life and emotion to the role of Rumpelstiltskin on Once Upon a Time, is just totally ridiculous here.  He was anything but menacing considering he was meant to be a horrible terrorist.  M (Judi Dench) gets to do more.  For example, she is locked in a cell and sits there basically for the third act.  Then, the emotional section of the film (she was connected with Elektra) was just tossed aside for the stupid action beats.  Why use an actress of Dench’s quality if you are not going to let her act?

This is a total waste.  I have one more Pierce Brosnan Bond film to go before we can dive into the Daniel Craig films.  Hopefully, this last one is more watchable.

stale

Amazon.com: Wallspace James Bond The World is Not Enough - 11x17 ...

Tomorrow Never Dies (1997)

Amazon.com: Kirbis Tomorrow Never Dies Movie Poster 18 x 28 Inches ...

The nineteenth James Bond movie and the second with Pierce Brosnan is next on the Bond watch.  It is Tomorrow Never Dies, and after my personal disappointment with GoldenEye, I was wondering what to expect from this movie.

I thought this was an improvement over the previous chapter and that Pierce Brosnan felt more like he had that bit of Bond-ism that was missing from GoldenEye.

Now, I know this may not be a popular opinion, since the world seems to love GoldenEye considerably more than it does Tomorrow Never Dies (Rotten Tomatoes:  GoldenEye 77% and 83% [audience], TND:  57% and 53% [audience]), but I disagree.  I find these numbers extremely fascinating.

In this movie, Bond is back and this time trying to prevent World War III.  When media mogul Elliot Carver (Jonathan Pryce) tries to manipulate a confrontation between China and the United Kingdom in international waters all for the exclusive coverage, James Bond is on the job.  Teaming up with a Chinese agent Wai Lin (Michelle Yeoh), Bond tries to stop the news from being made.

I thought the general media powered plot was very relevant still today as it was 20+ years ago.  Maybe more so.  Jonathan Pryce was exceptional as the film’s villain and his crazed performance was very believable.  I was disappointed in the role given to Teri Hatcher, who played Pryce’s wife and former Bond flame Paris.  Her part of the story was quite limited and she was not vital at all.

I thought this was one of the most exciting cold opens the franchise has had in quite a long while.  The tension was high in the scene and led to a big win for Bond.  We also got a dose of Judi Dench as M here and that is always a welcome sight.

Tomorrow Never Dies does feel a little long and could have been better if they had dropped about 10-15 minutes in the middle of the film.  Still, I believe this is an improvement from the last Brosnan film.  However, word said that the final two Brosnan Bond flicks are pretty bad.  We’ll see.  I liked this one though it was not as popular.  Maybe my thoughts on Bond differ from others.

funtime

Amazon.com: Kirbis Tomorrow Never Dies Movie Poster 18 x 28 Inches ...

GoldenEye (1995)

GoldenEye Font - GoldenEye Font Generator

Although my memory was not being a fan of the Pierce Brosnan version of James Bond, I have been looking forward to this movie as I have had several people tell me it is one of the best Bond films.  I am sure I have seen this once, so I was excited about revisiting it during this Bond re-watch.

I was thoroughly unimpressed.

Pierce Brosnan was fine as our brand new 007.  Reportedly, he was the choice to play Bond prior to Timothy Dalton, but Brosnan could not get out of his contract with the NBC show Remington Steele, so instead we got Dalton (who by the way was a fantastic Bond).  Brosnan does imbue elements of the previous Bonds, but I have to say something felt as if it were missing.  It was an intangible like heart.  Brosnan felt too manufactured, like they were trying to put together the perfect Bond in a factory, but could only come up short.

The story itself was a bit of a stretch and I had a hard time engaging with the threat as the whole GoldenEye is a satellite that can send a devastating EMP to the earth was just too abstract of a threat.

The villains were scattered too much as well.  Famke Janssen was the muscle in this film as Xenia Onatopp, whose wild sexual viciousness played on the old Bond trope of bedding every woman around.  Now, the sexual position was the danger.  Will kind of funny, she was not very interesting, nor very effective.

The real villain of the film was bounced around a bit and that made it feel lesser.  Rogue MI6 agent Alec (Sean Bean) and his motives were unclear.  Was his motive monetary?  Was it revenge?  Was it simply coincidental his involvement?  He did not elicit from me the valued threat to Bond as was intended.

I did enjoy hacker Boris Grishenko (Alan Cumming) with his self-importance and his computer skills.  Alan Cumming stole every scene in which he appeared.

I found myself bored through much of the movie, waiting for something with more sustenance to happen.  The action was mostly generic and even the use of the gadgets were dull.

In one of the standout moments of the film, Judi Dench was introduced as the new M.  This is a tremendous thing and her initial meeting with Bond proved her to be a powerhouse.  She had called Bond a “sexist, misogynist dinosaur” and promised more fireworks between the two.  I would have liked more of this.  We got a new Moneypenny (Samantha Bond) as well.  However, Q is, once again, played by Desmond Llewelyn.

There were a few moments that worked, but the film was flat to me and it was missing some of that Bond magic.  It was quite the letdown after my expectations had been raised.

Underwhelming

GoldenEye Font - GoldenEye Font Generator

Licence to Kill (1989)

Movie Market - Single-sided International Poster of Licence to ...

The seventeenth James Bond film also turned out to be the second and final appearance for Timothy Dalton as Bond.  This is a fact that makes me sad as I have found him to be an exceptional James Bond.

Perhaps you have to look at how the world has changed to understand the changes in the James Bond franchise, but I have found these past two Dalton movies to have fixed many of the issues that the earlier films had suffered from.

We get a strong woman character, Pam Bouvier (Carey Lowell), who helps Bond in a big way.  Yet, we still see the streak of misogyny in the former spy.  However, there is a deeper meaning behind how Bond acts in this film.

Bond heads into revenge mode when his friend Felix Leiter (David Hedison) and his bride (Priscilla Barnes) are attacked on their wedding day, with the bride being killed.  This triggered a deep memory in Bond.  The character had been married once and had his own bride murdered on his wedding day.  This brought all of that back.  It was not just his friendship with Felix that sent Bond after the drug dealers here, but the memory of Blofeld killing Teresa way back in On Her Majesty Secret Service.

So every time I heard Bond trying to get Pam to leave, I saw it as Bond desperately trying to protect someone whom he cares about, not because she was a woman.

This subtle character development was extremely welcome in a series that did not go into too much depth in that area.  That motivation was a positive step.

The action was top notch and our villains were strong.  Robert Davi as drug dealer Sanchez was a huge win as was Benicio del Toro as Dario.

This film continued the trend of more serious, darker films in the James Bond franchise.  I would have been interested to see where the franchise would have gone keeping Timothy Dalton in the role.  However, he would be replaced for the next film, GoldenEye, by Pierce Brosnan.

vintage

Movie Market - Single-sided International Poster of Licence to ...

Dangerous Lies

Dangerous Lies movie review & film summary (2020) | Roger Ebert

One of the new films that appeared on Netflix this weekend is called Dangerous Lies, a mystery/thriller that, despite a few glaring issues and a title that was anything but unique, I enjoyed quite a bit.

Katie (Camila Mendes) and Adam (Jesse T. Usher) are a young married couple with their share of money problems that threatened to overwhelm them.  Katie gets a job working taking care of a well-to-do elderly man, Leonard (Elliot Gould).  After four months, Katie and Leonard had grown close.  Leonard’s sudden death caused uproar in her life, but not as much as when she discovered that Leonard had recently had written a will leaving everything to Katie.

I enjoyed watching this movie, but, I have to say, the more I sit here and reflect back upon it, the more I notice plot threads that are not handled, twists that are truly coincidental and problems with the narrative.

The film, at its core, is a story about how greed and the promise of money can destroy a person and that how even good people can make poor choices when they feel as if they have no other possibility.  As the story unfolds, Katie and Adam make so many dumb decisions that it became frustrating at times.  You can see the bad decisions playing out in front of your face but there was nothing that you could do about it.

The film does a good job of playing its central mystery as if anyone could be involved, but, truthfully, the reveal of exactly what happened had some glaring questions when reflecting back on it.

The performances are solid.  It is good to see Elliot Gould in the film, although his part was minimal.  Both Mendes and Usher are likable and you want to root for them even when you wonder about possible hidden motives.  Sasha Alexander played Detective Chesler, a detective who seemed to feel as if something was off.

Unfortunately, there are too many coincidences that happen and it stretches the credibility of the story.

Still, the film is dumb fun and I did like watching it.  It is one of those movies, I am guessing, that will slip from your mind quickly after watching it.  It is worth a Saturday at home if you’ve got nothing else to do.

3 stars 

The Living Daylights (1987)

James Bond (The Living Daylights One-Sheet) Movie Poster Print ...

A new Bond.  A new direction.  Still diffusing bombs. Still skiing.

The Living Daylights marked the first new James Bond since Roger Moore took over the character in 1973.  Timothy Dalton became the fourth Bond on film (fifth if you count David Niven) following Moore, Sean Connery and George Lazenby.

James Bond fond himself inside a plot where the KGB was trying to assassinate all enemy spies, but he discovered that there is more to the story than that.  When Bond chooses to ignore orders and not kill am apparent Russian sniper Kara (Maryam d’Abo), he joined up with her to search for Russian defector Koskov (Jeroen Krabbé) who was taken back to Russia.  The situation led to the doorstep of arms dealer Brad Whitaker (Joe Don Baker).

This was a refreshing change of pace for the Bond franchise.  There was a more realistic feel, a grittier tone for the super spy while still maintaining the fun gadgets that have been one of 007’s calling cards over the years.  There seemed to be a bit of a backlash to this movie not being as “fun” as some of the other Bond films, and I, for one, was grateful for that.  I thought this was a really great action movie and it was not being weighed down by some of the foolishness that had been so intertwined with the Roger Moore years.

Timothy Dalton jumped into the character immediately and he made a very strong Bond.  We had a less of the playboy Bond than in past movies perhaps because of the world that this film was released within.  He brought a serious tone that has been lacking in Bond for quite a long time.

There is a good performance from John Rhys-Davies in this movie as a Russian General Pushkin.  Maryam d’Abo was solid as the cello-playing Bond girl, Kara.

I liked the way this franchise flipped into more serious nature from the jokey-jokey aspect from previous years.  There was less humor, but, for me, when the one liners came, they were really funny and worked more.

classic

James Bond (The Living Daylights One-Sheet) Movie Poster Print ...

A View to a Kill (1985)

A View to a Kill (1985) - IMDb

I love that song from Duran Duran.  The movie…not so much.

The final Roger Moore appearance as Agent 007 turned out to be one of the worst for the James Bond franchise to this point.

The nature of a lot of these Bond movies have become fairly repetitive.  Bond has to stop a bomb at the last seconds.  The villain is a powerful businessman with a seemingly powerful henchman/woman.  Heck, in A View to a Kill, Bond does more skiing marking the third or fourth time.

Another issue that I was thinking about was…if Bond is so well known as a secret agent, why do they continue to put him undercover without any sort of disguise?  You see in A View to a Kill how simple it was for Zorn (Christopher Walken) to find out Bond’s true identity and everything about him except his shoe size.  I would think that it would hinder the undercover work.

And I hate to continually beat a dead horse (which Bond seems to ride all the time as well), but why do these Bond villains not just shoot Bond in the head and be done with him?  Why do they continually leave him in some kind of death trap in which Bond “easily” escapes from?  You guys do use guns.  It reminded me of the old 1966 Batman series where the Joker or Penguin or whomever would leave Batman and Robin in a ridiculous death trap every episode.  At least there were no guns in Gotham at the time.  Bond bad guys have been letting James off the hook for decades now.

Another issue I had was a specific sound effect.  I actually heard this several times.  It was when a plane is getting ready to crash and it has this dive bomb sound.  Except, here, it was made for a helicopter, and the helicopter was just spinning around in midair.  It was a ridiculous moment and made me laugh out loud.

These are the thoughts I had while much of the first act of this film bored me.

As for A View to a Kill, Bond’s recovery of a microchip from a dead Double O (hence the skiing) leads him to a plot by industrialist sociopath Zorin (Christopher Walken) and his henchperson May Day (Grace Jones) to destroy Silicon Valley and corner the market on microchips.

The entire plot is gobbledygook as they attempt to use the fault lines to destroy the area of California.  The dialogue is pretty poorly written as well.  Walken is good as the psychotic Zorin and you can tell why Grace Jones does not get much to say as the silent assassin.

The action was not great either.  The entire fire truck chase scene was cringe-inducing and the fight on the Golden Gate Bridge made no sense.  Unfortunately, Roger Moore looked his age most of the time as well.

The characterization was also a problem for me, especially the inconsistent way that May Day was presented.  We have SPOILERS seen the henchman change sides in the third act before (aka Jaws in the travesty Moonraker), but at least I understood why.  He was in love.  I understand that May Day was left to die by Walken and that is why she is working with Bond, but why does this woman, who was happy to let millions die in Silicon Valley, become such a self-sacrificing hero at the end?  That did not make any sense and went completely opposite of everything I had been told or shown about May Day up until this point.  END OF SPOILERS

This was Roger Moore’s seventh and final Bond film and we also got the final appearance of Lois Maxwell, who had been playing Miss Moneypenny since the beginning.  This felt like a change for the Bond franchise as the films moving forward take a step away from the Roger Moore silliness of many of the past films.  A View to a Kill was a sad way to end Moore’s run.  He was the Bond that I grew up watching and, looking back, still hold with a soft spot.  Though he had a few big time stinkers, when the films were allowed to balance the camp with the serious, Roger Moore excelled.

And, once again, the title track by Duran Duran is most likely in the top 3-5 Bond songs in the entire franchise.  Truly wish there was a better film to go with such an epic tune.

 

meh

A View to a Kill (1985) - IMDb